share_log

Insiders of Newlink Technology Inc. (HKG:9600) Have Had a Great Week After Last Week's HK$557m Gain and They Haven't Stopped Buying

Insiders of Newlink Technology Inc. (HKG:9600) Have Had a Great Week After Last Week's HK$557m Gain and They Haven't Stopped Buying

新紐科技(臨時代碼)的內部人士本週非常幸運,在上週賺取了5.57億港元的收益後,他們沒有停止購買。
Simply Wall St ·  06/11 20:51

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant insider control over Newlink Technology implies vested interests in company growth
  • A total of 3 investors have a majority stake in the company with 55% ownership
  • Recent purchases by insiders
  • 新紐科技的內部控制顯然暗示了公司增長方面的利益關係。
  • 公司的大部分股權掌握在3名投資者手中,持股比例達55%
  • 最近有內部人員購買。

A look at the shareholders of Newlink Technology Inc. (HKG:9600) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 55% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看新紐科技股份有限公司(港股:9600)的股東就可以知道哪個群體最具影響力。而持有最大股份的群體是擁有55%所有權的個人內部人員。換句話說,這個群體會從他們對該公司的投資中獲得最多(或輸掉最多)利益。

A quick look at our data suggests that insiders have been buying shares in the company recently and their bets paid off last week after the stock gained 29%.

快速瀏覽我們的數據可以得出結論,內部人員最近一直在購買公司股份,並且他們的投注上週獲得了29%的收益。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Newlink Technology.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東對新紐科技的影響。

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:9600 Ownership Breakdown June 12th 2024
2024年6月12日SEHK:9600所有權分佈

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Newlink Technology?

機構投資者缺席新紐科技的持股登記簿,這給我們帶來了什麼樣的信息?

Institutional investors often avoid companies that are too small, too illiquid or too risky for their tastes. But it's unusual to see larger companies without any institutional investors.

機構不擁有股票的原因有多種解釋。最常見的是公司相對於管理基金過小,因此機構不必仔細審查公司。也有可能是基金經理人不持有股票,因爲他們不確信該股票表現良好。機構投資者可能並不認爲該業務的歷史增長令人印象深刻,或者可能有其他因素在起作用。您可以自己看到Zibuyu Group的過去營業收入表現。

There are many reasons why a company might not have any institutions on the share registry. It may be hard for institutions to buy large amounts of shares, if liquidity (the amount of shares traded each day) is low. If the company has not needed to raise capital, institutions might lack the opportunity to build a position. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. Newlink Technology's earnings and revenue track record (below) may not be compelling to institutional investors -- or they simply might not have looked at the business closely.

公司可能沒有任何機構的股權登記簿的原因有很多。如果流動性很低,機構可能難以購買大量股份。如果公司沒有需要籌集資金,機構可能缺乏建立頭寸的機會。也有可能是基金經理沒有持有該股票,因爲他們不認爲它會表現出色。新紐科技的收益和營業收入的歷史記錄(以下)對機構投資者可能缺乏吸引力 - 或者他們根本沒有仔細研究過該業務。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:9600 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 12th 2024
2024年6月12日SEHK:9600收入和營業收入增長

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Newlink Technology. The company's CEO Shuchun Zhai is the largest shareholder with 32% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 15% and 8.5%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

對於新紐科技,對沖基金沒有太多股份。其首席執行官翟叔春持有32%的流通股份,排名第二和第三的最大股東分別持有流通股份的15%和8.5%。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 3 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

經過更深入的挖掘,我們發現前3大股東共控制了公司股份的一半以上,這意味着他們有相當大的權力來影響公司的決策。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但同時調查分析師建議也是很好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。我們目前沒有發現任何關於該公司的分析師報道,因此該公司不太可能被廣泛持有。

Insider Ownership Of Newlink Technology

新紐科技的內部人員持股佔比超過一半。這給了他們很大的權力。所以他們在這個24億港元的業務中擁有14億港元的股份。大多數人會認爲這是積極的,顯示股東具有強烈的利益契合度。你可以點擊這裏查看內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然“內部人士”的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

It seems that insiders own more than half the Newlink Technology Inc. stock. This gives them a lot of power. So they have a HK$1.4b stake in this HK$2.4b business. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

雖然考慮擁有某家公司的不同群體是非常值得的,但有其他更重要的因素。例如,我們確定了新紐科技的3個警告信號(其中2個值得關注),您應該注意。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 45% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

普通公衆--包括散戶投資者--持有該公司45%的股份,因此無法輕易忽略。儘管這樣的股份相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不符,則可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Newlink Technology (2 are significant) that you should be aware of.

雖然考慮公司的不同股東團體是很值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,我們已經確認新紐科技(臨時代碼)有3個警示信號(其中2個非常重要),你應該注意到。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.

當然,這可能不是最好的購買股票。因此,查看這份免費免費的有趣公司列表可能會有所幫助。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論