Individual Investors Who Hold 47% of Chengdu RML Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301050) Gained 9.8%, Insiders Profited as Well
Individual Investors Who Hold 47% of Chengdu RML Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301050) Gained 9.8%, Insiders Profited as Well
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over Chengdu RML Technology by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The top 15 shareholders own 50% of the company
- 28% of Chengdu RML Technology is held by insiders
- 個人投資者對成都RML科技的重要控制意味着普通公衆有更大的權力來影響管理和治理相關的決策。
- 前15大股東擁有該公司50%的股份。
- 成都RML科技28%的股份由內部人持有。
If you want to know who really controls Chengdu RML Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301050), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 47% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果你想知道誰真正控制着成都RML科技股份有限公司(SZSE:301050),那麼你得看一下它的股權登記簿的構成。擁有最大份額的是47%股權由個人投資者持有的那一組。換句話說,該組最有可能從他們對公司的投資中獲得最大的收益(或損失)。
Following a 9.8% increase in the stock price last week, individual investors profited the most, but insiders who own 28% stock also stood to gain from the increase.
在股價上漲9.8%上週之後,個人投資者獲利最多,但持有28%的內部人也從上漲中獲益。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Chengdu RML Technology, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解成都RML科技各類型的所有者,先從下面的圖表開始。
![ownership-breakdown](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240423/0-8ccdb954f4a0617eb19e8bd900c0e72e-0-8a3920b6fda9579ff51eb61aa990414a.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Chengdu RML Technology?
機構投資者對成都RML科技有持股,他們持有公司的很大一部分股票。這意味着這些機構的分析師已經看過這隻股票並且他們喜歡它。但像其他人一樣,他們可能是錯誤的。如果多個機構同時改變對於一隻股票的看法,股價可能會快速下跌。因此,看看成都RML科技以下的收益歷史是值得的。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
We can see that Chengdu RML Technology does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Chengdu RML Technology's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到成都RML科技確實有機構投資者,並且他們持有該公司很大一部分的股票。這意味着這些機構的分析師已經看過這隻股票並且他們喜歡它。但像其他人一樣,他們可能是錯誤的。如果多個機構同時改變對於一隻股票的看法,股價可能會快速下跌。這意味着這些機構的分析師已經看過這隻股票並且他們喜歡它。但像其他人一樣,他們可能是錯誤的。如果多個機構同時改變對於一隻股票的看法,股價可能會快速下跌。因此,看看成都RML科技以下的收益歷史是值得的。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
![earnings-and-revenue-growth](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240423/0-8ccdb954f4a0617eb19e8bd900c0e72e-1-b78b0c750ad22559f0a0c2b82c90b810.png/big)
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Chengdu RML Technology. The company's CEO Jieru Deng is the largest shareholder with 19% of shares outstanding. With 8.9% and 4.7% of the shares outstanding respectively, Chencheng Han and Chongqing Yida Enterprise Management Partnership Enterprise (Limited Partnership) are the second and third largest shareholders.
我們注意到對成都RML科技沒有有意義的對沖基金投資。該公司的首席執行官鄧潔如擁有19%的流通股份,是最大的股東。其次是陳誠含和重慶移達企業管理合夥企業有限合夥,他們分別持有8.9%和4.7%的流通股份。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 15 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
經過更深入的挖掘,我們發現前15名股東在公司中擁有50%的組合持股,這表明沒有單一的股東對公司擁有重大控制權。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
雖然研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議以加深對股票預期表現的全面了解也是一個好習慣。雖然有部分分析師的覆蓋,但該公司可能沒有受到廣泛的關注。因此,在未來可能會受到更多關注。
Insider Ownership Of Chengdu RML Technology
成都RML科技內部人包括高管持有公司的顯著股份。內部人持有價值2.4億元人民幣,佔市值爲85億元的公司的股份。這相當重要,大多數人認爲這表明了與股東的良好契合度,特別是在這樣一個規模的公司。你可以點擊這裏查看內部人是否一直在購買或出售股票。
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Chengdu RML Technology Co., Ltd.. Insiders own CN¥2.4b worth of shares in the CN¥8.5b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
普通公衆,包括零售投資者,擁有該公司的47%股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這種所有權的大小可能不足以傾向他們有利政策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 47% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
我們的數據顯示私人公司持有該公司11%的股份。這可能值得深入研究。如果相關方,如內部人,擁有其中一個私人公司的利益,那麼這應該在年度報告中披露。私人公司可能也對該公司有戰略興趣。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 11%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我們的數據顯示,私人公司持有該公司11%的股份。這可能值得深入研究。如果相關方,如內部人,擁有其中一個私人公司的利益,那麼這應該在年度報告中披露。私人公司可能也對該公司有戰略興趣。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.
雖然考慮所有擁有一家公司的群體很重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.
我喜歡深入了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以免費訪問該互動圖表,了解其過去的盈利、營業收入和現金流。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。