share_log

WaFd, Inc's (NASDAQ:WAFD) Recent 3.7% Pullback Adds to One-year Year Losses, Institutional Owners May Take Drastic Measures

WaFd, Inc's (NASDAQ:WAFD) Recent 3.7% Pullback Adds to One-year Year Losses, Institutional Owners May Take Drastic Measures

納斯達克上的WAFD公司最近下跌了3.7%,導致一年的虧損加劇,機構投資者可能會採取果斷措施。
Simply Wall St ·  06/08 08:45

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in WaFd implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 13 shareholders
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 機構大量持有WaFd的股份,意味着他們對公司的股價有重要的影響力。
  • 前13大股東持有公司50%的股份。
  • 最近由內部人士出售。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of WaFd, Inc (NASDAQ:WAFD), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 71% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解誰真正控制了WaFd,Inc(NASDAQ:WAFD),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。持有最大股份的是擁有71%所有權的機構。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將獲得最大的收益(如果出現下行情況,將面臨最大的損失)。

And institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's share price fell by 3.7% last week. The recent loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 3.9% for stockholders, may not sit well with this group of investors. Also referred to as "smart money", institutions have a lot of sway over how a stock's price moves. As a result, if the downtrend continues, institutions may face pressures to sell WaFd, which might have negative implications on individual investors.

機構投資者在公司股價上週下跌3.7%之後承受了最大的損失。這次最近的損失增加了股東一年的3.9%的損失,可能不符合這群投資者的心意。機構也稱爲“聰明的錢”,他們可以對股票價格的走勢有很大的影響。因此,如果下跌趨勢繼續下去,機構可能會面臨出售WaFd的壓力,這可能會對個人投資者產生負面影響。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of WaFd, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入探究WaFd的每種業主類型,首先從下面的圖表開始。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:WAFD Ownership Breakdown June 8th 2024
納斯達克:WAFD所有權結構於2024年6月8日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About WaFd?

機構持股信息告訴我們關於WaFd什麼?WaFd已經有機構投資者持有股權。他們擁有公司的尊重股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究了該股票,他們也喜歡它。但是,和其他任何人一樣,他們可能是錯誤的。如果多個機構同時改變對股票的看法,股價可能會快速下降。因此,值得關注WaFd以下的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

WaFd already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at WaFd's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

WaFd已經有機構投資者持有股權。他們擁有公司的尊重股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究了該股票,他們也喜歡它。但是,和其他任何人一樣,他們可能是錯誤的。如果多個機構同時改變對股票的看法,股價可能會快速下降。因此,值得關注WaFd以下的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:WAFD Earnings and Revenue Growth June 8th 2024
納斯達克:WAFD的收益和營業收入增長於2024年6月8日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. WaFd is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 13%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 9.7% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.9% by the third-largest shareholder.

由於機構投資者擁有發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能會注意到他們的偏好。WaFd不被對沖基金持有。公司的最大股東是BlackRock,Inc.,持股13%。爲了說明,第二大股東持有約9.7%的流通股,第三大股東持有6.9%的流通股。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 13 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

通過查看股東登記表,我們可以看到前13大股東控制了50%的所有權,這意味着沒有單個股東擁有多數股權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

儘管有道理去研究一家公司的機構所有權數據,但了解分析師的觀點也很有道理,以便知道市場的風向。由於相當多的分析師涵蓋了該股票,因此您可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of WaFd

WaFd的內部股權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in WaFd, Inc. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$30m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們最近的數據表明內部持有WaFd,Inc.的股份。它是一家相當大的公司,所以看到一些可能意義重大的對齊是非常積極的。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約3000萬美元的股票。看到內部人員投資的水平是好的。您可以在此處檢查是否最近有內部人員購買。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 28% stake in WaFd. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

普通公衆擁有WaFd 28%的持股,雖然相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,則可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand WaFd better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for WaFd that you should be aware of.

思考一家公司的不同股東群體總是值得的。但要更好地理解wafd,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們已經確定了2個你應該注意的wafd警告信號。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想發現分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份有關分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論