share_log

Hunan Lead Power Technology Group Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300530) Last Week's 21% Decline Must Have Disappointed Private Companies Who Have a Significant Stake

Hunan Lead Power Technology Group Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300530) Last Week's 21% Decline Must Have Disappointed Private Companies Who Have a Significant Stake

領湃科技集團有限公司(SZSE:300530)上週下跌21%,一定令佔重要股權的私人企業失望。
Simply Wall St ·  06/05 19:18

Key Insights

主要見解

  • The considerable ownership by private companies in Hunan Lead Power Technology Group indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 67% ownership
  • Insider ownership in Hunan Lead Power Technology Group is 35%
  • 湖南領湃科技集團的私營公司所持有的大量股權表明,它們共同在管理和業務策略方面具有更大的發言權。
  • 共有2名投資者擁有該公司的67%所有權。
  • 領湃科技的內部持股比例爲35%。

A look at the shareholders of Hunan Lead Power Technology Group Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300530) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 40% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

觀察湖南領湃科技集團股份有限公司(SZSE:300530)的股東,可以告訴我們哪個群體最爲強大。持有最多股權的是持股40%的私營公司群體。換句話說,該群體將從其對公司的投資中獲得最大的收益(或承受最大的風險)。

While insiders, who own 35% shares weren't spared from last week's CN¥789m market cap drop, private companies as a group suffered the maximum losses

上週CN¥7.89億市值下跌,內部持有35%股份的股東並未倖免,而私營公司群體則遭受最大的損失。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Hunan Lead Power Technology Group, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入研究湖南領湃科技集團的每一類股東,首先從下面的圖表開始。

ownership-breakdown
SZSE:300530 Ownership Breakdown June 5th 2024
SZSE:300530所有權分佈2024年6月5日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hunan Lead Power Technology Group?

機構所有權告訴我們有關湖南領湃科技集團的哪些信息? 持有湖南領湃科技集團不到5%的是機構投資者。這表明一些基金關注該公司,但許多基金尚未購買其股票。如果該企業從此變得更加強勁,我們可能會看到更多機構渴望購買該股票的情況。有時候,當幾個大型機構想要同時購買某個股票時,我們會看到股價上漲。下面你可以看到收益和營業收入的歷史,這可能有助於考慮更多機構投資者是否想要購買該股票。當然,還有很多其他因素需要考慮。

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

Less than 5% of Hunan Lead Power Technology Group is held by institutional investors. This suggests that some funds have the company in their sights, but many have not yet bought shares in it. If the business gets stronger from here, we could see a situation where more institutions are keen to buy. We sometimes see a rising share price when a few big institutions want to buy a certain stock at the same time. The history of earnings and revenue, which you can see below, could be helpful in considering if more institutional investors will want the stock. Of course, there are plenty of other factors to consider, too.

SZSE:300530收入和收益增長2024年6月5日

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:300530 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 5th 2024
我們注意到,對湖南領湃科技集團沒有意義的投資來自對沖基金。我們的數據顯示,恒彥宏旗投資有限公司是持有35%流通股的最大股東,蔡志華是持有31%普通股的第二大股東,Vered Holdings有限公司持有該公司股票的約4.6%。

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Hunan Lead Power Technology Group. Our data shows that Hengyan Hongqi Investment Co., Ltd. is the largest shareholder with 35% of shares outstanding. Zhihua Cai is the second largest shareholder owning 31% of common stock, and Vered Holdings Co., Ltd. holds about 4.6% of the company stock.

湖南領湃科技集團內部持股 看起來內部人持有湖南領湃科技集團股份相當比例。市值僅爲CN¥2.9億,內部人自己名下的股份價值爲1億。看到內部人在企業中有如此大的投資非常棒。值得注意的是,如果內部人沒有最近購買股票,那麼檢查一下是否有可能。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前2名股東擁有該公司的大部分所有權,這意味着他們足夠強大,可以影響公司的決策。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

儘管我們需要研究一個公司的機構所有權數據是有道理的,但也需要研究分析師的情緒來了解市場趨勢。我們目前沒有發現任何關於該股票的分析師報道,所以該公司可能不受廣泛持有。

Insider Ownership Of Hunan Lead Power Technology Group

普通公衆個體投資者持有湖南領湃科技集團21%的股份。儘管股份比例相當大,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,這可能不足以改變公司政策。

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Hunan Lead Power Technology Group Co., Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥2.9b, and insiders have CN¥1.0b worth of shares in their own names. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

看起來私營公司群體擁有湖南領湃科技集團股票的40%。僅從這一事實中很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究所有擁有這些私人公司的人。有時,內部人或其他相關人士通過另一個單獨的私人公司持有上市公司的股份。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 21% stake in Hunan Lead Power Technology Group. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

查看公司所有者確實很有趣。但是,爲了真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經確定了湖南領湃科技集團的2個警示信號,您應該注意一下。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 40%, of the Hunan Lead Power Technology Group stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

看起來,私人公司持有湖南領湃科技集團40%的股票。僅憑這個事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究一下私人公司的所有者是誰。有時內部人員或其他相關方會通過單獨的私人公司持有公共公司的股份。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Hunan Lead Power Technology Group that you should be aware of.

查看公司所有者確實很有趣。但是,爲了真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經確定了湖南領湃科技集團的2個警示信號,您應該注意一下。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果您更喜歡覈對具有潛在優越財務狀況的其他公司,則不要錯過此免費的備有強大財務數據支持的有趣公司列表。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論