DBG Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300735) Top Owners Are Private Companies With 52% Stake, While 41% Is Held by Individual Investors
DBG Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300735) Top Owners Are Private Companies With 52% Stake, While 41% Is Held by Individual Investors
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over DBG Technology by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The largest shareholder of the company is Mentech Investment Limited with a 52% stake
- Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 私人企業對DBG Technology的重大控制意味着公衆在管理和治理決策方面有更大的影響力。
- 該公司最大的股東是Mentech Investment Limited,持股比例爲52%。
- 所有權研究結合過去的表現數據可以幫助更好地理解股票的機會。
If you want to know who really controls DBG Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300735), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 52% to be precise, is private companies. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果您想知道誰真正掌控了DBG Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300735),那麼您將不得不看一下其股份登記表的構成。該公司持有最多股份的集團,準確地說是約52%的私人企業。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Individual investors, on the other hand, account for 41% of the company's stockholders.
另一方面,個人投資者佔公司股東的41%。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about DBG Technology.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於DBG Technology的什麼。
![ownership-breakdown](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240522/0-a577ec6e7b872a169226cbb1c330710a-0-e525ac2ff9cda1b0dc044e223582cd63.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About DBG Technology?
機構所有權對DBG Technology有什麼影響?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
DBG Technology already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at DBG Technology's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
DBG Technology的股份登記表上已經有了機構。事實上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這表明他們在專業投資者中具有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依賴於這個事實,因爲機構有時會做出不良投資,就像每個人一樣。如果多個機構同時改變他們對股票的看法,您可能會看到股價快速下降。因此,值得看一下DBG Technology下面的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
![earnings-and-revenue-growth](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240522/0-a577ec6e7b872a169226cbb1c330710a-1-3b650bf86e669b9269920525cc57ff5a.png/big)
DBG Technology is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Mentech Investment Limited is the largest shareholder with 52% of shares outstanding. This essentially means that they have extensive influence, if not outright control, over the future of the corporation. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 1.3% and 0.8% of the stock. Zhibiao Su, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.
DBG Technology沒有被對沖基金所持有。我們的數據顯示,Mentech Investment Limited是最大的股東,持有52%的優先股。這基本上意味着他們對公司的未來具有廣泛的影響力,如果不是完全控制。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約1.3%和0.8%的股份。第三大股東是董事會成員之一的Zhibiao Su。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以達到同樣的效果。雖然該公司有一些分析師關注,但它可能沒有得到廣泛關注。因此,它可能在未來得到更多關注。
Insider Ownership Of DBG Technology
DBG Technology的內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人士的精確定義可能是主觀的,幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終向董事會負責。但是,如果他們是創始人或CEO,經理成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in DBG Technology Co., Ltd.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around CN¥311m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們最新的數據表明,內部人員持有DBG Technology Co., Ltd.的一些股票。這是一個非常大的公司,所以看到一些潛在的有意義的一致性是一般都是很積極的。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約CN¥3.11億的股份(按當前價格計算)。看到內部人員有這種投資的水平是好的。您可以在此處檢查是否最近有內部人員購買。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 41% stake in DBG Technology. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
通常是個人投資者的一般公衆持有DBG Technology的41%股份。儘管這種所有權大小可能不足以在他們的利益中影響政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 52%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我們的數據顯示,私人企業持有該公司的52%股份。僅從這個事實本身很難得出任何結論,因此它值得進一步研究誰擁有這些私人企業。有時內部人員或其他相關方通過單獨的私人公司持有公共公司的股份。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for DBG Technology (1 is concerning!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
我認爲查看一家公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但是爲了真正獲得洞察,我們需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們發現了2個關於DBG Technology的警告信號(其中1個令人擔憂!),您在進行投資之前應該了解這些。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。