CEO Yin Li, Shanghai W-Ibeda High Tech.Group Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:688071) Largest Shareholder Sees Value of Holdings Go Down 18% After Recent Drop
CEO Yin Li, Shanghai W-Ibeda High Tech.Group Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:688071) Largest Shareholder Sees Value of Holdings Go Down 18% After Recent Drop
Key Insights
主要見解
- Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Shanghai W-Ibeda High Tech.GroupLtd's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
- 52% of the business is held by the top 6 shareholders
- Institutions own 19% of Shanghai W-Ibeda High Tech.GroupLtd
- 股東持股較多,這說明他們對上海緯創高新技術集團有看跌的興趣。
- 前六大股東持有該業務的52%。
- 機構佔有上海緯創高新技術集團有限公司的19%。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Shanghai W-Ibeda High Tech.Group Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:688071), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 50% to be precise, is individual insiders. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
爲了了解上海緯創高新技術集團有限公司(SHSE:688071)的真正控制者,必須了解業務的所有權結構。公司持有最多的股份的集團是個人內部人員,佔大約50%,換句話說,集團面臨最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。
And last week, insiders endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 18%.
上週內部人士遭受最大損失,隨着股價下跌了18%。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Shanghai W-Ibeda High Tech.GroupLtd.
下圖顯示了上海緯創高新技術集團有限公司的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shanghai W-Ibeda High Tech.GroupLtd?
機構投資者在上海緯創高新技術集團有限公司佔有相當數量的股份。這意味着爲那些機構工作的分析師已經看好該股。
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Shanghai W-Ibeda High Tech.GroupLtd. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Shanghai W-Ibeda High Tech.GroupLtd, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
但是,就像其他任何人一樣,他們可能是錯誤的。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖出售股票,股價下跌也是常見的。所以,值得檢查上海緯創高新技術集團的過去盈利軌跡(如下)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Shanghai W-Ibeda High Tech.GroupLtd is not owned by hedge funds. With a 21% stake, CEO Yin Li is the largest shareholder. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 9.2% and 6.5%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Ligang Qin is also a Member of the Board of Directors, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.
上海緯創高新技術集團有限公司不歸任何一家對沖基金持有,首席執行官尹立持有21%的股份。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的9.2%和6.5%。有趣的是,第三大股東秦立剛也是董事會成員,再次表明公司最高股東中有強烈的內部持股。
On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 6 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒也是有意義的,以知道風向如何。就我們所知,目前並沒有該公司的分析師覆蓋。因此,可能被忽略了。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。研究分析師的看法也可以達到同樣的效果。股票的分析師覆蓋率很低,但不多。因此,可以有更多的空間來增加其覆蓋範圍。
Insider Ownership Of Shanghai W-Ibeda High Tech.GroupLtd
上海緯創高新技術集團有限公司的內幕持股情況。
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Shanghai W-Ibeda High Tech.Group Co.,Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥1.9b, and insiders have CN¥951m worth of shares in their own names. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.
我們最新的數據表明,內部人士擁有上海緯創高新技術集團股份的相當比例。它的市值僅爲19億人民幣,內部人持有自己名下9510萬人民幣的股份。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 29% stake in Shanghai W-Ibeda High Tech.GroupLtd. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
一般公衆持有上海緯創高新技術集團有限公司的29%股份。雖然這種所有權的大小可能不足以左右政策決策的贊成,但仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Shanghai W-Ibeda High Tech.GroupLtd better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Shanghai W-Ibeda High Tech.GroupLtd (1 is a bit concerning) that you should be aware of.
對於擁有股份的不同群體值得考慮。但是,要更好地了解上海緯創高新技術集團有限公司,我們需要考慮多種其他因素。例如,我們確定了上海緯創高新技術集團有限公司的兩個警示信號(其中一個有點令人擔憂),您應該注意。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。