Private Companies in Shanghai Chemspec Corporation (SHSE:688602) Are Its Biggest Bettors, and Their Bets Paid off as Stock Gained 9.7% Last Week
Private Companies in Shanghai Chemspec Corporation (SHSE:688602) Are Its Biggest Bettors, and Their Bets Paid off as Stock Gained 9.7% Last Week
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Shanghai Chemspec's significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- The top 3 shareholders own 55% of the company
- Institutions own 14% of Shanghai Chemspec
- Shanghai Chemspec擁有大量的私營公司所有權,這表明關鍵決策受廣大公衆股東的影響
- 前三名股東擁有公司55%的股份
- 機構擁有上海化工集團14%的股份
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Shanghai Chemspec Corporation (SHSE:688602), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 48% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解誰真正控制了上海凱斯佩克公司(SHSE: 688602),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。我們可以看到,私營公司擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲48%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
As a result, private companies collectively scored the highest last week as the company hit CN¥4.5b market cap following a 9.7% gain in the stock.
結果,上週私營公司總得分最高,該公司的市值在股價上漲9.7%後達到45億元人民幣。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Shanghai Chemspec.
在下圖中,我們放大了上海Chemspec的不同所有權組。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shanghai Chemspec?
關於上海 Chemspec,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Shanghai Chemspec. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Shanghai Chemspec's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
如你所見,機構投資者在上海Chemspec擁有相當數量的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到上海Chemspec的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Shanghai Chemspec. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Ningbo Meishan Bonded Port Area Ouchang Investment Management Co., Ltd. with 35% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 11% and 8.8% of the stock.
我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對上海Chemspec進行有意義的投資。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大股東是寧波梅山保稅港區歐昌投資管理有限公司,其已發行股份的35%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約11%和8.8%的股份。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 55% stake.
對股東登記冊的更詳細研究表明,前三名股東通過其55%的股份擁有公司的大量所有權。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.
研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。據我們所知,沒有分析師對該公司進行報道,因此它可能處於雷達之下。
Insider Ownership Of Shanghai Chemspec
上海 Chemspec 的內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. Not all jurisdictions have the same rules around disclosing insider ownership, and it is possible we have missed something, here. So you can click here learn more about the CEO.
我們的數據無法證實董事會成員親自持有股份。並非所有司法管轄區在披露內部所有權方面都有相同的規則,我們有可能在這裏遺漏了一些東西。因此,您可以單擊此處了解有關首席執行官的更多信息。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
With a 28% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Shanghai Chemspec. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
擁有28%的所有權的普通大衆(主要是個人投資者)對上海化學展有一定程度的影響力。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Equity Ownership
私募股權所有權
Private equity firms hold a 8.8% stake in Shanghai Chemspec. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.
私募股權公司持有上海化工8.8%的股份。這表明他們可以在關鍵政策決策中發揮影響力。有些人可能會喜歡這樣,因爲私募股權有時是追究管理層責任的激進分子。但是其他時候,私募股權在公司上市後正在售罄。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 48%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我們的數據表明,私人公司持有該公司48%的股份。可能值得對此進行更深入的研究。如果關聯方,例如內部人士,對其中一傢俬營公司感興趣,則應在年度報告中披露。私營公司也可能對公司有戰略利益。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Shanghai Chemspec better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Shanghai Chemspec you should know about.
擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解上海Chemspec,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,考慮風險。每家公司都有它們,我們發現了兩個你應該知道的上海Chemspec警告標誌。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.
當然,這可能不是最值得買入的股票。因此,來看看這份免費的有趣公司名單吧。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。