Institutional Investors in Jushri Technologies, INC. (SZSE:300762) See CN¥728m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.
Institutional Investors in Jushri Technologies, INC. (SZSE:300762) See CN¥728m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.
Key Insights
主要見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Jushri Technologies' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- A total of 12 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 考慮到機構對Jushri Technologies股票的大規模持股,他們的交易決策可能會對其股價造成影響。
- 共有12名投資者擁有公司的大部分股權,擁有50%的所有權。
- 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。
Every investor in Jushri Technologies, INC. (SZSE:300762) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 42% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
Jushri Technologies, INC. (SZSE:300762)的每位投資者都應該認識到最強大的股東群體。該集團持有公司最多的股份數量,準確地說爲42%,就是機構。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 6.7% in value last week. However, the 38% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.
股東不喜歡在投資中虧損,特別是上週看到其持股價值下跌了6.7%的機構投資者。然而,一年38%的股東回報率可能有助於減輕他們的痛苦。然而,他們應該注意將來進一步的損失。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Jushri Technologies.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東對Jushri Technologies能告訴我們什麼。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Jushri Technologies?
機構所有權告訴我們什麼關於Jushri Technologies?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
Jushri Technologies already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Jushri Technologies, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
Jushri Technologies已經有機構佔據了股東名冊,他們持有公司一個可觀的股份。這意味着那些機構的分析師們已經研究了這支股票,他們喜歡它。但像其他任何人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售一支股票,股價大幅下跌是很常見的。因此,審查Jushri Technologies過去的盈利軌跡(如下)是值得的。當然,還有其他要考慮的因素。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Jushri Technologies. The company's largest shareholder is Shanghai Shuangyou Information Technology Co., Ltd., with ownership of 18%. AEGON-Industrial Fund Management Co. Ltd. is the second largest shareholder owning 8.6% of common stock, and Shanghai Institute of Microsystem and Information Technology, Endowment Arm holds about 4.2% of the company stock.
對於Jushri Technologies而言,對沖基金並沒有太多的持股。該公司最大的股東是上海雙友信息技術有限公司,佔有18%的股份。AEGON-Industrial Fund Management Co. Ltd.是第二大股東,持有普通股的8.6%,上海微系統及信息技術研究所的捐贈部門持有公司股票的約4.2%。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 12 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
我們對所有權的深入研究表明,前12名股東合計擁有50%的持股,意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股權。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Jushri Technologies
Jushri Technologies內部股權情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. It is unusual not to have at least some personal holdings by board members, so our data might be flawed. A good next step would be to check how much the CEO is paid.
我們的數據無法確認董事會成員是否持有個人股份。董事會成員至少持有一些個人股份是不尋常的,因此我們的數據可能有缺陷。下一步可行的行動是檢查CEO的薪資。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 40% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
普通公衆,包括零售投資者,在該公司擁有40%的股份,因此不容易被忽視。儘管擁有的份額相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,則可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 18%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我們可以看到私人公司擁有已發行股份的18%。這值得更深入地研究。如果相關方,例如內部人員,對其中一傢俬人公司感興趣,那麼應在年度報告中披露這一點。私人公司也可能對公司具有戰略利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Jushri Technologies , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
雖然考慮公司各個股東群體非常重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,投資風險這個永恒的威脅。我們已經確認了Jushri Technologies的1個警告信號,了解這些信號應該成爲您投資過程的一部分。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。