share_log

Stepan Company's (NYSE:SCL) Has Performed Well But Fundamentals Look Varied: Is There A Clear Direction For The Stock?

Stepan Company's (NYSE:SCL) Has Performed Well But Fundamentals Look Varied: Is There A Clear Direction For The Stock?

Stepan Company(紐約證券交易所代碼:SCL)表現良好,但基本面看起來各不相同:股票有明確的方向嗎?
Simply Wall St ·  05/08 08:27

Stepan's (NYSE:SCL) stock is up by 4.7% over the past week. However, we decided to study the company's mixed-bag of fundamentals to assess what this could mean for future share prices, as stock prices tend to be aligned with a company's long-term financial performance. Specifically, we decided to study Stepan's ROE in this article.

過去一週,Stepan (NYSE:SCL) 的股票上漲了4.7%。然而,我們決定研究公司基本面的綜合情況,以評估這可能對未來股價意味着什麼,因爲股價往往與公司的長期財務業績一致。具體來說,我們在本文中決定研究Stepan的roe。

Return on equity or ROE is an important factor to be considered by a shareholder because it tells them how effectively their capital is being reinvested. In other words, it is a profitability ratio which measures the rate of return on the capital provided by the company's shareholders.

對於股東來說,股東回報率(ROE)是一個重要的考慮因素,因爲它告訴股東他們的資本被有效地再投資了多少。換句話說,它是一個衡量公司股東提供的資本回報率的盈利能力比率。

How Is ROE Calculated?

淨資產收益率怎麼計算?

The formula for return on equity is:

權益回報率的計算公式是:

Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity

淨資產收益率 = 淨利潤(從持續經營中獲得)÷ 股東權益

So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Stepan is:

因此,根據上述公式,Stepan的ROE爲:

3.1% = US$38m ÷ US$1.2b (Based on the trailing twelve months to March 2024).

3.1% = US$38m ÷ US$1.2b(基於過去十二個月至2024年3月)。

The 'return' is the profit over the last twelve months. One way to conceptualize this is that for each $1 of shareholders' capital it has, the company made $0.03 in profit.

'回報'是過去十二個月的利潤。一個概念化這一點的方法是,對於每$1的股東資本,公司獲得了$0.03的利潤。

What Has ROE Got To Do With Earnings Growth?

ROE與盈利增長有什麼關係?

We have already established that ROE serves as an efficient profit-generating gauge for a company's future earnings. We now need to evaluate how much profit the company reinvests or "retains" for future growth which then gives us an idea about the growth potential of the company. Assuming everything else remains unchanged, the higher the ROE and profit retention, the higher the growth rate of a company compared to companies that don't necessarily bear these characteristics.

我們已經確定了roe作爲衡量公司未來收益的有效收益率。現在我們需要評估公司再投資或“保留”的利潤,以便了解公司的增長潛力。假設其他一切不變,ROE和利潤保留率越高,公司的增長率就越高,而與不一定具備這些特徵的公司相比。

Stepan's Earnings Growth And 3.1% ROE

Stepan的收益增長和3.1%的ROE

It is hard to argue that Stepan's ROE is much good in and of itself. Not just that, even compared to the industry average of 12%, the company's ROE is entirely unremarkable. Therefore, it might not be wrong to say that the five year net income decline of 6.1% seen by Stepan was possibly a result of it having a lower ROE. We believe that there also might be other aspects that are negatively influencing the company's earnings prospects. For instance, the company has a very high payout ratio, or is faced with competitive pressures.

很難說Stepan的ROE本身很好。不僅如此,即使與行業平均值12%相比,公司的ROE也毫不引人注目。因此,可以說Stepan所見的五年淨收入下降6.1%可能是其ROE較低所致。我們認爲,可能還有其他方面對公司的盈利前景產生了負面影響。例如,公司的股息支付率非常高,或者遭受了競爭壓力。

That being said, we compared Stepan's performance with the industry and were concerned when we found that while the company has shrunk its earnings, the industry has grown its earnings at a rate of 14% in the same 5-year period.

話雖如此,我們將Stepan的表現與行業進行了比較,發現在同一5年期間,而行業的收益增長率爲14%,而該公司卻縮減了其收益。

past-earnings-growth
NYSE:SCL Past Earnings Growth May 8th 2024
NYSE:SCL過去的收益增長率5月8日2024

Earnings growth is a huge factor in stock valuation. It's important for an investor to know whether the market has priced in the company's expected earnings growth (or decline). By doing so, they will have an idea if the stock is headed into clear blue waters or if swampy waters await. Is SCL fairly valued? This infographic on the company's intrinsic value has everything you need to know.

收益增長是股票估值的一個重要因素。投資者必須知道市場是否已經定價了公司預期的收益增長(或下降)。通過這樣做,他們將了解股票是否進入了清晰的藍水區,或者是否會遇到沼澤水域。SCL是否公平定價?該公司內在價值的信息圖表中包含了您需要了解的一切。

Is Stepan Making Efficient Use Of Its Profits?

Stepan是否充分利用其利潤?

Stepan's low three-year median payout ratio of 21% (implying that it retains the remaining 79% of its profits) comes as a surprise when you pair it with the shrinking earnings. The low payout should mean that the company is retaining most of its earnings and consequently, should see some growth. It looks like there might be some other reasons to explain the lack in that respect. For example, the business could be in decline.

當您將Stepan的三年中位數股息支付率(暗示其保留其利潤的剩餘79%)與收縮的收益相匹配時,其低股息支付率會讓人驚訝。低股息支付率意味着公司保留了大部分收益,因此應該看到一些增長。看起來可能有其他原因來解釋這種現象。例如,業務可能正在下降。

In addition, Stepan has been paying dividends over a period of at least ten years suggesting that keeping up dividend payments is way more important to the management even if it comes at the cost of business growth.

此外,Stepan一直在支付股息,時間至少延續了十年,這表明即使以犧牲業務增長爲代價,保持股息支付也更加重要。

Summary

總的來說,我們對偉明環保的表現非常滿意。具體而言,我們喜歡公司以高回報率再投資了其利潤的很大一部分。當然,這導致公司的收益大幅增長。但是,最新的行業分析師預測表明,該公司的收益預計將加速增長。

Overall, we have mixed feelings about Stepan. Even though it appears to be retaining most of its profits, given the low ROE, investors may not be benefitting from all that reinvestment after all. The low earnings growth suggests our theory correct. With that said, we studied the latest analyst forecasts and found that while the company has shrunk its earnings in the past, analysts expect its earnings to grow in the future. To know more about the latest analysts predictions for the company, check out this visualization of analyst forecasts for the company.

總體而言,我們對Stepan持有矛盾的看法。儘管它似乎保留了大部分利潤,但鑑於低ROE,投資者可能並沒有從所有再投資中受益。收益增長率低說明我們的理論是正確的。話雖如此,我們研究了最新的分析師預測,並發現雖然公司在過去曾縮減其收益,但分析師預計其未來的收益將會增長。了解更多有關該公司的最新分析師預測,請查看分析師對該公司的預測的這個可視化形式。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論