share_log

With EPS Growth And More, Snap-on (NYSE:SNA) Makes An Interesting Case

With EPS Growth And More, Snap-on (NYSE:SNA) Makes An Interesting Case

隨着每股收益的增長及更多,Snap-on(紐約證券交易所代碼:SNA)是一個有趣的案例
Simply Wall St ·  05/24 06:26

It's common for many investors, especially those who are inexperienced, to buy shares in companies with a good story even if these companies are loss-making. Unfortunately, these high risk investments often have little probability of ever paying off, and many investors pay a price to learn their lesson. Loss making companies can act like a sponge for capital - so investors should be cautious that they're not throwing good money after bad.

許多投資者,尤其是那些沒有經驗的投資者,通常會購買有好故事的公司的股票,即使這些公司虧損。不幸的是,這些高風險投資通常幾乎不可能獲得回報,許多投資者爲吸取教訓付出了代價。虧損的公司可以像海綿一樣爭奪資本,因此投資者應謹慎行事,不要一筆又一筆地投入好錢。

If this kind of company isn't your style, you like companies that generate revenue, and even earn profits, then you may well be interested in Snap-on (NYSE:SNA). While this doesn't necessarily speak to whether it's undervalued, the profitability of the business is enough to warrant some appreciation - especially if its growing.

如果這種公司不是你的風格,你喜歡那些創造收入甚至賺取利潤的公司,那麼你很可能會對Snap-on(紐約證券交易所代碼:SNA)感興趣。儘管這並不一定說明其估值是否被低估,但該業務的盈利能力足以保證一定的升值——尤其是在其增長的情況下。

How Fast Is Snap-on Growing?

Snap-on 的增長速度有多快?

The market is a voting machine in the short term, but a weighing machine in the long term, so you'd expect share price to follow earnings per share (EPS) outcomes eventually. That makes EPS growth an attractive quality for any company. We can see that in the last three years Snap-on grew its EPS by 16% per year. That growth rate is fairly good, assuming the company can keep it up.

市場在短期內是投票機,但從長遠來看是一臺權衡器,因此您預計股價最終將跟隨每股收益(EPS)的結果。這使得每股收益的增長對任何公司來說都是一種有吸引力的品質。我們可以看到,在過去三年中,Snap-on的每股收益每年增長16%。假設公司能夠保持增長率,那麼這個增長率相當不錯。

Careful consideration of revenue growth and earnings before interest and taxation (EBIT) margins can help inform a view on the sustainability of the recent profit growth. Our analysis has highlighted that Snap-on's revenue from operations did not account for all of their revenue in the previous 12 months, so our analysis of its margins might not accurately reflect the underlying business. EBIT margins for Snap-on remained fairly unchanged over the last year, however the company should be pleased to report its revenue growth for the period of 3.7% to US$5.1b. That's progress.

仔細考慮收入增長和息稅前收益(EBIT)利潤率有助於爲近期利潤增長的可持續性提供信息。我們的分析突出表明,Snap-on的收入 來自運營 沒有考慮到他們在過去12個月中的所有收入,因此我們對其利潤率的分析可能無法準確反映基礎業務。去年,Snap-on的息稅前利潤率基本保持不變,但該公司應該樂於報告其收入增長3.7%至51億美元。這就是進步。

You can take a look at the company's revenue and earnings growth trend, in the chart below. Click on the chart to see the exact numbers.

您可以在下表中查看該公司的收入和收益增長趨勢。點擊圖表查看確切的數字。

earnings-and-revenue-history
NYSE:SNA Earnings and Revenue History May 24th 2024
紐約證券交易所:SNA 收益和收入歷史記錄 2024 年 5 月 24 日

While we live in the present moment, there's little doubt that the future matters most in the investment decision process. So why not check this interactive chart depicting future EPS estimates, for Snap-on?

雖然我們生活在當下,但毫無疑問,未來在投資決策過程中最重要。那麼,爲什麼不查看這張描繪Snap-on未來每股收益估計值的交互式圖表呢?

Are Snap-on Insiders Aligned With All Shareholders?

Snap-on內部人士是否與所有股東保持一致?

We would not expect to see insiders owning a large percentage of a US$15b company like Snap-on. But thanks to their investment in the company, it's pleasing to see that there are still incentives to align their actions with the shareholders. We note that their impressive stake in the company is worth US$294m. This suggests that leadership will be very mindful of shareholders' interests when making decisions!

我們預計不會看到內部人士擁有像Snap-on這樣的150億美元公司的很大一部分股份。但是,由於他們對公司的投資,令人高興的是,仍然有激勵措施使他們的行動與股東保持一致。我們注意到,他們在該公司的可觀股份價值2.94億美元。這表明領導層在做出決策時會非常注意股東的利益!

It means a lot to see insiders invested in the business, but shareholders may be wondering if remuneration policies are in their best interest. A brief analysis of the CEO compensation suggests they are. For companies with market capitalisations over US$8.0b, like Snap-on, the median CEO pay is around US$14m.

看到內部人士投資該業務意義重大,但股東們可能想知道薪酬政策是否符合他們的最大利益。對首席執行官薪酬的簡要分析表明確實如此。對於市值超過80億美元的公司,例如Snap-on,首席執行官的薪酬中位數約爲1400萬美元。

The Snap-on CEO received US$11m in compensation for the year ending December 2023. That seems pretty reasonable, especially given it's below the median for similar sized companies. CEO remuneration levels are not the most important metric for investors, but when the pay is modest, that does support enhanced alignment between the CEO and the ordinary shareholders. Generally, arguments can be made that reasonable pay levels attest to good decision-making.

這位Snap-on首席執行官在截至2023年12月的年度中獲得了1100萬美元的薪酬。這似乎很合理,特別是考慮到它低於類似規模公司的中位數。首席執行官薪酬水平並不是投資者最重要的指標,但是當薪酬適度時,這確實支持加強首席執行官與普通股東之間的協調。通常,可以說合理的薪酬水平證明了良好的決策。

Does Snap-on Deserve A Spot On Your Watchlist?

Snap-on 值得在您的關注清單上佔有一席之地嗎?

One important encouraging feature of Snap-on is that it is growing profits. The fact that EPS is growing is a genuine positive for Snap-on, but the pleasant picture gets better than that. Boasting both modest CEO pay and considerable insider ownership, you'd argue this one is worthy of the watchlist, at least. Of course, identifying quality businesses is only half the battle; investors need to know whether the stock is undervalued. So you might want to consider this free discounted cashflow valuation of Snap-on.

Snap-on的一個重要令人鼓舞的特點是利潤不斷增長。每股收益的增長對Snap-on來說確實是一個積極因素,但令人愉快的畫面比這更好。你可能會認爲這位首席執行官薪酬不高,內部所有權相當可觀,至少值得列入關注名單。當然,確定優質企業只是成功的一半;投資者需要知道股票的估值是否被低估。因此,你可能需要考慮Snap-on的這種免費折扣現金流估值。

Although Snap-on certainly looks good, it may appeal to more investors if insiders were buying up shares. If you like to see companies with more skin in the game, then check out this handpicked selection of companies that not only boast of strong growth but have strong insider backing.

儘管Snap-on看起來確實不錯,但如果內部人士買入股票,它可能會吸引更多的投資者。如果你想看到擁有更多風險的公司,那麼看看這些精心挑選的公司,這些公司不僅擁有強勁的增長,而且有強大的內部支持。

Please note the insider transactions discussed in this article refer to reportable transactions in the relevant jurisdiction.

請注意,本文中討論的內幕交易是指相關司法管轄區內應報告的交易。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論