share_log

Insiders Were the Key Beneficiaries as DongHua Testing Technology Co. , Ltd.'s (SZSE:300354) Market Cap Rises to CN¥5.5b

Insiders Were the Key Beneficiaries as DongHua Testing Technology Co. , Ltd.'s (SZSE:300354) Market Cap Rises to CN¥5.5b

內部人士是主要受益者,因爲東華測試技術有限公司s (SZSE: 300354) 市值升至55億元人民幣
Simply Wall St ·  05/31 19:13

Key Insights

主要見解

  • DongHua Testing Technology's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • 57% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
  • Institutions own 23% of DongHua Testing Technology
  • 東華測試技術的重要內部股權表明公司擴張的內在利益
  • 前2名股東持有57%的業務
  • 機構擁有東華測試技術的23%

Every investor in DongHua Testing Technology Co. , Ltd. (SZSE:300354) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 55% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

東華測試股份有限公司(SZSE:300354)的每一位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。個人內部股東持有公司的最大股份達55%。換句話說,該群體將從其對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最多)。

As a result, insiders were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 9.2% gain.

因此,內部人成爲上週9.2%漲幅的最大受益者。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of DongHua Testing Technology, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入探討東華測試技術的各種所有者類型,從以下的圖表開始。

ownership-breakdown
SZSE:300354 Ownership Breakdown May 31st 2024
SZSE:300354所有權構成 2024年5月31日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About DongHua Testing Technology?

機構所有權告訴我們東華測試技術的什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

DongHua Testing Technology already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of DongHua Testing Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

東華測試技術已經有機構在股東名冊上了。他們確實擁有相當大的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資社區中有一定的信譽度。但是,最好小心依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也會犯錯誤。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖出售股票,股價下跌也是很常見的。因此,最好檢查東華測試技術的過去盈利軌跡(如下所示)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:300354 Earnings and Revenue Growth May 31st 2024
SZSE:300354收入和營收增長2024年5月31日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in DongHua Testing Technology. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Shigang Liu with 49% of shares outstanding. Bank of Communications Schroder Fund Management Co., Ltd. is the second largest shareholder owning 8.1% of common stock, and Mian Luo holds about 5.0% of the company stock.

我們注意到,對於東華測試技術,對沖基金沒有實質性的投資。查看我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是劉實剛,持有49%的流通股。通聯基金管理有限責任公司是第二大股東,擁有普通股的8.1%,羅緬持有公司股票的約5.0%。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前2名股東擁有該公司的大部分所有權,這意味着他們足夠強大,可以影響公司的決策。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of DongHua Testing Technology

東華測試技術的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

It seems that insiders own more than half the DongHua Testing Technology Co. , Ltd. stock. This gives them a lot of power. That means they own CN¥3.1b worth of shares in the CN¥5.5b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

似乎內部人擁有東華測試技術股票的一半以上。這賦予了他們很大的權力。這意味着他們擁有CN¥31億的CN¥55億公司股票。這非常重要。大多數人會認爲這是一個積極的跡象,表明與股東的強烈的一致性。單擊此處以查看內部人是否一直在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 22% stake in DongHua Testing Technology. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

通常是個人投資者的公衆持有DongHua Testing Technology的22%的股權。儘管這種所有權的大小可能不足以在其支持中產生政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for DongHua Testing Technology you should know about.

我認爲查看一個公司的所有者是非常有趣的。但是,爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。考慮一下風險,例如。每個公司都面臨這些風險,我們已經發現了DongHua Testing Technology的1個警示標誌,您應該知道。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論