share_log

Shareholders May Not Be So Generous With Ooma, Inc.'s (NYSE:OOMA) CEO Compensation And Here's Why

Shareholders May Not Be So Generous With Ooma, Inc.'s (NYSE:OOMA) CEO Compensation And Here's Why

股東對Ooma, Inc. 可能不會那麼慷慨。”s(紐約證券交易所代碼:OOMA)首席執行官薪酬及原因如下
Simply Wall St ·  05/31 15:12

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Ooma will host its Annual General Meeting on 6th of June
  • CEO Eric Stang's total compensation includes salary of US$568.8k
  • Total compensation is 225% above industry average
  • Ooma's three-year loss to shareholders was 55% while its EPS grew by 14% over the past three years
  • ooma將於6月6日舉行年度股東大會。
  • CEO Eric Stang的總薪酬包括58.88萬美元的工資。
  • 總補償比行業平均水平高225%。
  • 過去三年,ooma的股東損失了55%,而其每股收益增長了14%。

Shareholders of Ooma, Inc. (NYSE:OOMA) will have been dismayed by the negative share price return over the last three years. What is concerning is that despite positive EPS growth, the share price has not tracked the trend in fundamentals. These are some of the concerns that shareholders may want to bring up at the next AGM held on 6th of June. They could also influence management through voting on resolutions such as executive remuneration. We discuss below why we think shareholders should be cautious of approving a raise for the CEO at the moment.

ooma,Inc. (NYSE: OOMA)的股東在過去三年中遭受負面股價回報,令人失望。令人擔憂的是,儘管每股收益增長爲正,但股價未能跟隨基本趨勢。這些都是股東可能想在下一個於6月6日舉行的股東大會上提出的關注點。他們還可以通過投票審議如執行薪酬之類的決議來影響管理層。我們在下面討論爲什麼我們認爲股東現在應該謹慎批准CEO的加薪。

How Does Total Compensation For Eric Stang Compare With Other Companies In The Industry?

Eric Stang的總薪酬與行業中的其他公司相比如何?

According to our data, Ooma, Inc. has a market capitalization of US$233m, and paid its CEO total annual compensation worth US$4.4m over the year to January 2024. Notably, that's a decrease of 12% over the year before. We think total compensation is more important but our data shows that the CEO salary is lower, at US$569k.

根據我們的數據,ooma,Inc.的市值爲2.33億美元,其CEO在截至2024年1月的一年中獲得總年薪440萬美元。值得注意的是,這是比前一年減少了12%。我們認爲總薪酬更爲重要,但我們的數據顯示,CEO的工資更低,爲58.9萬美元。

For comparison, other companies in the American Software industry with market capitalizations ranging between US$100m and US$400m had a median total CEO compensation of US$1.3m. This suggests that Eric Stang is paid more than the median for the industry. Moreover, Eric Stang also holds US$9.8m worth of Ooma stock directly under their own name, which reveals to us that they have a significant personal stake in the company.

相比之下,在市值介於1億美元和4億美元之間的美國軟件行業中,其他公司的總CEO薪酬中位數爲130萬美元。這表明Eric Stang的薪酬高於行業中位數。此外,Eric Stang還直接持有價值980萬美元的ooma股票,這向我們展示了他在該公司擁有重要的個人利益。

Component 2024 2023 Proportion (2024)
Salary US$569k US$550k 13%
Other US$3.8m US$4.4m 87%
Total Compensation US$4.4m US$5.0m 100%
組成部分 2024 2023 比例(2024年)
薪資 569,000美元 550000美元 13%
其他 380萬美元 440萬美元 87%
總補償 440萬美元 500萬美元 100%

Speaking on an industry level, nearly 16% of total compensation represents salary, while the remainder of 84% is other remuneration. Ooma pays a modest slice of remuneration through salary, as compared to the broader industry. It's important to note that a slant towards non-salary compensation suggests that total pay is tied to the company's performance.

