Lionco Pharmaceutical Group Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:603669) Biggest Owners Are Private Companies Who Got Richer After Stock Soared 18% Last Week
Lionco Pharmaceutical Group Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:603669) Biggest Owners Are Private Companies Who Got Richer After Stock Soared 18% Last Week
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Lionco Pharmaceutical GroupLtd's significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- The top 2 shareholders own 54% of the company
- 16% of Lionco Pharmaceutical GroupLtd is held by insiders
- Lionco Pharmaceutical GroupLtd擁有大量私營公司所有權,這表明關鍵決策受廣大公衆股東的影響
- 前2名股東擁有公司54%的股份
- 聯科製藥集團有限公司16%的股份由內部人士持有
Every investor in Lionco Pharmaceutical Group Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:603669) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 47% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
Lionco 製藥集團公司的每位投資者, Ltd.(上海證券交易所代碼:603669)應該知道最強大的股東群體。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有47%所有權的私營公司。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
As a result, private companies were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 18% gain.
結果,私營公司是上週18%漲幅的最大受益者。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Lionco Pharmaceutical GroupLtd.
在下圖中,我們放大了Lionco Pharmaceutical GroupLtd的不同所有權組。
What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lionco Pharmaceutical GroupLtd?
關於Lionco Pharmaceutical GroupLtd,缺乏機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
We don't tend to see institutional investors holding stock of companies that are very risky, thinly traded, or very small. Though we do sometimes see large companies without institutions on the register, it's not particularly common.
我們往往不會看到機構投資者持有風險很大、交易量稀少或規模很小的公司的股票。儘管我們有時會看到大公司沒有註冊機構,但這種情況並不特別常見。
There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. On the other hand, it's always possible that professional investors are avoiding a company because they don't think it's the best place for their money. Lionco Pharmaceutical GroupLtd might not have the sort of past performance institutions are looking for, or perhaps they simply have not studied the business closely.
沒有機構擁有公司股份的原因可能多種多樣。通常,小型的新上市公司不會引起基金經理的太多關注,因爲大型基金經理不可能在公司中建立有意義的地位。另一方面,專業投資者總是有可能避開一家公司,因爲他們認爲這不是賺錢的最佳去處。Lionco Pharmaceutical GroupLtd可能沒有機構想要的那種過去的業績,或者他們可能根本沒有仔細研究該業務。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Lionco Pharmaceutical GroupLtd. Zhejiang Lionco Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 47% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.7% and 3.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Ling Ping Tao, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.
對沖基金在萊昂科製藥集團有限公司的股份不多。浙江聯科藥業股份有限公司目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份的47%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的6.7%和3.0%。第二大股東凌平濤也恰好擁有首席執行官的頭銜。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前兩名股東擁有公司的多數股權,這意味着他們足夠強大,足以影響公司的決策。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。我們目前沒有收到分析師對該股的任何報道,因此該公司不太可能被廣泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of Lionco Pharmaceutical GroupLtd
Lionco 製藥集團有限公司的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Lionco Pharmaceutical Group Co.,Ltd.. Insiders own CN¥468m worth of shares in the CN¥3.0b company. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.
我們的信息表明,內部人士持有Lionco製藥集團公司的大量股份。,有限公司。內部人士擁有這家30億元人民幣公司價值4.68億元人民幣的股份。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有大量股份。你可以點擊這裏查看他們是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 37% stake in Lionco Pharmaceutical GroupLtd. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆通常是個人投資者,持有Lionco Pharmaceutical GroupLtd37%的股份。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 47%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我們可以看到,私人公司擁有已發行股份的47%。私營公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過控股私營公司而對上市公司擁有權益,而不是以個人身份擁有權益。儘管很難得出任何寬泛的結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個需要進一步研究的領域。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Lionco Pharmaceutical GroupLtd that you should be aware of before investing here.
我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們發現了Lionco Pharmaceutical GroupLtd的1個警告信號,在投資這裏之前,你應該注意這個信號。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.
當然,這可能不是最值得買入的股票。因此,您可能希望看到我們免費收集的具有良好財務狀況的有趣潛在客戶。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。