Recent 17% Pullback Would Hurt G.Tech Technology Ltd. (SZSE:301503) Insiders
Recent 17% Pullback Would Hurt G.Tech Technology Ltd. (SZSE:301503) Insiders
Key Insights
主要見解
- Insiders appear to have a vested interest in G.Tech Technology's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
- 59% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
- Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 內部人士似乎對G.Tech Technology的增長有着濃厚的興趣,如其巨大的所有權所示。
- 前兩大股東持有業務的59%。
- 所有權研究結合過去的表現數據可以幫助更好地理解股票的機會。
Every investor in G.Tech Technology Ltd. (SZSE:301503) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 59% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
G.Tech Technology Ltd.(SZSE:301503)的每位投資者都應該了解最強勢的股東群體。我們可以看到,個人內部人士擁有該公司的巨大股權,佔有59%的所有權,也就是說,如果股票漲了,這個群體將獲益最多(或者如果出現了經濟衰退就會失去最多)。
And last week, insiders endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 17%.
上週,隨着股票下跌17%,內部持有人遭受了最大的損失。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of G.Tech Technology, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入探討G.Tech Technology每種類型的所有者,從下面的圖表開始。
![ownership-breakdown](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240610/0-bafdd09def43c7f63916f912389020f3-0-7d4a85e4272b5a90e01e97f261a9bb50.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About G.Tech Technology?
機構持股對G.Tech Technology意味着什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
We can see that G.Tech Technology does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of G.Tech Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到,G.Tech Technology確實擁有機構投資者,並且它們持有公司的大部分股票。這意味着那些機構的分析師已經研究過該股票,並且他們喜歡它。但與任何其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖出售某支股票,往往會看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得查看G.Tech Technology的過去盈利軌跡(如下圖)。當然,還要記住考慮其他因素。
![earnings-and-revenue-growth](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240610/0-bafdd09def43c7f63916f912389020f3-1-526d8b55715eed497a0e385ee5bb3e25.png/big)
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in G.Tech Technology. Our data shows that Weiming Xie is the largest shareholder with 30% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 29% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.6% by the third-largest shareholder.
我們注意到對於G.Tech Technology,對沖基金沒有意義的投資。我們的數據顯示,謝偉明是最大的股東,擁有30%的已發行股票。爲了提供背景,第二大股東持有大約29%的已發行股票,第三大股東擁有6.6%的所有權。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 59% stake.
股東登記簿的更詳細研究表明,兩個最大的股東擁有公司的59%股權。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.
儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但還是研究分析師的建議,以深入了解股票預期表現,是一個好習慣。就我們所知,該公司沒有分析師覆蓋,因此可能沒有引起注意。
Insider Ownership Of G.Tech Technology
G.Tech Technology的內部人士所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of G.Tech Technology Ltd.. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. So they have a CN¥1.3b stake in this CN¥2.2b business. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們最近的數據表明,內部人士擁有G.Tech Technology Ltd.的大部分股權。這意味着他們可以共同爲公司做出決策。因此,他們在這個220億人民幣的企業中擁有13億人民幣的股份。大多數人會認爲這是一個積極的標誌,顯示出與股東的強烈聯盟。您可以單擊此處查看內幕人員是否一直在買賣。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 19% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般公衆,包括散戶投資者,在該公司擁有19%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這個群體不能決定大局,但它肯定會對公司的經營產生實際影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 16%, of the G.Tech Technology stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
似乎私有企業擁有G.Tech Technology的16%股份。深入研究這一點可能值得。如果相關方,如內部人員,對其中一傢俬人公司有興趣,那麼在年度報告中應予以披露。私人公司可能也對該公司有戰略興趣。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for G.Tech Technology you should be aware of, and 1 of them is a bit concerning.
儘管考慮到擁有公司的不同群體非常值得,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如:我們已經發現G.Tech Technology的兩個警示信號需要注意,其中一個有點令人擔憂。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.
如果您更喜歡覈對具有潛在優越財務狀況的其他公司,則不要錯過此免費的備有強大財務數據支持的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。