share_log

TAL Education Group's (NYSE:TAL) Institutional Investors Lost 9.4% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

TAL Education Group's (NYSE:TAL) Institutional Investors Lost 9.4% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

TAL教育集團(紐約證券交易所代碼:TAL)的機構投資者上週下跌9.4%,但受益於長期漲勢
Simply Wall St ·  05/27 07:37

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies TAL Education Group's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 11 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insider ownership in TAL Education Group is 31%
  • 機構持有大量股份意味着好未來集團的股票價格對其交易行動非常敏感。
  • 前11大股東擁有該公司50%的股份。
  • 好未來集團的內部持股比例爲31%。

A look at the shareholders of TAL Education Group (NYSE:TAL) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 41% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

觀察TAL Education Group(NYSE:TAL)的股東情況可以告訴我們哪個群體最強大。擁有41%股份的機構是該公司擁有最多股份的群體。換句話說,該群體最有可能從其對公司的投資中獲得最大收益(或蒙受最大損失)。

Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 9.4% last week. However, the 95% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

虧損是股東中沒有人願意看到的情況,尤其是上週機構投資者看到其持股的價值下跌了9.4%。然而,股東們在過去的一年中獲得了95%的回報,這或許減輕了他們的痛苦。但他們應該謹防未來的進一步損失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of TAL Education Group.

下圖顯示不同股東群體在好未來集團中的佔比。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:TAL Ownership Breakdown May 27th 2024
NYSE:TAL持股結構分解,截至2024年5月27日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About TAL Education Group?

機構所有權對好未來集團意味着什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

TAL Education Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at TAL Education Group's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

好未來集團的股東名單已經包括機構。事實上,他們在公司中擁有一定的股份,這意味着受到專業投資者的信任。但我們不能僅憑這一點,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資決策,就像每個人一樣。如果多個機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到其股票價格快速下跌。因此,值得看看好未來集團的下面的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:TAL Earnings and Revenue Growth May 27th 2024
NYSE:TAL的收入和營業收入增長,截至2024年5月27日。

Hedge funds don't have many shares in TAL Education Group. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Bangxin Zhang with 27% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 4.2% and 3.0% of the stock. Interestingly, the second-largest shareholder, Yachao Liu is also Chief Operating Officer, again, pointing towards strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

對於好未來集團的股權,對比數據可以看到,持有27%流通股的CEO張邦鑫是最大的股東。換句話說,第二大和第三大股東持有該股的約4.2%和3.0%。有趣的是,第二大股東劉亞超也是COO,這再次表明公司最大股東中存在強烈的內部持股。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 11 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

在深入挖掘後,我們發現前11名股東在該公司擁有50%的股份,這意味着沒有單一的股東對公司擁有顯著的控制權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of TAL Education Group

好未來集團的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of TAL Education Group. Insiders own US$2.3b worth of shares in the US$7.3b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

我們最新的數據表明,內部持股比例合理。內部持有價值爲23億美元的股票,而公司市值爲73億美元。這是相當有意義的。大多數人將會高興地看到,董事會與他們一起進行了投資。你可能希望使用此免費圖表來顯示內部人員最近的交易情況。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 28% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

一般公衆(包括零售投資者)持有該公司28%的股份,因此不能被忽視。雖然持股規模非常可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,則可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

雖然考慮所有擁有一家公司的群體很重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我喜歡更深入地了解公司過去的表現。您可以在以下詳細圖表中找到歷史收益和收入。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論