share_log

Private Companies Among Shanghai Jahwa United Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:600315) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 4.6% Price Drop

Private Companies Among Shanghai Jahwa United Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:600315) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 4.6% Price Drop

上海家化聯合有限公司中的私營公司s (SHSE: 600315) 最大的股東,在上週股價下跌4.6%後受到打擊
Simply Wall St ·  05/22 19:05

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant control over Shanghai Jahwa United by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • The largest shareholder of the company is Shanghai Fuxin Fine Chemical Co., Ltd. with a 51% stake
  • 16% of Shanghai Jahwa United is held by Institutions
  • 私營公司對上海Jahwa United的嚴格控制意味着公衆擁有更大的影響管理和治理相關決策的權力
  • 該公司的最大股東是上海富欣精細化工有限公司,持有51%的股份
  • 上海嘉華聯合 16% 的股份由機構持有

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Shanghai Jahwa United Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600315), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 52% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解誰真正控制了上海嘉化聯合有限公司(SHSE: 600315),了解該業務的所有權結構非常重要。我們可以看到,私營公司擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲52%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And following last week's 4.6% decline in share price, private companies suffered the most losses.

繼上週股價下跌4.6%之後,私營公司遭受的損失最大。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Shanghai Jahwa United.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於上海嘉華聯合的什麼。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:600315 Ownership Breakdown May 22nd 2024
SHSE: 600315 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 22 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shanghai Jahwa United?

關於上海嘉華聯隊,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

We can see that Shanghai Jahwa United does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Shanghai Jahwa United's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到,上海嘉華聯合確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到上海嘉華聯隊的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:600315 Earnings and Revenue Growth May 22nd 2024
SHSE: 600315 收益和收入增長 2024 年 5 月 22 日

Shanghai Jahwa United is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Shanghai Fuxin Fine Chemical Co., Ltd. is the largest shareholder with 51% of shares outstanding. This essentially means that they have extensive influence, if not outright control, over the future of the corporation. Shanghai Jiushi (Group) Co., Ltd. is the second largest shareholder owning 4.0% of common stock, and Shanghai Chongyang Strategic Investment Co., Ltd. holds about 2.8% of the company stock.

上海嘉華聯合不歸對沖基金所有。我們的數據顯示,上海富欣精細化工有限公司是最大股東,已發行股份爲51%。這實質上意味着他們對公司的未來具有廣泛的影響力,甚至是完全的控制權。上海久事(集團)有限公司是第二大股東,擁有4.0%的普通股,上海重陽戰略投資有限公司持有公司約2.8%的股份。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Shanghai Jahwa United

上海嘉華聯隊的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our information suggests that Shanghai Jahwa United Co., Ltd. insiders own under 1% of the company. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own CN¥19m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們的信息表明,上海家化聯合有限公司內部人士擁有該公司不到1%的股份。但是,他們可能會通過我們尚未掌握的公司結構獲得間接利益。請記住,這是一家大公司,內部人士擁有價值1900萬元人民幣的股票。絕對值可能比比例份額更重要。看到至少有一部分內部所有權總是件好事,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 32% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公衆——包括散戶投資者——擁有該公司32%的股份,因此不容忽視。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決定與其他大股東不同步,則可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 52%, of the Shanghai Jahwa United stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

私人公司似乎擁有上海嘉華聯合52%的股份。私營公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過控股私營公司而對上市公司擁有權益,而不是以個人身份擁有權益。儘管很難得出任何寬泛的結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個需要進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Shanghai Jahwa United you should know about.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,考慮風險。每家公司都有它們,我們發現了一個你應該知道的上海嘉華聯隊的警告標誌。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論