share_log

Institutional Investors in Expro Group Holdings N.V. (NYSE:XPRO) See US$124m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.

Institutional Investors in Expro Group Holdings N.V. (NYSE:XPRO) See US$124m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.

Expro Group Holdings N.V.(紐約證券交易所代碼:XPRO)的機構投資者上週的市值減少了1.24億美元,儘管長期收益使他們受益。
Simply Wall St ·  05/27 10:55

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Expro Group Holdings' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 6 shareholders own 52% of the company
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 顯著高的機構持股意味着Expro Group Holdings的股價對其交易行爲非常敏感。
  • 前6大股東擁有公司的52%股份。
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Expro Group Holdings N.V. (NYSE:XPRO), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 79% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解Expro Group Holdings N.V.(NYSE:XPRO)真正掌控公司的人,重點是了解該業務的所有權結構。 持有該公司股份最多的集團,準確地說是約79%的機構。 換句話說,該集團可能從其對公司的投資中獲得最大限度的收益(或蒙受最大限度的損失)。

Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$2.5b last week. However, the 24% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

下週,該公司的市值下跌至25億美元后,機構投資者受到最大沖擊。 然而,一年內爲股東帶來了24%的回報可能有所幫助減輕他們的痛苦。 不過,我們認爲他們會密切關注未來所出現的弱點。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Expro Group Holdings, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入了解Expro Group Holdings每種所有者的情況,從下面的圖表開始。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:XPRO Ownership Breakdown May 27th 2024
NYSE:XPRO所有權結構拆分-2024年5月27日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Expro Group Holdings?

機構股東的持股情況對Expro Group Holdings意味着什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Expro Group Holdings. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Expro Group Holdings, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在Expro Group Holdings中持有相當數量的股份。 這可能表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。 不過,最好不要僅僅依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。 他們有時也會犯錯。 如果兩位大型機構投資者嘗試同時拋售股票,很可能會看到股價大幅下跌。 因此,審查Expro Group Holdings的過去收益軌跡(如下所示)是值得的。 當然,還要記住有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:XPRO Earnings and Revenue Growth May 27th 2024
NYSE:XPRO收入和營收增長情況-2024年5月27日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Our data indicates that hedge funds own 10% of Expro Group Holdings. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. Our data shows that FMR LLC is the largest shareholder with 14% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 13% and 10%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

由於機構投資者擁有超過已發行股票的一半,該董事會很可能要關注其偏好。 我們的數據顯示,對Expro Group Holdings進行了10%的對沖基金所有權。 這引起了我的注意,因爲對沖基金有時會嘗試影響管理層,或者引起將爲股東創造近期價值的變革。 我們的數據顯示FMR LLC是最大的股東,持有14%的流通股。 同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行流通股的13%和10%。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 6 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒也是有意義的,以知道風向如何。就我們所知,目前並沒有該公司的分析師覆蓋。因此,可能被忽略了。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of Expro Group Holdings

Expro Group Holdings的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Expro Group Holdings N.V.. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around US$8.4m worth of shares (at current prices). It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們最新的數據顯示,內部人員持有Expro Group Holdings N.V.的股份少於1%。 它是一家相當大的企業,所以董事會成員可能會擁有該公司的重要利益,而不擁有相當的利益。 在這種情況下,他們擁有約840萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。 擁有內部人員所有權總是有好處的,但可能值得檢查那些內部人員是否一直在拋售。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 10% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

普通公衆(包括散戶投資者)擁有該公司10%的股份,因此不能被忽視。儘管該集團不能直接發號施令,但它確實對公司的運作產生了實質性影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Expro Group Holdings that you should be aware of before investing here.

雖然考慮到擁有公司的不同團體非常重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。 例如,在投資此處之前,我們已經發現了Expro Group Holdings的2個警示信號。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論