CTS International Logistics Corporation Limited's (SHSE:603128) Last Week's 6.4% Decline Must Have Disappointed Private Companies Who Have a Significant Stake
CTS International Logistics Corporation Limited's (SHSE:603128) Last Week's 6.4% Decline Must Have Disappointed Private Companies Who Have a Significant Stake
Key Insights
主要見解
- CTS International Logistics' significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- 51% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
- Institutional ownership in CTS International Logistics is 12%
- CTS國際物流的重要私人公司所有權表明,關鍵決策受到來自大衆股東的影響。
- 前三大股東持有該業務的51%。
- CTS國際物流的機構所有權爲12%。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of CTS International Logistics Corporation Limited (SHSE:603128), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 46% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
爲了了解誰真正掌控着華貿物流股份有限公司(SHSE:603128),了解該企業的所有權結構非常重要。我們可以看到,私人公司擁有該公司的絕大部分股份,佔46%的所有權。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將獲得最大的收益(或者如果經濟下行,將承受最大的損失)。
And last week, private companies endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 6.4%.
上週,隨着股票下跌了6.4%,私人公司遭受了最大的損失。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of CTS International Logistics, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入探討CTS國際物流的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About CTS International Logistics?
機構所有權告訴我們CTS國際物流的什麼信息?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
We can see that CTS International Logistics does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of CTS International Logistics, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到,CTS國際物流確實擁有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司股票的一部分。這可能意味着公司在投資界具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好謹慎依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂認可。他們也有時會犯錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時嘗試賣出某個股票,股價大跌也是很常見的情況。因此,值得檢查CTS國際物流的過去收益軌跡(如下所示)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in CTS International Logistics. The company's largest shareholder is China Logistics Group Co., Ltd., with ownership of 46%. E Fund Management Co., Ltd. is the second largest shareholder owning 2.9% of common stock, and National Council for Social Security Fund holds about 1.9% of the company stock.
對於華貿物流,對沖基金沒有太多的股票。該公司最大的股東是中國物流集團有限公司,擁有46%的股份。鵝投資管理有限公司是持有普通股的第二大股東,擁有2.9%的股份,全國社會保障基金持有公司股票的約1.9%。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 51% stake.
股東登記簿的更詳細研究表明,前三大股東擁有51%的股權,其所有權相當重要。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師建議是了解股票預期表現的更深入的做法。相當多的分析師都對該股票進行了研究,因此您可以輕鬆地查看預測增長。
Insider Ownership Of CTS International Logistics
CTS國際物流的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of CTS International Logistics Corporation Limited in their own names. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own CN¥26m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們的數據表明,內部人員僅以自己的名義擁有華貿物流股份有限公司的不到1%。但是,我們注意到,內部人員可能通過私人公司或其他公司結構間接持有利益。它是一家大公司,因此即使少量的比例利益也可以在董事會和股東之間創造共識。在這種情況下,內部人員擁有價值2600萬人民幣的股票。看到至少擁有一些內部股權總是件好事,但最好檢查這些內部人員是否一直在賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 42% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通公衆(包括散戶投資者)擁有該公司的42%的股份,因此不能輕易被忽視。儘管這個群體不能完全掌控局面,但它確實可以對公司的經營方式產生實質上的影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 46%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我們可以看到私人公司擁有發行股份的46%。私人公司可能是相關方。有時內幕人士通過掌握私人公司的持股權來參與公衆公司,而不是以個人的身份。雖然很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但值得注意作爲進一步研究的一個領域。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for CTS International Logistics that you should be aware of before investing here.
我覺得查看一家公司的具體所有者非常有趣。但是,爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,在此處進行投資之前,我們發現了CTS國際物流的1個警告信號,您需要注意這一點。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。