share_log

Cricut, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CRCT) Recent 4.7% Pullback Adds to One-year Year Losses, Institutional Owners May Take Drastic Measures

Cricut, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CRCT) Recent 4.7% Pullback Adds to One-year Year Losses, Institutional Owners May Take Drastic Measures

Cricut, Inc. 's(納斯達克股票代碼:CRCT)最近4.7%的回調增加了爲期一年的虧損,機構所有者可能會採取嚴厲措施
Simply Wall St ·  05/30 09:59

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Cricut's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 58% of the company is held by a single shareholder (Petrus Trust Company, LTA)
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 機構的持股比例高,這意味着Cricut的股價對他們的交易行爲非常敏感。
  • 該公司的58%股份由單一股東(彼得魯斯信託公司)持有。
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

A look at the shareholders of Cricut, Inc. (NASDAQ:CRCT) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 68% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

觀察Cricut,Inc.(納斯達克:CRCT)的股東可以告訴我們哪個團體最有影響力。持有該公司股份最多的團隊,大約佔公司股份的68%,是機構。換句話說,該組面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

As a result, institutional investors endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by US$65m. Needless to say, the recent loss which further adds to the one-year loss to shareholders of 30% might not go down well especially with this category of shareholders. Often called "market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. As a result, if the decline continues, institutional investors may be pressured to sell Cricut which might hurt individual investors.

因此,市值下降了6500萬美元后,機構投資者上週遭受了最大的損失。不用說,最近的損失疊加在股東一年的30%損失上,對這類股東尤其不好。通常被稱爲“市場推動者”的機構具有影響任何股票價格動態的重大影響力。因此,如果下跌持續下去,機構投資者可能會受到迫使賣出Cricut的壓力,這可能會傷及個人投資者。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Cricut.

下圖顯示了Cricut不同所有權組的情況。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:CRCT Ownership Breakdown May 30th 2024
納斯達克GS:CRCT所有權分佈2024年5月30日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Cricut?

機構所有權告訴我們關於Cricut的什麼信息?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that Cricut does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Cricut's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到Cricut確實擁有機構投資者;他們持有公司股份的一部分。這表明在專業投資者中具有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時會犯錯誤的投資決策,就像所有人一樣。當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,存在它們處於“擁擠的交易”中的風險。當這樣的交易失敗時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。這種風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面查看Cricut的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事總會更復雜。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:CRCT Earnings and Revenue Growth May 30th 2024
納斯達克GS:CRCT盈利和營收增長2024年5月30日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Cricut is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Petrus Trust Company, LTA is the largest shareholder with 58% of shares outstanding. With such a huge stake in the ownership, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 13% and 1.7%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Ashish Arora, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有超過一半的公司股份,因此他們可以集體行使相當大的影響力。Cricut沒有由對沖基金持有。我們的數據顯示,彼得魯斯信託公司是最大的股東,擁有58%的流通股。由於擁有如此龐大的股權,我們推斷他們對公司的未來有着重要的控制權。與此同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有流通股的13%和1.7%。第二大股東阿什什·阿羅拉(Ashish Arora)還擔任首席執行官。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構持股情況是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以取得相同的結果。相當多的分析師涵蓋了這筆股票,所以你可以很容易地調查預測增長。

Insider Ownership Of Cricut

Cricut的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然內部人士的精確定義可能是主觀的,幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終向董事會負責。但是,如果他們是創始人或CEO,經理成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Cricut, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$1.4b, and insiders have US$230m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,內部人持有Cricut,Inc.的大部分股份。它的市值僅爲14億美元,內部人自己擁有2.3億美元的股份。這相當顯著。大多數人都會說,尤其是在這樣一個規模的公司中,這表明與股東的良好契合度。您可以單擊此處以查看這些內部人是否一直在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 15% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Cricut. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

在Cricut中,普通公衆擁有15%的所有權,其中大部分由個人投資者持有,他們對Cricut有一些影響力。雖然這個團隊不能必然決策,但它確實能夠對公司的運營產生實質性影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 4 warning signs for Cricut (1 is a bit concerning!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

雖然考慮擁有公司的不同團體很值得,但有其他更重要的因素。例如,我們發現了Cricut的4個警告信號(其中1個有點令人擔憂!)在此投資之前,您應該了解這些警告信號。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論