share_log

With 86% Ownership, Gilead Sciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:GILD) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

With 86% Ownership, Gilead Sciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:GILD) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

吉利德科學公司(納斯達克股票代碼:GILD)擁有 86% 的所有權,擁有強大的機構支持
Simply Wall St ·  05/31 12:48

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Gilead Sciences' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 15 shareholders
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 高機構所有權意味着吉利德科學的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 50% 的業務由前 15 名股東持有
  • 所有權研究以及分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票的機會

Every investor in Gilead Sciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:GILD) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 86% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

吉利德科學公司(納斯達克股票代碼:GILD)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲86%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由於機構所有者擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的分量,尤其是對於個人投資者而言。因此,將大量機構資金投資於公司通常被視爲理想的特徵。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Gilead Sciences.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關吉利德科學的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:GILD Ownership Breakdown May 31st 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:GILD 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 31 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Gilead Sciences?

關於吉利德科學,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

Gilead Sciences already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Gilead Sciences' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

吉利德科學已經在股份登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看吉利德科學的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:GILD Earnings and Revenue Growth May 31st 2024
NASDAQGS: GILD 收益和收入增長 2024 年 5 月 31 日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Gilead Sciences is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Capital Research and Management Company with 12% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 9.8% and 9.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

由於機構投資者擁有已發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。吉利德科學不歸對沖基金所有。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是資本研究與管理公司,已發行股份的12%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的9.8%和9.2%。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 15 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過進一步的挖掘,我們發現排名前15位的公司合併所有權爲50%,這表明沒有一個單一股東對公司擁有重要的控制權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Gilead Sciences

吉利德科學的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Our information suggests that Gilead Sciences, Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$69m worth of shares. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,吉利德科學公司的內部人士擁有該公司不到1%的股份。由於它是一家大公司,我們只期望內部人士擁有其中的一小部分。但值得注意的是,他們擁有價值6900萬美元的股票。在這種情況下,看看這些內部人士是在買入還是賣出可能會更有趣。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 14% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司14%的股份,因此不容忽視。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 4 warning signs for Gilead Sciences you should know about.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,考慮風險。每家公司都有它們,我們發現了你應該知道的吉利德科學的4個警告信號。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論