share_log

Following Recent Decline, Zengame Technology Holding Limited's (HKG:2660) Top Shareholder CEO Sheng Ye Sees Holdings Value Drop by 17%

Following Recent Decline, Zengame Technology Holding Limited's (HKG:2660) Top Shareholder CEO Sheng Ye Sees Holdings Value Drop by 17%

禪遊科技控股有限公司(HKG:2660)的最大股東、首席執行官葉勝看到持股市值下降17%。
Simply Wall St ·  06/11 20:43

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Zengame Technology Holding's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • 59% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • Zengame Technology Holding的大量內部所有權表明了公司擴張的固有利益
  • 59% 的業務由前三名股東持有
  • 使用公司過去業績的數據以及所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現

If you want to know who really controls Zengame Technology Holding Limited (HKG:2660), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 68% to be precise, is individual insiders. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道誰真正控制着Zengame Technology Holding Limited(HKG: 2660),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。持有公司股份最多的集團是個人內部人士,準確地說約爲68%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

And last week, insiders endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 17%.

上週,由於該股下跌了17%,內部人士遭受了最大的損失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Zengame Technology Holding.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Zengame Technology Holding的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:2660 Ownership Breakdown June 12th 2024
SEHK: 2660 所有權明細 2024 年 6 月 12 日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Zengame Technology Holding?

關於Zengame Technology Holding,缺乏機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors often avoid companies that are too small, too illiquid or too risky for their tastes. But it's unusual to see larger companies without any institutional investors.

機構投資者通常會避開規模太小、流動性太差或風險太大的公司,不符合他們的口味。但是,看到沒有任何機構投資者的大型公司是不尋常的。

There are many reasons why a company might not have any institutions on the share registry. It may be hard for institutions to buy large amounts of shares, if liquidity (the amount of shares traded each day) is low. If the company has not needed to raise capital, institutions might lack the opportunity to build a position. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. Zengame Technology Holding's earnings and revenue track record (below) may not be compelling to institutional investors -- or they simply might not have looked at the business closely.

公司在股票登記處可能沒有任何機構的原因有很多。如果流動性(每天交易的股票數量)低,機構可能很難購買大量股票。如果公司不需要籌集資金,機構可能缺乏建立立場的機會。或者,該公司的某些方面可能使機構投資者望而卻步。Zengame Technology Holding的收益和收入記錄(見下文)可能不會吸引機構投資者,或者他們可能根本沒有仔細研究該業務。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:2660 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 12th 2024
SEHK: 2660 2024 年 6 月 12 日收益和收入增長

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Zengame Technology Holding. With a 23% stake, CEO Sheng Ye is the largest shareholder. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 20% and 16% of the stock. Interestingly, the second-largest shareholder, Min Yang is also Chief Technology Officer, again, pointing towards strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

對沖基金在Zengame Technology Holding中持有的股票不多。首席執行官盛業持有23%的股份,是最大股東。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約20%和16%的股份。有趣的是,第二大股東楊敏也是首席技術官,這再次表明公司最大股東擁有強大的內部所有權。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 59% stake.

對股東登記處的更詳細的研究表明,3位大股東通過其59%的股份擁有公司的大量所有權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。據我們所知,沒有分析師對該公司進行報道,因此它可能處於雷達之下。

Insider Ownership Of Zengame Technology Holding

Zengame 科技控股公司的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Zengame Technology Holding Limited. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. So they have a HK$2.3b stake in this HK$3.3b business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.

我們最新的數據表明,內部人士擁有Zengame科技控股有限公司的大部分股份。這意味着他們可以共同爲公司做出決定。因此,他們在這項33億港元的業務中擁有23億港元的股份。大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可能希望(免費)了解他們是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 28% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Zengame Technology Holding. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Zengame Technology Holding擁有28%的所有權,公衆對Zengame Technology Holding擁有一定程度的影響力,主要是個人投資者。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 3.3%, of the Zengame Technology Holding stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

私人公司似乎擁有Zengame Technology Holding股票的3.3%。可能值得對此進行更深入的研究。如果關聯方,例如內部人士,對其中一傢俬營公司有興趣,則應在年度報告中予以披露。私營公司也可能在公司中擁有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Zengame Technology Holding you should know about.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,考慮風險。每家公司都有它們,我們發現了一個你應該知道的Zengame Technology Holding警告標誌。

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.

當然,通過尋找其他地方,你可能會找到一筆不錯的投資。因此,來看看這份有趣的公司的免費清單吧。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論