Anhui Zhongyuan New Materials Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603527) Market Cap Dropped CN¥396m Last Week; Individual Investors Bore the Brunt
Anhui Zhongyuan New Materials Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603527) Market Cap Dropped CN¥396m Last Week; Individual Investors Bore the Brunt
Key Insights
主要見解
- The considerable ownership by individual investors in Anhui Zhongyuan New Materials indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- 51% of the business is held by the top 9 shareholders
- 45% of Anhui Zhongyuan New Materials is held by insiders
- 衆源新材中個人投資者擁有大量的股權,表明他們共同在管理和業務策略方面擁有更大的話語權。
- 前9大股東持有公司的51%股份。
- 衆源新材有45%的內部持有。
A look at the shareholders of Anhui Zhongyuan New Materials Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603527) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 46% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
看一下衆源新材股份有限公司(SHSE:603527)的股東,我們可以知道哪個團體最具影響力。擁有最大股份的是個人投資者,佔有46%的股權。即,如果股票上漲(或出現下行趨勢),該團體將獲得最大的收益(或承受最大的損失)。
While insiders who own 45% came under pressure after market cap dropped to CN¥2.2b last week,individual investors took the most losses.
上週市值下跌到22億元后,持有45%股份的內部人員受到了壓力,但個人投資者遭受了最大的損失。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Anhui Zhongyuan New Materials, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入探討衆源新材的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Anhui Zhongyuan New Materials?
衆源新材已經有機構在股東名冊上,他們持有公司的相當大的股份,這表明職業投資者中有一些可信度。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時會像其他人一樣犯錯誤的投資。當多個機構擁有股票時,存在着他們進行“擁擠交易”的風險。當這種交易出現錯誤時,多個方面可能會迅速拋售股票。在一家沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。你可以看到衆源新材的歷史收入和營業收入,但要記住,這裏面還有更多的故事。
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
Anhui Zhongyuan New Materials already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Anhui Zhongyuan New Materials' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
衆源新材已經有機構在股東名冊上,他們持有公司的相當大的股份,這表明職業投資者中有一些可信度。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時會像其他人一樣犯錯誤的投資。當多個機構擁有股票時,存在着他們進行“擁擠交易”的風險。當這種交易出現錯誤時,多個方面可能會迅速拋售股票。在一家沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。你可以看到衆源新材的歷史收入和營業收入,但要記住,這裏面還有更多的故事。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Anhui Zhongyuan New Materials. The company's largest shareholder is Quan Hu Feng, with ownership of 26%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 9.7% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.5% by the third-largest shareholder.
對於衆源新材,對沖基金並沒有持有太多的股份。該公司最大的股東是全虎峯,擁有26%的股權。第二大股東持有約佔流通股的9.7%的股權,第三大股東持有4.5%的股權。
We did some more digging and found that 9 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我們進行了進一步的挖掘,並發現前9大股東持有該公司股份的51%左右,這意味着除了大股東外,還有一些小股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.
儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但還是研究分析師的建議,以深入了解股票預期表現,是一個好習慣。就我們所知,該公司沒有分析師覆蓋,因此可能沒有引起注意。
Insider Ownership Of Anhui Zhongyuan New Materials
衆源新材的內部股東持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Anhui Zhongyuan New Materials Co., Ltd.. Insiders have a CN¥1b stake in this CN¥2.2b business. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的信息表明,內部人員保持着衆源新材股份的重要持股。內部人員在這個22億元的公司中持有10億元的股份。我們認爲這顯示了與股東的保持一致,但值得注意的是,該公司仍然相當小,有些內部人員可能是創辦了這個企業。你可以在這裏看看這些內部人員是否一直在買賣。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 46% stake in Anhui Zhongyuan New Materials. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
通常,個人投資者佔有衆源新材46%的股權。儘管此種所有權的大小可能不足以影響更有利於個人投資者的政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 5 warning signs with Anhui Zhongyuan New Materials (at least 2 which are a bit unpleasant) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
雖然考慮公司的不同所有群體很值得,但其他因素更爲重要。例如,不斷存在的投資風險。我們已經確認了衆源新材存在5個警示信號(至少有2個有點不好),了解它們應該成爲您投資過程的一部分。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.
如果您更喜歡覈對具有潛在優越財務狀況的其他公司,則不要錯過此免費的備有強大財務數據支持的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。