The Recent CN¥521m Market Cap Decrease Is Likely to Have Disappointed Insiders Invested in Weima Agricultural Machinery Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:301533)
The Recent CN¥521m Market Cap Decrease Is Likely to Have Disappointed Insiders Invested in Weima Agricultural Machinery Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:301533)
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Weima Agricultural MachineryLtd's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
- 69% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
- Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 業內人士似乎對威馬農業機械有限公司的增長有既得利益,從他們龐大的所有權可以看出
- 69% 的業務由前兩名股東持有
- 所有權研究與過去的表現數據相結合,可以幫助人們更好地了解股票的機會
If you want to know who really controls Weima Agricultural Machinery Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:301533), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 70% to be precise, is individual insiders. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果你想知道誰真正控制了威馬農業機械有限公司, Ltd.(深圳證券交易所代碼:301533),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。持有公司股份最多的集團是內部人士,準確地說是70%左右。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。
And following last week's 17% decline in share price, insiders suffered the most losses.
繼上週股價下跌17%之後,內部人士遭受的損失最大。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Weima Agricultural MachineryLtd, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究威馬農業機械有限公司的每種類型的所有者。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Weima Agricultural MachineryLtd?
關於威馬農業機械有限公司,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。
We can see that Weima Agricultural MachineryLtd does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Weima Agricultural MachineryLtd's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到,威馬農業機械有限公司確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到威馬農業機械有限公司的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。
Weima Agricultural MachineryLtd is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Feng Xia with 35% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 34% and 3.2% of the stock. Hua Yan, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.
威馬農業機械有限公司不歸對沖基金所有。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是馮夏,已發行股份的35%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約34%和3.2%的股份。第二大股東華燕也恰好擁有首席執行官的頭銜。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 2 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.
在進一步挖掘之後,我們發現前兩位股東共同控制了公司一半以上的股份,這意味着他們擁有影響公司決策的巨大權力。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。我們目前沒有收到分析師對該股的任何報道,因此該公司不太可能被廣泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of Weima Agricultural MachineryLtd
威馬農業機械有限公司的內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Weima Agricultural Machinery Co.,Ltd.. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. That means they own CN¥1.8b worth of shares in the CN¥2.5b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的最新數據表明,內部人士擁有威馬農業機械有限公司的大部分股份。,有限公司。這意味着他們可以共同爲公司做出決定。這意味着他們擁有這家25億元人民幣公司價值18億元人民幣的股份。這很有意義。大多數人會認爲這是積極的,顯示出與股東的強烈一致性。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 19% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司19%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 5.2%, of the Weima Agricultural MachineryLtd stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
私人公司似乎擁有威馬農業機械有限公司5.2%的股份。私營公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過控股私營公司而對上市公司擁有權益,而不是以個人身份擁有權益。儘管很難得出任何寬泛的結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個需要進一步研究的領域。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Weima Agricultural MachineryLtd you should be aware of.
儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。一個很好的例子:我們發現了你應該注意的威馬農業機械有限公司的1個警告標誌。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.
當然,這可能不是最值得買入的股票。因此,來看看這份免費的有趣公司名單吧。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。