share_log

With 80% Ownership of the Shares, RLI Corp. (NYSE:RLI) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 80% Ownership of the Shares, RLI Corp. (NYSE:RLI) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

擁有80%股權的rli保險(紐交所: RLI)嚴重受機構所有者控制。
Simply Wall St ·  06/04 06:38

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies RLI's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions

  • A total of 13 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership

  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock

  • 高機構所有權意味着RLI的股價對其交易行爲很敏感

  • 共有13名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲51%

  • 所有權研究以及分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票的機會

If you want to know who really controls RLI Corp. (NYSE:RLI), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry.  The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 80% to be precise, is institutions.   That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道誰真正控制了RLI公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:RLI),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。持有公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲80%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果股價下跌,則損失最大)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors.  Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.  

由於機構可以獲得大量資本,因此其市場走勢往往會受到散戶或個人投資者的嚴格審查。因此,將大量機構資金投資於公司通常被視爲一種理想的特徵。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of RLI.

在下圖中,我們放大了RLI的不同所有權組。

NYSE:RLI Ownership Breakdown June 4th 2024

紐約證券交易所:RLI 所有權明細 2024 年 6 月 4 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About RLI?

關於RLI,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

We can see that RLI does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock.  This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does.  When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see RLI's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到,RLI確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到RLI的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事中總是有更多內容。

NYSE:RLI Earnings and Revenue Growth June 4th 2024

紐約證券交易所:RLI 收益和收入增長 2024 年 6 月 4 日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences.    RLI is not owned by hedge funds.      The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 9.9% of shares outstanding.        Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 9.6% and 7.8%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.  

由於機構投資者擁有已發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。RLI 不歸對沖基金所有。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份爲9.9%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的9.6%和7.8%。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 13 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.  

經過進一步的挖掘,我們發現前13名股東擁有該公司的總所有權爲51%,這表明沒有一個單一股東對公司擁有重大控制權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance.   Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.  

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲你的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種很好的做法。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此您可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of RLI

RLI 的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count.  Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同國家對內部人員的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

We can report that insiders do own shares in RLI Corp..   The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$255m. Most would see this as a real positive.  It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.  

我們可以報告說,內部人士確實擁有RLI Corp的股份。內部人士持有價值2.55億美元的大量股份。大多數人會認爲這是一個真正的積極因素。很高興看到內部人士的這種投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 16% stake in RLI.   While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有RLI16%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.    To that end, you should learn about the   2 warning signs we've spotted with RLI (including 1 which is concerning) .  

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。爲此,你應該了解我們在RLI中發現的2個警告信號(包括一個令人擔憂的信號)。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論