share_log

IHS Holding Limited's (NYSE:IHS) Largest Shareholders Are Retail Investors Who Were Rewarded as Market Cap Surged US$53m Last Week

IHS Holding Limited's (NYSE:IHS) Largest Shareholders Are Retail Investors Who Were Rewarded as Market Cap Surged US$53m Last Week

紐交所上市公司IHS Holding Limited(NYSE:IHS)最大的股東是零售投資者,隨着市值上漲53百萬美元,他們得到了回報。
Simply Wall St ·  06/06 15:16

Key Insights

主要見解

  • IHS Holding's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • A total of 3 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Institutions own 12% of IHS Holding
  • IHS Holding的重要零售投資者持股表明關鍵決策受到較大公衆股東的影響。
  • 總計3名投資者持有該公司51%的所有權。
  • 機構擁有IHS Holding的12%。

A look at the shareholders of IHS Holding Limited (NYSE:IHS) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 26% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看一下IHS Holding Limited (NYSE: IHS) 的股東,可以幫助我們了解哪個集團最爲強大。持有該公司股份的零售投資者佔26%,也就意味着他們面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

As a result, retail investors collectively scored the highest last week as the company hit US$1.2b market cap following a 4.8% gain in the stock.

結果,由於股票上漲4.8%,公司市值達到12億美元,零售投資者上個星期整體得分最高。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about IHS Holding.

讓我們仔細研究一下IHS Holding的不同股東類型可以給我們帶來什麼。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:IHS Ownership Breakdown June 6th 2024
紐交所:IHS所有權細分2024年6月6日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About IHS Holding?

機構的持股情況對IHS Holding有何影響呢?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that IHS Holding does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see IHS Holding's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到IHS Holding確實擁有機構投資者,並且他們掌握着公司的相當一部分股份。這可能表明公司在投資界擁有一定的信譽度。然而,最好不要過分依賴所謂的機構投資者的認可。他們也會有錯誤。當多個機構擁有股票時,總會存在着“擁擠交易”的風險。如果這種交易出現問題,多個機構可能會爭相快速賣出股票。在沒有成長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以下面查看IHS Holding的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更爲複雜的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:IHS Earnings and Revenue Growth June 6th 2024
紐交所:IHS 2024年6月6日營收和收入增長

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in IHS Holding. Our data shows that MTN Group Limited is the largest shareholder with 26% of shares outstanding. Wendel is the second largest shareholder owning 19% of common stock, and Korea Investment Corporation holds about 6.5% of the company stock. In addition, we found that Sam Darwish, the CEO has 3.8% of the shares allocated to their name.

我們注意到對IHS Holding的投資不具備實質性意義。我們的數據顯示MTN集團有最多的股份,佔已發行股份的26%。Wendel是第二大股東,擁有該公司普通股的19%,並且韓國投資公司持有該公司股票的約6.5%。此外,我們發現首席執行官Sam Darwish擁有3.8%的股票。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

總的來說,包括散戶投資者在內,公衆擁有公司的14%的股份,因此不能輕易忽視。儘管這種所有權的規模可能不足以在他們的利益方面影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of IHS Holding

IHS Holding的內部擁有股權。股東可能會有興趣了解到。內部人員持有價值7200萬美元的股份,多數人會看到這是一個真正的優勢。大多數人會說這顯示了股東和管理層之間的利益一致性。不過,最好檢查這些內部人員是否一直在出售股票。

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in IHS Holding Limited. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$72m. Most would see this as a real positive. Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

持有26%的公衆股東(主要是個人投資者)對IHS Holding具有一定的影響力。雖然這種所有權的規模可能不足以在政策決策中獲得他們的支持,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 26% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over IHS Holding. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

擁有24%股權的私人股本公司可以在公司策略制定方面發揮作用,着重於價值創造。一些人可能會喜歡這一點,因爲私人股本公司有時是持續問責管理的激進者。但是有時,私人股本是在公司上市後銷售股份的。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

With an ownership of 24%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

對於IHS Holding,公共公司擁有26%的股權。很難確定,但這表明它們具有相互關聯的業務利益。這可能是一種戰略性投資,因此值得關注該股的股權變化。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

It appears to us that public companies own 26% of IHS Holding. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

我認爲看一個公司到底由誰擁有是非常有趣的。但是,爲了獲得真正的洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。因此,您應該注意我們發現關於IHS Holding的 1項預警信號 。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with IHS Holding .

我發現研究公司的所有者是非常有趣的。但爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。爲此,您應該注意到我們在IHS Holding中發現的1個警告信號。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論