share_log

Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. (NYSE:PB) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 81%

Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. (NYSE:PB) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 81%

富裕銀行股股份有限公司(紐約證券交易所:PB)是擁有 81% 的機構投資者中的最愛
Simply Wall St ·  06/04 06:03

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Prosperity Bancshares' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions

  • A total of 12 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership

  • Insiders have been selling lately

  • 鑑於機構持有該股的大量股份,繁榮銀行的股價可能容易受到其交易決策的影響

  • 共有12名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲51%

  • 業內人士最近一直在拋售

Every investor in Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. (NYSE:PB) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups.  The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 81% to be precise, is institutions.  Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

繁榮銀行股份有限公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:PB)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲81%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors.  As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.  

由於機構所有者擁有龐大的資源和流動性,因此他們的投資決策往往具有很大的分量,尤其是對於個人投資者而言。因此,投資於公司的大量機構資金通常被視爲積極的屬性。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Prosperity Bancshares.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關繁榮銀行的哪些信息。

NYSE:PB Ownership Breakdown June 4th 2024

紐約證券交易所:PB 所有權明細 2024 年 6 月 4 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Prosperity Bancshares?

關於繁榮銀行股票,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

Prosperity Bancshares already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company.  This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does.  It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Prosperity Bancshares, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

繁榮銀行已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看繁榮銀行過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

NYSE:PB Earnings and Revenue Growth June 4th 2024

紐約證券交易所:PB 收益和收入增長 2024 年 6 月 4 日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences.    We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Prosperity Bancshares.      Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 10% of shares outstanding.       BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 8.8% of common stock, and Victory Capital Management Inc. holds about 6.4% of the company stock.      Furthermore, CEO David Zalman is the owner of 0.9% of the company's shares.  

由於機構投資者擁有已發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對繁榮銀行進行有意義的投資。我們的數據顯示,Vanguard Group, Inc.是最大股東,已發行股份的10%。貝萊德公司是第二大股東,擁有8.8%的普通股,勝利資本管理公司持有該公司約6.4%的股份。此外,首席執行官戴維·扎爾曼持有該公司0.9%的股份。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 12 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.  

仔細觀察我們的所有權數據後發現,前12名股東的總所有權爲51%,這意味着沒有一個股東佔多數。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance.   Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.  

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲你的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種很好的做法。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此您可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Prosperity Bancshares

繁榮銀行股份的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count.  Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。管理層最終向董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行董事會成員的情況並不少見,特別是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Prosperity Bancshares, Inc..   The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$248m. Most would see this as a real positive.  If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can  click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.  

我們可以報告說,內部人士確實擁有Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.的股份。內部人士持有價值2.48億美元的大量股份。大多數人會認爲這是一個真正的積極因素。如果您想探討內幕調整問題,可以點擊此處查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 15% stake in Prosperity Bancshares.   While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有繁榮銀行15%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.    Take risks for example - Prosperity Bancshares has   1 warning sign  we think you should be aware of.  

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。以風險爲例——繁榮銀行有1個警告信號,我們認爲你應該注意。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論