share_log

Qingdao Gaoce Technology Co., Ltd's (SHSE:688556) Market Cap Dropped CN¥391m Last Week; Retail Investors Bore the Brunt

Qingdao Gaoce Technology Co., Ltd's (SHSE:688556) Market Cap Dropped CN¥391m Last Week; Retail Investors Bore the Brunt

青島高策科技股份有限公司(上海證券交易所代碼:688556)的市值上週下降了3.91億元人民幣;散戶投資者首當其衝
Simply Wall St ·  05/29 19:51

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant control over Qingdao Gaoce Technology by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • The top 16 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insider ownership in Qingdao Gaoce Technology is 33%
  • 散戶投資者對青島高測科技的顯著控制意味着普通公衆有更多的權力來影響管理和治理相關的決策。
  • 前16大股東擁有公司50%的股份。
  • 青島高測科技的內部持股比例爲33%。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Qingdao Gaoce Technology Co., Ltd (SHSE:688556), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 47% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解青島高測科技股份有限公司(SHSE:688556)真正的控制者,重要的是理解該企業的所有權結構。擁有47%股權的散戶投資者擁有公司最多的股份。換句話說,這個群體在他們對公司的投資中最可能獲得最多的回報(或者承受最大的風險)。

Following a 4.2% decrease in the stock price last week, retail investors suffered the most losses, but insiders who own 33% stock also took a hit.

上週股價下跌4.2%,散戶投資者遭受了最大的損失,但持有33%股份的內部人員也受到了打擊。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Qingdao Gaoce Technology.

讓我們更仔細地看一下不同類型的股東對青島高測科技有哪些影響。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:688556 Ownership Breakdown May 29th 2024
SHSE:688556所有權分佈2024年5月29日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Qingdao Gaoce Technology?

機構投資者的所有權告訴我們什麼關於青島高測科技?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Qingdao Gaoce Technology. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Qingdao Gaoce Technology's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在青島高測科技中持有相當數量的股權。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這支股票並且他們喜歡它。但就像任何其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。如果多個機構同時改變了對一支股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,查看以下青島高測科技的收入歷史記錄是值得的。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:688556 Earnings and Revenue Growth May 29th 2024
SHSE:688556彙報和營收增長2024年5月29日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Qingdao Gaoce Technology. Qiang Zhang is currently the largest shareholder, with 29% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 4.3% and 2.7% of the stock.

我們注意到,對於青島高測科技,對沖基金沒有重要的投資。目前,張強是最大的股東,持有29%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大的股東持有約4.3%和2.7%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 16 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過更深入的了解,我們發現前16名股東共同擁有公司50%的股份,這意味着沒有單一股東對公司有足夠的控制權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of Qingdao Gaoce Technology

青島高測科技的內部持股

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Qingdao Gaoce Technology Co., Ltd. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful CN¥2.9b stake in this CN¥8.9b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

似乎內部人員擁有青島高測科技股份有限公司的重要比例。看到內部人員在這家市值89億人民幣的公司中擁有有意義的29億人民幣的股份非常有趣。能夠看到這種投資水平是好的。您可以在這裏檢查這些內部人員最近是否一直在買入股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 47% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

普通公衆,包括散戶投資者,持有公司47%的股份,因此不能被輕易忽視。雖然佔有大量股份,但如果決策不符合其他大股東的意願,則這種所有權規模可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Qingdao Gaoce Technology (1 is a bit unpleasant!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體是值得的,但其他更重要的因素更加重要。例如,我們發現了青島高測科技的3個警告(其中1個有點不愉快!)值得在此投資之前注意。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論