share_log

Retail Investors Among Candel Therapeutics, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CADL) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 20% Price Drop

Retail Investors Among Candel Therapeutics, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CADL) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 20% Price Drop

零售投資者是Candel Therapeutics,Inc.(納斯達克:CADL)的最大股東,在上週的20%股價下跌後受到重創。
Simply Wall St ·  06/08 10:46

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Candel Therapeutics' significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • 48% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • Insider ownership in Candel Therapeutics is 33%
  • Candel Therapeutics的大量散戶股東表明關鍵決策受到來自更大公衆的股東的影響。
  • 前25名股東持有48%的業務。
  • Candel Therapeutics的內部所有權比例爲33%。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Candel Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:CADL), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 51% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

爲了了解Candel Therapeutics Inc.(NASDAQ:CADL)真正的控制者究竟是誰,了解業務的所有權結構是很重要的。我們可以看到,散戶投資者擁有該公司51%的所有權,堪稱公司最大的股東。換句話說,該組織的投資將獲得最高收益(或損失)。

While insiders, who own 33% shares weren't spared from last week's US$52m market cap drop, retail investors as a group suffered the maximum losses

而內部人員擁有的33%的股份被削減了5200萬美元的市場價值,散戶投資者作爲一個整體所遭受的最大損失。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Candel Therapeutics, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入探討Candel Therapeutics的每種所有者,從下面的圖表開始。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGM:CADL Ownership Breakdown June 8th 2024
NasdaqGM:CADL股權結構拆分2024年6月8日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Candel Therapeutics?

機構持股告訴我們Candel Therapeutics有機構投資者; 他們持有公司的大部分股票。這可能表明公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好還是謹慎地依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂認可。他們也會犯錯誤。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖出售某個股票,通常會看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查Candel Therapeutics的過去收益軌跡(下文)。當然,要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that Candel Therapeutics does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Candel Therapeutics, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

NasdaqGM:CADL收益和營業收入的增長2024年6月8日。我們注意到,對Candel Therapeutics的對沖基金沒有實質性的投資。我們的數據表明,Estuardo Aguilar-Cordova(也是公司的最高主管)持有最多的股份,佔11%。當內部人員持有公司的大量股票時,投資者視其爲一個積極的跡象,因爲這表明內部人員願意將財富掛鉤於公司的未來。擁有10%和7.8%的流通股的是Laura Aguilar和Paul Manning,分別是第二和第三大股東。有趣的是,第三大股東Paul Manning也是董事會主席,再次表明公司的頭號股東擁有強大的內部所有權。此外,CEO Paul-Peter Tak擁有公司股份的0.6%。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGM:CADL Earnings and Revenue Growth June 8th 2024
Candel Therapeutics的內部所有權比例爲33%。

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Candel Therapeutics. Our data suggests that Estuardo Aguilar-Cordova, who is also the company's Top Key Executive, holds the most number of shares at 11%. When an insider holds a sizeable amount of a company's stock, investors consider it as a positive sign because it suggests that insiders are willing to have their wealth tied up in the future of the company. With 10% and 7.8% of the shares outstanding respectively, Laura Aguilar and Paul Manning are the second and third largest shareholders. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Paul Manning is also a Chairman of the Board, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders. Furthermore, CEO Paul-Peter Tak is the owner of 0.6% of the company's shares.

一些私募股權公司持有6.5%的股份”,這可能影響Candel Therapeutics董事會。有些人可能會喜歡這一點,因爲私募股權有時會成爲激進派,對管理層負責。但是,還有一些時候,私募股權公司會在公司上市後出售。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

儘管有必要研究公司的機構持股數據,但研究分析師的情緒也是有道理的,以了解風向。這隻股票有一些分析師的覆蓋,但不多。因此,有提高更多的分析涵蓋面的空間。

Insider Ownership Of Candel Therapeutics

Candel Therapeutics的內部所有權比例較高。內部人員持有價值6900萬美元的這家價值2120萬美元的公司的股份。看到內部人員如此投資公司很好。可能值得檢查一下這些內部人員最近是否一直在購買。

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Candel Therapeutics, Inc.. Insiders have a US$69m stake in this US$212m business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

大多數由個人投資者組成的公衆持有Candel Therapeutics股份的51%。這種所有權規模賦予公衆投資者一些集體權力。他們可以並且可能影響有關高管報酬,股息政策和擬議中的業務併購的決策。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 51% of Candel Therapeutics shares. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.

私募股權公司持有6.5%的股份,這可能影響Candel Therapeutics的董事會。某些人可能會喜歡這一點,因爲私募股權有時會成爲激進派,對管理層負責。但是,還有一些時候,私募股權公司會在公司上市後出售。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

With a stake of 6.5%, private equity firms could influence the Candel Therapeutics board. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

雖然了解持股公司的不同群體確實有價值,但還有其他更重要的因素需要考慮。就像風險一樣。每家公司都有,我們已經發現Candel Therapeutics有 5個警告信號(其中4個可能很嚴重!)需要了解。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 5 warning signs for Candel Therapeutics (of which 4 are potentially serious!) you should know about.

儘管考慮擁有公司的不同群體非常值得,但還有其他更重要的因素。比如風險。每個公司都有它們,我們已經發現了Candel Therapeutics的5個預警信號(其中有4個潛在嚴重問題!)你應該知道。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想發現分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份有關分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論