share_log

Here's Why Moog (NYSE:MOG.A) Has Caught The Eye Of Investors

Here's Why Moog (NYSE:MOG.A) Has Caught The Eye Of Investors

這就是穆格(紐約證券交易所代碼:MOG.A)引起投資者注意的原因
Simply Wall St ·  05/21 08:59

The excitement of investing in a company that can reverse its fortunes is a big draw for some speculators, so even companies that have no revenue, no profit, and a record of falling short, can manage to find investors. But as Peter Lynch said in One Up On Wall Street, 'Long shots almost never pay off.' A loss-making company is yet to prove itself with profit, and eventually the inflow of external capital may dry up.

對一些投機者來說,投資一家能夠扭轉命運的公司的興奮感是一個很大的吸引力,因此,即使是沒有收入、沒有利潤、有虧損記錄的公司,也可以設法找到投資者。但是正如彼得·林奇所說 One Up On Wall 街,“遠射幾乎永遠不會得到回報。”虧損的公司尚未用利潤證明自己,最終外部資本的流入可能會枯竭。

So if this idea of high risk and high reward doesn't suit, you might be more interested in profitable, growing companies, like Moog (NYSE:MOG.A). While profit isn't the sole metric that should be considered when investing, it's worth recognising businesses that can consistently produce it.

因此,如果這種高風險和高回報的想法不適合,你可能會對像穆格(紐約證券交易所代碼:MOG.A)這樣盈利的成長型公司更感興趣。儘管利潤不是投資時應考慮的唯一指標,但值得表彰能夠持續生產利潤的企業。

How Quickly Is Moog Increasing Earnings Per Share?

穆格增加每股收益的速度有多快?

The market is a voting machine in the short term, but a weighing machine in the long term, so you'd expect share price to follow earnings per share (EPS) outcomes eventually. That makes EPS growth an attractive quality for any company. Shareholders will be happy to know that Moog's EPS has grown 29% each year, compound, over three years. As a general rule, we'd say that if a company can keep up that sort of growth, shareholders will be beaming.

市場在短期內是投票機,但從長遠來看是一臺權衡器,因此您預計股價最終將跟隨每股收益(EPS)的結果。這使得每股收益的增長對任何公司來說都是一種有吸引力的品質。股東們會很高興得知穆格的每股收益在三年內複合每年增長29%。一般來說,如果一家公司能跟上步伐,我們會這麼說 那個 有點像增長,股東們會喜氣洋洋。

One way to double-check a company's growth is to look at how its revenue, and earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) margins are changing. While we note Moog achieved similar EBIT margins to last year, revenue grew by a solid 12% to US$3.5b. That's progress.

仔細檢查公司增長的一種方法是查看其收入以及利息和稅前收益(EBIT)利潤率如何變化。儘管我們注意到穆格實現了與去年相似的息稅前利潤率,但收入穩步增長了12%,達到35億美元。這就是進步。

In the chart below, you can see how the company has grown earnings and revenue, over time. To see the actual numbers, click on the chart.

在下圖中,您可以看到公司如何隨着時間的推移實現收益和收入的增長。要查看實際數字,請單擊圖表。

earnings-and-revenue-history
NYSE:MOG.A Earnings and Revenue History May 21st 2024
紐約證券交易所:MOG.A 收益和收入歷史記錄 2024 年 5 月 21 日

Of course the knack is to find stocks that have their best days in the future, not in the past. You could base your opinion on past performance, of course, but you may also want to check this interactive graph of professional analyst EPS forecasts for Moog.

當然,訣竅是找到未來表現最好的股票,而不是過去的股票。當然,你可以根據過去的表現來看待你的看法,但你可能還需要查看這張專業分析師對穆格每股收益預測的互動圖表。

Are Moog Insiders Aligned With All Shareholders?

穆格內部人士是否與所有股東保持一致?

Owing to the size of Moog, we wouldn't expect insiders to hold a significant proportion of the company. But thanks to their investment in the company, it's pleasing to see that there are still incentives to align their actions with the shareholders. Given insiders own a significant chunk of shares, currently valued at US$50m, they have plenty of motivation to push the business to succeed. This would indicate that the goals of shareholders and management are one and the same.

由於穆格的規模,我們預計內部人士不會持有該公司的很大一部分股份。但是,由於他們對公司的投資,令人高興的是,仍然有激勵措施使他們的行動與股東保持一致。鑑於內部人士擁有很大一部分股票,目前價值爲5000萬美元,他們有足夠的動力推動業務走向成功。這將表明股東和管理層的目標是相同的。

While it's always good to see some strong conviction in the company from insiders through heavy investment, it's also important for shareholders to ask if management compensation policies are reasonable. A brief analysis of the CEO compensation suggests they are. The median total compensation for CEOs of companies similar in size to Moog, with market caps between US$4.0b and US$12b, is around US$8.4m.

儘管通過大量投資看到內部人士對公司抱有堅定的信心總是件好事,但股東詢問管理層薪酬政策是否合理也很重要。對首席執行官薪酬的簡要分析表明確實如此。規模與穆格相似的公司的首席執行官的總薪酬中位數約爲840萬美元,市值在40億美元至120億美元之間。

Moog's CEO took home a total compensation package worth US$6.0m in the year leading up to September 2023. That seems pretty reasonable, especially given it's below the median for similar sized companies. CEO compensation is hardly the most important aspect of a company to consider, but when it's reasonable, that gives a little more confidence that leadership are looking out for shareholder interests. It can also be a sign of a culture of integrity, in a broader sense.

穆格首席執行官在截至2023年9月的一年中獲得了價值600萬美元的總薪酬待遇。這似乎很合理,特別是考慮到它低於類似規模公司的中位數。首席執行官薪酬並不是公司最需要考慮的方面,但如果合理,這可以增強領導層關注股東利益的信心。從更廣泛的意義上講,它也可以是誠信文化的標誌。

Does Moog Deserve A Spot On Your Watchlist?

穆格值得在您的關注清單上佔有一席之地嗎?

For growth investors, Moog's raw rate of earnings growth is a beacon in the night. If you need more convincing beyond that EPS growth rate, don't forget about the reasonable remuneration and the high insider ownership. The overarching message here is that Moog has underlying strengths that make it worth a look at. Don't forget that there may still be risks. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Moog that you should be aware of.

對於成長型投資者來說,穆格的原始收益增長率是夜間的燈塔。如果您除了每股收益增長率之外還需要更多說服力,請不要忘記合理的薪酬和較高的內部所有權。這裏的首要信息是,穆格具有潛在的優勢,值得一看。別忘了可能仍然存在風險。例如,我們已經確定了你應該注意的 Moog 的 1 個警告標誌。

There's always the possibility of doing well buying stocks that are not growing earnings and do not have insiders buying shares. But for those who consider these important metrics, we encourage you to check out companies that do have those features. You can access a tailored list of companies which have demonstrated growth backed by significant insider holdings.

買入這樣的股票總是有可能表現不錯 不是 不斷增長的收入和 不要 讓內部人士購買股票。但是,對於那些考慮這些重要指標的人,我們鼓勵您查看具有這些功能的公司。您可以訪問量身定製的公司名單,這些公司在大量內部持股的支持下實現了增長。

Please note the insider transactions discussed in this article refer to reportable transactions in the relevant jurisdiction.

請注意,本文中討論的內幕交易是指相關司法管轄區內應報告的交易。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論