Netac Technology (SZSE:300042) Delivers Shareholders Notable 12% CAGR Over 5 Years, Surging 7.9% in the Last Week Alone
Netac Technology (SZSE:300042) Delivers Shareholders Notable 12% CAGR Over 5 Years, Surging 7.9% in the Last Week Alone
While Netac Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300042) shareholders are probably generally happy, the stock hasn't had particularly good run recently, with the share price falling 29% in the last quarter. On the bright side the returns have been quite good over the last half decade. Its return of 75% has certainly bested the market return!
雖然朗科科技股東們可能會感到普遍高興,但股票近期並沒有表現得特別好,上個季度股價下跌了29%。但好的一面是,在過去的半個世紀裏回報還是相當不錯的,年化回報率高達75%,肯定優於市場回報!
On the back of a solid 7-day performance, let's check what role the company's fundamentals have played in driving long term shareholder returns.
在穩定的七天表現之後,讓我們看看公司的基本面對長期股東回報的影響。
To quote Buffett, 'Ships will sail around the world but the Flat Earth Society will flourish. There will continue to be wide discrepancies between price and value in the marketplace...' By comparing earnings per share (EPS) and share price changes over time, we can get a feel for how investor attitudes to a company have morphed over time.
引用巴菲特的話順便說一下,“船隻將環遊世界,但支持地球平面學會的人將大有可爲。 在市場上,價格和價值之間將繼續存在巨大的差異...”通過比較EPS和股價變化,我們可以了解到投資者對公司的態度隨時間的變化程度。
Netac Technology's earnings per share are down 32% per year, despite strong share price performance over five years.
儘管股價在五年內表現強勁,但朗科科技每股收益年均下降了32%。
This means it's unlikely the market is judging the company based on earnings growth. Since the change in EPS doesn't seem to correlate with the change in share price, it's worth taking a look at other metrics.
這意味着市場不太可能根據收益增長來判斷該公司。由於每股收益的變化似乎與股價的變化無關,因此值得關注其他指標。
In contrast revenue growth of 5.4% per year is probably viewed as evidence that Netac Technology is growing, a real positive. It's quite possible that management are prioritizing revenue growth over EPS growth at the moment.
相比之下,每年5.4%的營業收入增長可能被視爲朗科科技正在增長的證據,這是真正的利好消息。目前管理層很可能優先考慮營收增長而不是每股收益增長。
The company's revenue and earnings (over time) are depicted in the image below (click to see the exact numbers).
以下圖像顯示了公司的營業收入和盈利(隨時間變化)(單擊以查看準確的數字)。
![earnings-and-revenue-growth](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240531/0-a3ba47fe394d090636e5d3176515ccf2-0-658f3946f334756552127f0374d4ef29.png/big)
Take a more thorough look at Netac Technology's financial health with this free report on its balance sheet.
通過這份有關其資產負債表的免費報告,更全面地了解朗科科技的財務狀況。
A Different Perspective
不同的觀點
While the broader market lost about 9.7% in the twelve months, Netac Technology shareholders did even worse, losing 34%. However, it could simply be that the share price has been impacted by broader market jitters. It might be worth keeping an eye on the fundamentals, in case there's a good opportunity. On the bright side, long term shareholders have made money, with a gain of 12% per year over half a decade. If the fundamental data continues to indicate long term sustainable growth, the current sell-off could be an opportunity worth considering. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Netac Technology you should know about.
儘管整個市場在過去12個月中損失了約9.7%,但朗科科技的股東遭受了更大的損失,跌幅高達34%。然而,股價可能僅僅受到了市場的擔憂影響。有必要關注業務基礎情況,以便尋找好的機會。另一方面,長期股東獲得了盈利,在過去的半個世紀中年化收益率高達12%。如果基本數據繼續顯示出長期可持續增長,當前的拋售可能是一個值得考慮的機會。我發現長期股價是業績表現的代理很有趣,但要真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,考慮風險。每家公司都有,我們已經發現了1個朗科科技的警示信號,你應該知道。
If you would prefer to check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of companies that have proven they can grow earnings.
如果您願意查看另一家公司(具有潛在的更好財務狀況),請不要錯過這個免費的公司列表,證明它們可以增長收益。
Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Chinese exchanges.
請注意,本文引用的市場回報反映了目前在中國交易所上市的股票的市場加權平均回報。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。