share_log

Some Investors May Be Willing To Look Past Perennial International's (HKG:725) Soft Earnings

Some Investors May Be Willing To Look Past Perennial International's (HKG:725) Soft Earnings

一些投資者可能願意忽略恒利國際(HKG: 725)的軟收益
Simply Wall St ·  04/26 07:26

The market for Perennial International Limited's (HKG:725) shares didn't move much after it posted weak earnings recently. We did some digging, and we believe the earnings are stronger than they seem.

近期,Perennial International Limited(HKG:725)的股票市場表現平平,但我們深入調查後發現它的盈利要好於表面看起來的弱勢。

earnings-and-revenue-history
SEHK:725 Earnings and Revenue History April 25th 2024
SEHK:725的收益和營收歷史(截至2024年4月25日)

Examining Cashflow Against Perennial International's Earnings

對比Perennial International盈利和現金流

As finance nerds would already know, the accrual ratio from cashflow is a key measure for assessing how well a company's free cash flow (FCF) matches its profit. To get the accrual ratio we first subtract FCF from profit for a period, and then divide that number by the average operating assets for the period. You could think of the accrual ratio from cashflow as the 'non-FCF profit ratio'.

作爲財務迷已經了解的,現金流的應計比率是評估公司自由現金流(FCF)與利潤匹配情況的關鍵指標。爲了得到應計比率,我們首先要從一個時期的利潤中減去FCF,然後將這個數字除以該時期的平均營運資產。你可以將現金流的應計比率視爲“非FCF的獲利比例”。

That means a negative accrual ratio is a good thing, because it shows that the company is bringing in more free cash flow than its profit would suggest. While having an accrual ratio above zero is of little concern, we do think it's worth noting when a company has a relatively high accrual ratio. Notably, there is some academic evidence that suggests that a high accrual ratio is a bad sign for near-term profits, generally speaking.

這意味着負的應計比率是一件好事,因爲它表明公司比其利潤所示帶來了更多的自由現金流。雖然應計比率高於零不足爲憑,但如果公司的應計比率相對較高,我們認爲這值得注意。值得注意的是,有一些學術證據表明,相對而言,高應計比率是短期利潤的不利信號。

Over the twelve months to December 2023, Perennial International recorded an accrual ratio of -0.10. Therefore, its statutory earnings were quite a lot less than its free cashflow. To wit, it produced free cash flow of HK$54m during the period, dwarfing its reported profit of HK$15.7m. Perennial International did see its free cash flow drop year on year, which is less than ideal, like a Simpson's episode without Groundskeeper Willie. However, that's not all there is to consider. The accrual ratio is reflecting the impact of unusual items on statutory profit, at least in part.

在2023年12月的十二個月裏,Perennial International記錄的應計比率爲-0.10。因此,其法定收益比自由現金流要少很多。它在此期間產生了5400萬港元的自由現金流,而其聲稱的利潤爲1570萬港元。雖然Perennial International的自由現金流同比下降,這並不是理想的情況,就像沒有Groundskeeper Willie的辛普森一樣。但是,我們不僅要考慮這些。應計比率在很大程度上反映了不尋常項目對法定盈利的影響。

Note: we always recommend investors check balance sheet strength. Click here to be taken to our balance sheet analysis of Perennial International.

注意:我們始終建議投資者檢查資產負債表的強度。單擊此處,則可跳轉到我們對Perennial International資產負債表分析的文章。

The Impact Of Unusual Items On Profit

除了稀釋之外,還應該注意的是,萬集科技在過去12個月中因不尋常項目獲得了價值人民幣3.5萬元的利潤。雖然我們希望看到利潤增加,但當這些不尋常項目對利潤做出重大貢獻時,我們會更加謹慎。我們對全球大部分上市公司的數據進行了分析,發現不尋常項目往往是一次性的。這正如我們所期望的那樣,因爲這些提升被描述爲"不尋常"。相對於其利潤而言,萬集科技在2021年12月前的不尋常項目貢獻大。因此,我們可以推斷出,這些不尋常項目正在使其財務利潤顯著增強。

Perennial International's profit was reduced by unusual items worth HK$11m in the last twelve months, and this helped it produce high cash conversion, as reflected by its unusual items. In a scenario where those unusual items included non-cash charges, we'd expect to see a strong accrual ratio, which is exactly what has happened in this case. It's never great to see unusual items costing the company profits, but on the upside, things might improve sooner rather than later. We looked at thousands of listed companies and found that unusual items are very often one-off in nature. And that's hardly a surprise given these line items are considered unusual. In the twelve months to December 2023, Perennial International had a big unusual items expense. As a result, we can surmise that the unusual items made its statutory profit significantly weaker than it would otherwise be.

在過去的十二個月內,Perennial International的利潤因價值1100萬港元的不尋常項目而減少,因此,它的現金轉化率較高,這反映在其不尋常項目中。在這種不尋常項目包括非現金費用的情況下,我們預計會看到強勁的應計比率,而這正是本例的情況。雖然非尋常項目影響公司的盈利不利,但好在它們往往是一次性的支出,並非常見。在過去的十二個月中,Perennial International有一個很大的不尋常項目支出。因此,我們可以推斷出,這些不尋常項目使其法定利潤顯著弱於它本應有的收益。

Our Take On Perennial International's Profit Performance

對Perennial International的盈利表現分析

In conclusion, both Perennial International's accrual ratio and its unusual items suggest that its statutory earnings are probably reasonably conservative. Based on these factors, we think Perennial International's earnings potential is at least as good as it seems, and maybe even better! In light of this, if you'd like to do more analysis on the company, it's vital to be informed of the risks involved. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs that you should run your eye over to get a better picture of Perennial International.

綜上所述,Perennial International的應計比率和不尋常項目表明其法定盈利可能相當保守。基於這些因素,我們認爲Perennial International的盈利潛力至少與它看起來的一樣好,甚至更好!考慮到這一點,如果您想對公司進行更多的分析,則了解其中涉及的風險是至關重要的。例如,我們發現了2個警告信號,您應該仔細閱讀它以獲得對Perennial International更好的了解。

Our examination of Perennial International has focussed on certain factors that can make its earnings look better than they are. And it has passed with flying colours. But there is always more to discover if you are capable of focussing your mind on minutiae. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks that insiders are buying to be useful.

我們對Perennial International的分析關注了可以使其盈利看起來更好的某些因素。而且,經過充分的證明,我們得出這個結論。但是,如果你能專注於細節方面,總能發現更多。例如,許多人認爲高股東權益回報率表明良好的商業經濟,而另一些人則喜歡“跟着錢來”的方式並尋找內部人員正在購買的股票。雖然這可能需要您進行一些研究,但您可能會發現這個普及性的企業組合擁有高回報率,而這個股票組合則是你有用的。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論