share_log

Individual Investors Among Dymatic Chemicals,Inc.'s (SZSE:002054) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 15% Price Drop

Individual Investors Among Dymatic Chemicals,Inc.'s (SZSE:002054) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 15% Price Drop

上週化學品公司大有化工(SZSE:002054)的散戶投資者是最大的股東之一,上週股價下跌15%後遭受重創。
Simply Wall St ·  06/06 23:40

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant control over Dymatic ChemicalsInc by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • The top 22 shareholders own 49% of the company
  • Insiders own 28% of Dymatic ChemicalsInc
  • 個人投資者對Dymatic Chemicals公司的重大控制意味着公衆擁有更多影響管理和治理相關決策的權力。
  • 前22名股東擁有該公司49%的股份。
  • 內部人持有Dymatic Chemicals公司28%的股份。

A look at the shareholders of Dymatic Chemicals,Inc. (SZSE:002054) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 51% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

觀察Dymatic Chemicals公司(SZSE:002054)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權力。擁有最大份額的是個人投資者,佔51%的所有權。也就是說,如果股票上漲(或下跌),該群體將獲得最多的利益(或損失最多)。

While insiders who own 28% came under pressure after market cap dropped to CN¥2.3b last week,individual investors took the most losses.

當市值上週下跌到2.3億元時,持有28%股份的內部人感受到了壓力,個人投資者遭受了最大損失。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Dymatic ChemicalsInc, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入研究Dymatic Chemicals公司的每一種所有者,從下面的圖表開始。

ownership-breakdown
SZSE:002054 Ownership Breakdown June 7th 2024
SZSE:002054所有權分佈2024年6月7日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Dymatic ChemicalsInc?

機構所有權對於Dymatic Chemicals公司告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

Institutions have a very small stake in Dymatic ChemicalsInc. That indicates that the company is on the radar of some funds, but it isn't particularly popular with professional investors at the moment. If the company is growing earnings, that may indicate that it is just beginning to catch the attention of these deep-pocketed investors. When multiple institutional investors want to buy shares, we often see a rising share price. The past revenue trajectory (shown below) can be an indication of future growth, but there are no guarantees.

機構在Dymatic ChemicalsInc中持有很少的股份,這表明公司受到一些基金的關注,但目前並不受專業投資者特別青睞。如果公司盈利增長,可能表明它正在引起這些有實力的投資者的注意。當多個機構投資者想要購買股票時,我們通常會看到股價上漲。過去的營業收入軌跡(如下所示)可能是未來增長的指示,但沒有任何保證。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:002054 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 7th 2024
SZSE:002054的收益和營收增長於2024年6月7日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Dymatic ChemicalsInc. Guanxiong Huang is currently the largest shareholder, with 20% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.6% and 7.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Guo Ying He, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.

對於Dymatic Chemicals公司,對沖基金沒有太多股份。目前,黃冠雄是最大的股東,持有該公司20%的流通股。與此同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有流通股的8.6%和7.2%。同時,第三大股東何國英也是董事會成員。

Our studies suggest that the top 22 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我們的研究表明,前22名股東共控制該公司不到一半的股份,這意味着該公司的股份被廣泛傳播,沒有主要股東。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

儘管我們需要研究一個公司的機構所有權數據是有道理的,但也需要研究分析師的情緒來了解市場趨勢。我們目前沒有發現任何關於該股票的分析師報道,所以該公司可能不受廣泛持有。

Insider Ownership Of Dymatic ChemicalsInc

Dymatic Chemicals公司的內部人持有大量股票。內部人在這家市值爲23億元人民幣的公司中持有6.5億元人民幣的股份。我們認爲這表明了內部人與股東的一致性,但有一點值得注意的是,該公司仍然很小;有些內部人可能創立了該企業。您可以單擊此處查看這些內部人是否一直在買賣。

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Dymatic Chemicals,Inc.. Insiders have a CN¥650m stake in this CN¥2.3b business. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

普通公衆,包括散戶投資者,擁有Dymatic Chemicals公司51%的股份。這種所有權水平使得來自更廣泛公衆的投資者有一些影響力,可以影響關鍵政策的決定,例如董事會組成、高管報酬和股息支付比率。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public -- including retail investors -- own 51% of Dymatic ChemicalsInc. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有該公司15%的股份。從這個事實本身很難得出任何結論,因此值得探究誰擁有這些私人公司的股份。有時內部人或其他相關方通過單獨的私人公司擁有公共公司的股份。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 15%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

對於一個公司擁有股份的不同群體始終值得考慮。但是,要更好地理解Dymatic Chemicals公司,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。請注意,Dymatic Chemicals公司在我們的投資分析中顯示了3個警告信號,其中有2個對我們來說不太好...

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Dymatic ChemicalsInc better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that Dymatic ChemicalsInc is showing 3 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 2 of those don't sit too well with us...

考慮到持有公司股票的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解Dymatic ChemicalsInc,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。請注意,Dymatic ChemicalsInc在我們的投資分析中顯示了3個警告信號,其中2個對我們來說並不太好……

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.

當然,您可能會在其他地方找到一項出色的投資。因此,請查看此免費的有趣公司列表。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論