share_log

Red Avenue New Materials Group Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603650) Adds CN¥1.3b in Market Cap and Insiders Have a 63% Stake in That Gain

Red Avenue New Materials Group Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603650) Adds CN¥1.3b in Market Cap and Insiders Have a 63% Stake in That Gain

彤程新材料集團有限公司(SHSE:603650)增加了13億元人民幣市值,內部人士持有該收益的63%。
Simply Wall St ·  06/11 21:38

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Red Avenue New Materials Group's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • Ning Zhang owns 63% of the company
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 彤程新材重要的內部持股暗示公司擴張的內在利益。
  • Ning Zhang持有公司的63%。
  • 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。

A look at the shareholders of Red Avenue New Materials Group Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603650) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 63% to be precise, is individual insiders. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看一下Red Avenue New Materials Group Co.,Ltd.(SHSE:603650)的股東,就可以告訴我們哪個團體最有權勢。在公司中持有股份最多的團體,確切地說是約63%的個人內部人士,換句話說,該團體最可能從其對公司的投資中獲益最多(或者虧損最多)。

Clearly, insiders benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by CN¥1.3b last week.

顯然,上週該公司市值上漲13億元后,內部人士從中獲益最大。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Red Avenue New Materials Group.

在下面的圖表中,我們將放大Red Avenue New Materials Group的不同所有權團體。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:603650 Ownership Breakdown June 12th 2024
SHSE:603650所有權分解 2024年6月12日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Red Avenue New Materials Group?

機構持股告訴我們什麼呢?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

Red Avenue New Materials Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Red Avenue New Materials Group's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

Red Avenue New Materials Group已經有機構持股。實際上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這表明,專業投資者中有一些信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會做出錯誤的投資,就像任何人一樣。當多個機構擁有股票時,總是存在他們面臨着“過度交易”的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多個方面可能會競相快速拋售股票。在一個沒有成長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Red Avenue New Materials Group的歷史收入和營業收入,但請記住故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:603650 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 12th 2024
SHSE:603650收益和營業收入增長 2024年6月12日

Red Avenue New Materials Group is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Ning Zhang, with ownership of 63%. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 5.2% and 3.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

Red Avenue New Materials Group不是由對沖基金持有的。該公司最大的股東是Ning Zhang,持股63%。這意味着他們掌控着公司未來的多數利益。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有5.2%和3.0%的流通股。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構持股情況是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以取得相同的結果。相當多的分析師涵蓋了這筆股票,所以你可以很容易地調查預測增長。

Insider Ownership Of Red Avenue New Materials Group

Red Avenue New Materials Group的內部持股

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

It seems that insiders own more than half the Red Avenue New Materials Group Co., Ltd. stock. This gives them a lot of power. Given it has a market cap of CN¥19b, that means insiders have a whopping CN¥12b worth of shares in their own names. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if they have been selling down their stake.

似乎內部人士持有Red Avenue New Materials Group Co.,Ltd.股票超過一半。這使他們擁有很大的權力。考慮到它的市值爲190億元人民幣,這意味着內部人士擁有高達120億元人民幣的股票。大多數人會認爲這是一個積極的因素,顯示出與股東的強大一致性。你可以點擊這裏查看他們是否已減持股份。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 21% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括零售投資者在內的公衆持有該公司21%的股份,因此不能被輕易忽視。雖然這種所有權比例可能不足以使決策有利於他們,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 8.3%, of the Red Avenue New Materials Group stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

似乎私人公司持有Red Avenue New Materials Group股票的8.3%。這可能值得深入研究。如果涉及方,例如內部人員,對其中一個私人公司有利益,那麼應在年度報告中披露。私人公司也可能對公司具有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Red Avenue New Materials Group better, we need to consider many other factors. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Red Avenue New Materials Group (of which 1 is significant!) you should know about.

總是值得考慮持有公司股份的不同團體。但是要更好地了解Red Avenue New Materials Group,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。比如風險。每個公司都有風險,我們已經注意到Red Avenue New Materials Group有2個警告信號(其中1個非常重要!),您應該知道。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論