share_log

Individual Investors Among Maccura Biotechnology Co.Ltd's (SZSE:300463) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 6.5% Price Drop

Individual Investors Among Maccura Biotechnology Co.Ltd's (SZSE:300463) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 6.5% Price Drop

個人投資者是Maccura Biotechnology Co.Ltd(深圳證券交易所代碼:300463)的最大股東,在上週股價下跌6.5%後受到打擊
Simply Wall St ·  05/28 21:12

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Maccura BiotechnologyLtd's significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 46% ownership
  • Insider ownership in Maccura BiotechnologyLtd is 40%
  • 邁克生物的主要個人投資者所有權意味着關鍵決策受到更大公衆股東的影響。
  • 公司分爲25個投資者,共擁有46%的股份。
  • 邁克生物的內部持股爲40%。

If you want to know who really controls Maccura Biotechnology Co.Ltd (SZSE:300463), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 53% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道真正掌控邁克生物股份有限公司(SZSE:300463)的人是誰,那麼你必須看看它的持股人名單構成。我們可以看到,個人投資者擁有該公司53%的所有權。也就是說,該集團將從其對公司的投資中獲得最多(或失去最多)的收益。

While insiders who own 40% came under pressure after market cap dropped to CN¥7.8b last week,individual investors took the most losses.

市值上週下降至78億元后,持股40%的內部人士面臨壓力,而個人投資者最受損失。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Maccura BiotechnologyLtd, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入研究邁克生物股份有限公司的每種所有者類型,從以下圖表開始。

ownership-breakdown
SZSE:300463 Ownership Breakdown May 29th 2024
SZSE:300463 2024年5月29日所有權分佈

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Maccura BiotechnologyLtd?

機構投資者持有邁克生物的情況告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that Maccura BiotechnologyLtd does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Maccura BiotechnologyLtd, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,邁克生物確實擁有機構投資者;他們持有公司股票的很大一部分。這可以表明公司在投資界擁有一定的信譽度。然而,最好不要依賴機構投資者所謂的認可。他們也會犯錯誤。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,往往會看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得注意邁克生物Ltd的過去收益軌跡(以下)。當然,也要考慮其他因素。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:300463 Earnings and Revenue Growth May 29th 2024
SZSE:300463 2024年5月29日盈利和營業收入增長情況

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Maccura BiotechnologyLtd. Our data shows that Yong Tang is the largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. Deng Ming Wang is the second largest shareholder owning 7.5% of common stock, and Lei Guo holds about 5.9% of the company stock.

對於邁克生物Ltd的持股情況,對沖基金並沒有持有太多股票。我們的數據顯示,Yong Tang是最大的股東,持有11%的流通股,Deng Ming Wang是第二大股東,持有7.5%的普通股,Lei Guo持有公司股票的約5.9%。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

經過我們的所有權數據研究,我們發現前25位股東共同擁有不到50%的股份,表明沒有任何個人擁有多數利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構持股比例是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。同樣可以通過研究分析師情緒來實現。由於相當多的分析師都關注着該股票,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Maccura BiotechnologyLtd

邁克生物Ltd的內部持股情況

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Maccura Biotechnology Co.Ltd. Insiders own CN¥3.1b worth of shares in the CN¥7.8b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最新的數據顯示,內部人士在邁克生物股份有限公司擁有合理比例的股份。內部人士在該78億人民幣公司中擁有31億元的股份。這相當有意義。大多數人都會認爲,尤其是在這樣一個規模的公司中,這表明內部人士與股東的利益高度一致。您可以單擊此處查看這些內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public -- including retail investors -- own 53% of Maccura BiotechnologyLtd. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.

普通公衆 - 包括散戶投資者 - 擁有邁克生物的53%股權。由於擁有這麼高的所有權,散戶投資者可以共同在影響股東回報的決策上扮演角色,如股息政策和董事任命。他們也可以行使投票權,在併購或合併方面施加影響,但這可能不會提高盈利能力。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Maccura BiotechnologyLtd better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Maccura BiotechnologyLtd , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

在考慮到公司所有股東的種類時,總是值得思考的。但是,爲了更好地了解邁克生物Ltd,我們需要考慮其他許多因素。例如,不斷存在的投資風險。我們已經確定了2個預警信號,必須在您的投資過程中加以理解。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論