share_log

Private Companies Among Betta Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300558) Largest Shareholders, Saw Gain in Holdings Value After Stock Jumped 5.1% Last Week

Private Companies Among Betta Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300558) Largest Shareholders, Saw Gain in Holdings Value After Stock Jumped 5.1% Last Week

貝塔製藥有限公司中的私營公司。”s (SZSE: 300558) 上週股價上漲5.1%後,最大股東的持股價值有所上漲
Simply Wall St ·  05/06 23:53

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant control over Betta Pharmaceuticals by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 9 shareholders
  • Institutions own 16% of Betta Pharmaceuticals
  • 私營公司對Betta Pharmicals的嚴格控制意味着公衆擁有更大的影響管理和治理相關決策的權力
  • 50% 的業務由前9名股東持有
  • 機構擁有貝塔製藥16%的股份

Every investor in Betta Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300558) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 41% to be precise, is private companies. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

貝達製藥有限公司(深圳證券交易所代碼:300558)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。持有該公司股份最多的集團是私營公司,準確地說約爲41%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果股價下跌,則損失最大)。

As a result, private companies were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 5.1% gain.

結果,私營公司是上週5.1%漲幅的最大受益者。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Betta Pharmaceuticals.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關貝塔製藥的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
SZSE:300558 Ownership Breakdown May 7th 2024
SZSE: 300558 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 7 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Betta Pharmaceuticals?

關於貝塔製藥,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

We can see that Betta Pharmaceuticals does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Betta Pharmaceuticals' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到,貝塔製藥確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Betta Pharmaceuticals的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:300558 Earnings and Revenue Growth May 7th 2024
SZSE: 300558 收益和收入增長 2024 年 5 月 7 日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Betta Pharmaceuticals. Ningbo Kaiming Investment Management Partnership Enterprise (Limited Partnership) is currently the company's largest shareholder with 19% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 13% and 6.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

對沖基金在貝達製藥的股票不多。寧波開明投資管理合夥企業(有限合夥)目前是公司的最大股東,已發行股份的19%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的13%和6.9%。

We also observed that the top 9 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前9名股東佔股票登記冊的一半以上,少數規模較小的股東可以在一定程度上平衡大股東的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Betta Pharmaceuticals

貝塔製藥的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Betta Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth CN¥691m. Most would see this as a real positive. Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們可以報告說,內部人士確實擁有貝達製藥有限公司的股份。內部人士持有價值6.91億元人民幣的大量股份。大多數人會認爲這是一個真正的積極因素。大多數人會說,這表明股東和董事會之間的利益一致。儘管如此,可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 39% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Betta Pharmaceuticals. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Betta Pharmicals擁有39%的所有權,主要由個人投資者組成的公衆對貝塔製藥有一定程度的影響力。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 41%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們的數據顯示,私營公司持有公司41%的股份。私營公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過控股私營公司而對上市公司擁有權益,而不是以個人身份擁有權益。儘管很難得出任何寬泛的結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個需要進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Betta Pharmaceuticals , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,以永遠存在的投資風險幽靈爲例。我們已經向Betta Pharmicals發現了一個警告信號,了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論