share_log

With 84% Ownership, Stifel Financial Corp. (NYSE:SF) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

With 84% Ownership, Stifel Financial Corp. (NYSE:SF) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

Stifel Financial Corp.(紐約證券交易所代碼:SF)擁有84%的所有權,擁有強大的機構支持
Simply Wall St ·  05/26 10:06

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Stifel Financial's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 15 shareholders
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 鑑於機構持有該股的大量股份,Stifel Financial的股價可能容易受到其交易決策的影響
  • 51% 的業務由前 15 名股東持有
  • 內部人士最近的銷售情況

Every investor in Stifel Financial Corp. (NYSE:SF) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 84% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Stifel Financial Corp.(紐約證券交易所代碼:SF)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有84%所有權的機構。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

鑑於其可支配的資金和研究能力巨大,機構所有權往往具有很大的份量,對於個人投資者而言尤其如此。因此,投資於公司的機構資金中有很大一部分通常是對公司未來的巨大信任票。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Stifel Financial.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Stifel Financial的什麼。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:SF Ownership Breakdown May 26th 2024
紐約證券交易所:SF 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 26 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Stifel Financial?

關於Stifel Financial,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Stifel Financial. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Stifel Financial's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

如你所見,機構投資者持有Stifel Financial的相當數量的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎地依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們有時也會弄錯。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看Stifel Financial的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:SF Earnings and Revenue Growth May 26th 2024
紐約證券交易所:SF 收益和收入增長 2024 年 5 月 26 日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Stifel Financial is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 10% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.8% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.9% by the third-largest shareholder. In addition, we found that Ronald Kruszewski, the CEO has 1.3% of the shares allocated to their name.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會對董事會的決策產生重大影響。Stifel Financial不歸對沖基金所有。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份的10%。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約8.8%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有5.9%的所有權。此外,我們發現首席執行官羅納德·克魯謝夫斯基以其名義分配了1.3%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 15 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過進一步的挖掘,我們發現排名前15位的公司合併所有權爲51%,這表明沒有一個股東對公司擁有重要的控制權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Stifel Financial

Stifel Financial 的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Stifel Financial Corp.. Insiders own US$287m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows a good alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們可以報告說,內部人士確實擁有Stifel Financial Corp的股份。內部人士擁有價值2.87億美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。大多數人會說,這表明股東和董事會之間的利益非常一致。儘管如此,可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 12% stake in Stifel Financial. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有Stifel Financial12%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Stifel Financial that you should be aware of.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經確定了Stifel Financial的兩個警告信號,你應該注意這些信號。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論