share_log

Private Companies Who Hold 44% of Powerwin Tech Group Limited (HKG:2405) Gained 25%, Insiders Profited as Well

Private Companies Who Hold 44% of Powerwin Tech Group Limited (HKG:2405) Gained 25%, Insiders Profited as Well

持有Powerwin Tech Group Limited(HKG: 2405)44%股份的私人公司上漲了25%,內部人士也獲利
Simply Wall St ·  05/22 18:38

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Powerwin Tech Group's significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 74% ownership
  • Insider ownership in Powerwin Tech Group is 31%
  • Powerwin Tech Group的私人公司所有權表明,關鍵決策受到更大公衆的股東影響。
  • 共有2家投資者擁有74%的股權,控制該公司大多數股份。
  • Powerwin Tech Group的內部所有權爲31%。

If you want to know who really controls Powerwin Tech Group Limited (HKG:2405), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 44% stake, private companies possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道誰真正控制Powerwin Tech Group Limited (HKG:2405),那麼你必須看其股份登記簿的構成。私人公司擁有44%的股份,是該公司持股最多的團體,也就是說,該團體將從其對公司的投資中獲得最大的收益(或虧損最多)。

While private companies were the group that reaped the most benefits after last week's 25% price gain, insiders also received a 31% cut.

儘管上週25%的價格增長後,私人公司是獲得了最大收益的團體,但內部人員也分到了31%的股份。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Powerwin Tech Group.

在下圖中,我們放大了Powerwin Tech Group的不同所有權團體。

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:2405 Ownership Breakdown May 22nd 2024
SEHK:2405所有權結構2024年5月22日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Powerwin Tech Group?

Powerwin Tech Group缺少機構股東,這告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors often avoid companies that are too small, too illiquid or too risky for their tastes. But it's unusual to see larger companies without any institutional investors.

機構不擁有股票的原因有多種解釋。最常見的是公司相對於管理基金過小,因此機構不必仔細審查公司。也有可能是基金經理人不持有股票,因爲他們不確信該股票表現良好。機構投資者可能並不認爲該業務的歷史增長令人印象深刻,或者可能有其他因素在起作用。您可以自己看到Zibuyu Group的過去營業收入表現。

There are many reasons why a company might not have any institutions on the share registry. It may be hard for institutions to buy large amounts of shares, if liquidity (the amount of shares traded each day) is low. If the company has not needed to raise capital, institutions might lack the opportunity to build a position. On the other hand, it's always possible that professional investors are avoiding a company because they don't think it's the best place for their money. Powerwin Tech Group's earnings and revenue track record (below) may not be compelling to institutional investors -- or they simply might not have looked at the business closely.

公司沒有機構股東的原因有很多,比如流動性(每天交易的股票數量)不足,機構在買入大量股票時可能很難,或者公司沒有募資的需求。另一方面,職業投資者可能會避開某個公司,因爲他們認爲這不是最好的投資場所。Powerwin Tech Group的收入和營收紀錄(如下圖)可能對機構投資者缺乏吸引力----或者他們根本沒有仔細研究該公司的業務。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:2405 Earnings and Revenue Growth May 22nd 2024
SEHK:2405收益和營收增長2024年5月22日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Powerwin Tech Group. Common Excellence International Group Limited is currently the company's largest shareholder with 44% of shares outstanding. With 30% and 0.7% of the shares outstanding respectively, Xiang Rong Li and Lu Yu are the second and third largest shareholders. Lu Yu, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.

對Powerwin Tech Group而言,對沖基金持股不多。目前,Common Excellence International Group Limited是該公司最大的股東,持有44%的已發行股票。Xiang Rong Li和Lu Yu分別持有30%和0.7%的已發行股票,是第二和第三大股東。而Lu Yu是第三大股東,同時也是董事會成員。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 2 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

經過進一步挖掘,我們發現前兩個股東共同控制了公司50%以上的股份,說明他們有相當大的影響力來影響公司的決策。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但考慮到分析師的看法,了解風向也是有意義的。我們的信息表明,該股票沒有任何分析師的覆蓋,因此它可能鮮爲人知。

Insider Ownership Of Powerwin Tech Group

Powerwin Tech Group的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Powerwin Tech Group Limited. It has a market capitalization of just HK$3.1b, and insiders have HK$962m worth of shares in their own names. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們最近的數據表明,內部人員擁有Powerwin Tech Group Limited的相當比例。該公司的市值僅爲31億港幣,而內部人員自己持有9.62億港元的股份,看到內部人員對公司產生了投資的熱情是很好的。要注意的是,值得進一步研究的是,有時內部人員通過對某個私人公司的持股而不是以個人身份利益涉及公開公司。如果這些內部人員最近一直在買入,就值得檢查一下。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 25% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公衆(包括零售投資者)擁有該公司25%的股份,並因此不能輕視他們。雖然這種持股規模可能不足以扭轉政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 44%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們可以看到,私人公司佔已發行股份的44%。私人公司可能是相關方。有時內部人員通過在私人公司中持有股份而涉及公共公司,並不代表他們以個人身份進行投資。雖然難以得出任何普遍結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個可以進行進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Powerwin Tech Group you should know about.

雖然考慮到不同的股東團體對公司的所有權非常值得,但還有其他更重要的因素需要考慮。例如,考慮風險。每個公司都有風險,我們已經發現Powerwin Tech Group存在兩個警戒信號。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果您更願意查看另一傢俱有潛在更強財務狀況的公司,請不要錯過這份由強大財務數據支撐的有趣公司的免費列表。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論