從行業層面來看,近16%的總薪酬代表工資,其餘84%的薪酬是其他報酬。與更廣泛的行業相比,ooma通過工資支付較少的報酬。需要注意的是,傾向於非工資報酬表明總薪酬與公司的業績有關。

ceo-compensation
NYSE:OOMA CEO Compensation May 31st 2024
NYSE: OOMA的CEO薪酬於2024年5月31日

A Look at Ooma, Inc.'s Growth Numbers

對ooma,Inc.的增長數字進行評估

Ooma, Inc. has seen its earnings per share (EPS) increase by 14% a year over the past three years. In the last year, its revenue is up 8.8%.

在過去的三年中,ooma,Inc.的每股收益年增長率爲14%。在過去一年中,其營業收入增長了8.8%。這表明該公司最近有所改善,對股東來說是一個好消息。很高興看到收入呈上升趨勢,這與良好的業務狀況一致。歷史表現有時可以是預測未來的良好指標,但如果您想窺探公司的未來,您可能會對此免費的分析師預測可視化感興趣。

This demonstrates that the company has been improving recently and is good news for the shareholders. It's nice to see revenue heading northwards, as this is consistent with healthy business conditions. Historical performance can sometimes be a good indicator on what's coming up next but if you want to peer into the company's future you might be interested in this free visualization of analyst forecasts.

ooma,Inc.是否是一個好的投資?在過去的三年中,股價回報爲-55%,這肯定不會讓ooma,Inc.的股東感到滿意。因此,股東可能希望公司在CEO薪酬上慷慨一些。過去幾年股東持有的股票價值下跌的事實也令人不安。股票的波動與公司的盈利增長不一致,而理想情況下應該朝着相同的方向前進。當收益增長時,股東希望知道是什麼阻礙了股票的發展。即將舉行的股東大會將是股東提問董事會關鍵問題的機會,例如CEO薪酬或股東可能存在的其他問題,並重新審視他們關於公司的投資論點。

Has Ooma, Inc. Been A Good Investment?

CEO薪酬可能會對業績產生巨大影響,但這只是其中的一個因素。這就是爲什麼我們進行了一些深入挖掘,並確定了ooma的1個警告跡象,您在投資之前應該了解。

The return of -55% over three years would not have pleased Ooma, Inc. shareholders. So shareholders would probably want the company to be less generous with CEO compensation.

在過去的三年中,-55%的回報率不會讓ooma,Inc.的股東感到愉悅。因此,股東可能希望公司在CEO薪酬上慷慨一些。股東在過去幾年中持有的股票價值下跌的事實也令人不安。股票的運動與公司的盈利增長不一致,而這理想情況下應該是同向的。股東希望知道股票下跌的原因,尤其是在收益增長的情況下。即將舉行的股東大會將是股東就當下熱點問題,如CEO薪酬或可能存在的其他問題向董事會提問的機會,並重新審視他們關於公司的投資論點。

In Summary...

總之……

The fact that shareholders are sitting on a loss on the value of their shares in the past few years is certainly disconcerting. The stock's movement is disjointed with the company's earnings growth, which ideally should move in the same direction. Shareholders would be keen to know what's holding the stock back when earnings have grown. The upcoming AGM will be a chance for shareholders to question the board on key matters, such as CEO remuneration or any other issues they might have and revisit their investment thesis with regards to the company.

過去幾年中股東的股票價值損失的事實的確令人擔憂。股票的波動與公司的盈利增長不一致,而理想情況下應該朝着相同的方向前進。股東希望知道是什麼阻礙了股票的發展,而盈利增長確實存在。即將舉行的股東大會將是股東詢問董事會關鍵問題的機會,例如CEO薪酬或股東可能存在的其他問題,並重新審視他們關於公司的投資論點。

CEO compensation can have a massive impact on performance, but it's just one element. That's why we did some digging and identified 1 warning sign for Ooma that you should be aware of before investing.

CEO薪酬可能會對業績產生巨大影響,但這只是其中的一個因素。這就是爲什麼我們進行了一些深入挖掘,並確定了ooma的1個警告跡象,您在投資之前應該了解。

Switching gears from Ooma, if you're hunting for a pristine balance sheet and premium returns, this free list of high return, low debt companies is a great place to look.

轉換關注點,如果您在尋找負債低、回報率高的公司,則這份免費的高回報、低負債公司列表是一個不錯的選擇。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論