share_log

The Recent CN¥894m Market Cap Decrease Is Likely to Have Disappointed Insiders Invested in Haisco Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002653)

The Recent CN¥894m Market Cap Decrease Is Likely to Have Disappointed Insiders Invested in Haisco Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002653)

最近8.94億元人民幣的市值下降可能會讓投資海思科製藥集團有限公司(SZSE:002653)的內部人士感到失望
Simply Wall St ·  04/22 00:05

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant insider control over Haisco Pharmaceutical Group implies vested interests in company growth
  • 60% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
  • Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 對海思科製藥集團的重大內部控制意味着公司增長的既得利益
  • 60% 的業務由前兩名股東持有
  • 所有權研究與過去的表現數據相結合,可以幫助人們更好地了解股票的機會

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Haisco Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002653), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 79% to be precise, is individual insiders. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解誰真正控制了海思科製藥集團有限公司(SZSE:002653),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。持有公司股份最多的集團是內部人士,準確地說約爲79%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

And following last week's 3.0% decline in share price, insiders suffered the most losses.

繼上週股價下跌3.0%之後,內部人士遭受的損失最大。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Haisco Pharmaceutical Group.

在下圖中,我們放大了海思科製藥集團的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
SZSE:002653 Ownership Breakdown April 22nd 2024
SZSE: 002653 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 22 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Haisco Pharmaceutical Group?

關於海思科製藥集團,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

Haisco Pharmaceutical Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Haisco Pharmaceutical Group, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

海思科製藥集團已經在股份登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看海思科製藥集團過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:002653 Earnings and Revenue Growth April 22nd 2024
SZSE: 002653 2024年4月22日收益和收入增長

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Haisco Pharmaceutical Group. Our data shows that Jun Min Wang is the largest shareholder with 36% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 24% and 14% of the stock. Xiu Lian Fan, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對海思科製藥集團進行有意義的投資。我們的數據顯示,王軍敏是最大股東,已發行股份的36%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約24%和14%的股份。第二大股東範秀蓮也恰好擁有首席執行官的頭銜。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 60% stake.

對股東登記處的更詳細的研究表明,有兩位大股東通過其60%的股份擁有該公司相當大的所有權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。分析師對該股的報道很少,但報道不多。因此,它還有獲得更多報道的餘地。

Insider Ownership Of Haisco Pharmaceutical Group

海思科製藥集團的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Haisco Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd.. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. Given it has a market cap of CN¥29b, that means insiders have a whopping CN¥23b worth of shares in their own names. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been selling any of their shares.

我們的最新數據表明,內部人士擁有海思科製藥集團有限公司的大部分股份。這意味着他們可以共同爲公司做出決定。鑑於其市值爲290億元人民幣,這意味着內部人士以自己的名義擁有高達230億元人民幣的股票。很高興看到這樣的投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士是否在出售他們的任何股票。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 13% stake in Haisco Pharmaceutical Group. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有海思科製藥集團13%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Haisco Pharmaceutical Group you should be aware of.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。一個很好的例子:我們發現了海思科製藥集團的兩個警告信號,你應該注意。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論