A Great Week That Adds to Alliant Energy Corporation's (NASDAQ:LNT) One-year Returns, Institutional Investors Who Own 80% Must Be Happy
A Great Week That Adds to Alliant Energy Corporation's (NASDAQ:LNT) One-year Returns, Institutional Investors Who Own 80% Must Be Happy
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Alliant Energy's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 13 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 機構持股比例高意味着美國聯合能源的股票價格受機構交易行爲影響較大。
- 共有13個投資者擁有該公司的大多數股份,持股比例爲50%。
- 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。
A look at the shareholders of Alliant Energy Corporation (NASDAQ:LNT) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 80% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
看看美國聯合能源股份有限公司(納斯達克股票代碼:LNT)的股東可以告訴我們哪個團體最具權力。持有公司股份最多的團體,佔公司股份的約80%,是機構。換句話說,該團體在其對公司的投資中將獲得最多(或最少)的利益。
Last week's 3.8% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. The one-year return on investment is currently 2.7% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.
上週的3.8%收益意味着機構投資者處於正面的情況,即使該公司已經表現出強勁的長期趨勢。目前的一年投資回報率爲2.7%,上週的收益將受到更多的歡迎。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Alliant Energy.
讓我們更詳細地看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們有關美國聯合能源的信息。
![ownership-breakdown](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240606/0-8e704c38f4839798d8cee840c9371598-0-48e2212e554566b23cc623e0a5ff8eb5.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Alliant Energy?
機構持股情況告訴我們關於美國聯合能源的一些信息。
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
We can see that Alliant Energy does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Alliant Energy's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到美國聯合能源確實擁有機構投資者,他們持有公司的很大一部分股份。這表明該公司在投資界具有一定的信譽度。但是,最好謹慎依賴於機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也會犯錯。當多個機構擁有股票時,總會存在一個“擁擠交易”的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。這種風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到美國聯合能源的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是更爲複雜。
![earnings-and-revenue-growth](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240606/0-8e704c38f4839798d8cee840c9371598-1-333f67e5dfbdf6e0f12a837080ccb689.png/big)
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Alliant Energy. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 12%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 9.2% and 6.5%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
機構投資者擁有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們一起可能會對董事會決策產生很大影響。對於Alliant Energy,對沖基金擁有的股份不多。該公司最大的股東是The Vanguard Group,Inc.,持有12%的股份。同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有公司流通股的9.2%和6.5%。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 13 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
在我們的所有權數字中仔細看看,前13名股東擁有的股權合計爲50%,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股權。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
儘管有道理去研究一家公司的機構所有權數據,但了解分析師的觀點也很有道理,以便知道市場的風向。由於相當多的分析師涵蓋了該股票,因此您可以很容易地研究預測的增長。
Insider Ownership Of Alliant Energy
美國聯合能源的內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Alliant Energy Corporation in their own names. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$26m worth of shares (at current prices). In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的數據表明,內部人以自己的名義持有美國聯合能源公司的股份不到1%。這是一家非常大的公司,因此看到內部人擁有該公司的大部分股份會感到驚訝。雖然他們的持股量不到1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員共擁有價值2600萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。在這種情況下,更有趣的是看看這些內部人是否一直在購買或出售。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 19% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Alliant Energy. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
擁有19%的一般公衆(主要是個人投資者)在美國聯合能源具有一定的影響力。儘管擁有的股份數量可觀,但如果決策不符合其他大股東的決策,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Alliant Energy (including 1 which is significant) .
我覺得查看公司確切的所有者非常有趣。但是,爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。出於這個目的,你應該學習我們發現的兩個警告信號,其中一個非常重要。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。