share_log

Avista (NYSE:AVA) Shareholders Have Endured a 4.7% Loss From Investing in the Stock Three Years Ago

Avista (NYSE:AVA) Shareholders Have Endured a 4.7% Loss From Investing in the Stock Three Years Ago

三年前,阿維斯塔(紐約證券交易所代碼:AVA)的股東因投資該股而遭受了4.7%的損失
Simply Wall St ·  05/23 06:53

While not a mind-blowing move, it is good to see that the Avista Corporation (NYSE:AVA) share price has gained 11% in the last three months. But that doesn't change the fact that the returns over the last three years have been less than pleasing. Truth be told the share price declined 17% in three years and that return, Dear Reader, falls short of what you could have got from passive investing with an index fund.

雖然並不是令人驚歎的舉動,但很高興看到阿維斯塔公司(NYSE:AVA)股價在過去的三個月中上漲了11%。但這並不改變過去三年回報不盡人意的事實。說實話,股價在三年內下跌了17%,親愛的讀者,請注意,這一回報不如您可以從指數基金中獲得的被動投資回報。

It's worthwhile assessing if the company's economics have been moving in lockstep with these underwhelming shareholder returns, or if there is some disparity between the two. So let's do just that.

值得評估公司的經濟狀況是否與這些不盡如人意的股東回報同時發展並步調一致,或者兩者之間是否存在差異。因此,讓我們來看看。

In his essay The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville Warren Buffett described how share prices do not always rationally reflect the value of a business. One way to examine how market sentiment has changed over time is to look at the interaction between a company's share price and its earnings per share (EPS).

在他的文章《格雷厄姆和多德斯維爾超級投資者》中,禾倫·巴菲特描述了股票價格並不總是反映公司價值的合理方式。考慮市場對公司的看法如何發生變化的一個不完美但簡單的方法是將每股收益(EPS)的變化與股價的變動進行比較。股票價格並不總是反映公司價值的合理方式禾倫·巴菲特曾稱,股票價格並不總是合理地反映了企業的價值。檢查市場情緒如何隨時間變化的一種方法是查看公司股價和每股收益(EPS)之間的互動。

Although the share price is down over three years, Avista actually managed to grow EPS by 3.3% per year in that time. Given the share price reaction, one might suspect that EPS is not a good guide to the business performance during the period (perhaps due to a one-off loss or gain). Or else the company was over-hyped in the past, and so its growth has disappointed.

雖然股價在三年內下跌,但阿維斯塔實際上在這段時間內每年將每股收益增長了3.3%。鑑於股價反應,人們可能會懷疑每股收益並不是該時期業務表現的良好指南(可能由於一次性損失或收益)。否則,該公司過去被過度炒作,導致其增長令人失望。

It looks to us like the market was probably too optimistic around growth three years ago. But it's possible a look at other metrics will be enlightening.

我們認爲市場在三年前可能過於看好增長預期,但通過看其他指標可能會更有啓迪。

We note that the dividend seems healthy enough, so that probably doesn't explain the share price drop. We like that Avista has actually grown its revenue over the last three years. But it's not clear to us why the share price is down. It might be worth diving deeper into the fundamentals, lest an opportunity goes begging.

我們注意到分紅看起來足夠健康,所以這可能並不是導致股價下跌的原因。我們很喜歡阿維斯塔在過去三年中實際上增加了其營業收入。但我們不清楚股價爲什麼下跌。在基本面上深入挖掘可能會有機會被忽略。

The graphic below depicts how earnings and revenue have changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image).

下面的圖表顯示了收益和營收隨時間的變化情況(通過單擊圖像揭示確切的值)。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:AVA Earnings and Revenue Growth May 23rd 2024
NYSE:AVA的收益和營收增長2024年5月23日

We consider it positive that insiders have made significant purchases in the last year. Having said that, most people consider earnings and revenue growth trends to be a more meaningful guide to the business. So it makes a lot of sense to check out what analysts think Avista will earn in the future (free profit forecasts).

我們認爲內部人士在過去一年中進行了重要購買是一個積極的信號。儘管如此,大多數人認爲收益和營收增長趨勢是業務更有意義的指南。因此,查看分析師認爲阿維斯塔未來將獲得的收益(免費的利潤預測)是非常有意義的。

What About Dividends?

那麼分紅怎麼樣呢?

When looking at investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. Whereas the share price return only reflects the change in the share price, the TSR includes the value of dividends (assuming they were reinvested) and the benefit of any discounted capital raising or spin-off. It's fair to say that the TSR gives a more complete picture for stocks that pay a dividend. In the case of Avista, it has a TSR of -4.7% for the last 3 years. That exceeds its share price return that we previously mentioned. The dividends paid by the company have thusly boosted the total shareholder return.

在考慮投資回報時,重要的是考慮總股東回報(TSR)和股票回報之間的差異。 TSR包括任何剝離或折讓的資本籌集(基於股息被重新投資的假設),以及任何股息。因此,對於支付慷慨的股息公司而言,TSR通常比股票回報高得多。就中國神威藥業集團而言,其TSR在過去5年中達到了75%。這超過了我們之前提到的股票回報。該公司支付的股息已經提高了總股東回報。總股東回報股票回報而股價回報僅反映了股價的變化,TSR包括股息的價值(假設它們已被再投資)以及任何優惠的資本籌集或分拆的利益。可以說TSR爲支付股息的股票提供了更完整的圖片。在阿維斯塔的情況下,過去3年的TSR爲-4.7%。超過了我們先前提到的股價回報。公司支付的股息已經提高了...股東回報。

A Different Perspective

不同的觀點

Investors in Avista had a tough year, with a total loss of 4.6% (including dividends), against a market gain of about 30%. However, keep in mind that even the best stocks will sometimes underperform the market over a twelve month period. Longer term investors wouldn't be so upset, since they would have made 2%, each year, over five years. If the fundamental data continues to indicate long term sustainable growth, the current sell-off could be an opportunity worth considering. It's always interesting to track share price performance over the longer term. But to understand Avista better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Avista (1 shouldn't be ignored) that you should be aware of.

阿維斯塔的投資者度過了艱難的一年,總虧損爲4.6%(包括股息),而市場收益約爲30%。然而,記住即使是最好的股票有時也會在12個月的時間內表現不佳。長期投資者不會那麼沮喪,因爲他們每年將獲得2%的回報,在過去的五年中持續增長。如果基本數據繼續表明長期可持續增長,當前的拋售可能是值得考慮的機會。跟蹤股價長期表現總是有趣的。但爲了更好地了解阿維斯塔,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們已經確定了3個警告,其中1個不應被忽視。

Avista is not the only stock that insiders are buying. For those who like to find lesser know companies this free list of growing companies with recent insider purchasing, could be just the ticket.

阿維斯塔並不是內部人士正在購買的唯一股票。對於那些想要找到不那麼知名的公司的人,最近有內部人士購買的增長型企業的免費清單可能正是所需。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.

請注意,本文所引述的市場回報反映了目前在美國交易所上市的股票的市場加權平均回報。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論