share_log

The Recent Pullback Must Have Dismayed Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust (SGX:T82U) Insiders Who Own 39% of the Company

The Recent Pullback Must Have Dismayed Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust (SGX:T82U) Insiders Who Own 39% of the Company

最近的回撤一定讓擁有公司39%股權房地產投資信託(新加坡交易所:T82U)的內部人員感到沮喪。
Simply Wall St ·  06/12 19:28

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant insider control over Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust implies vested interests in company growth
  • The top 6 shareholders own 52% of the company
  • 22% of Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust is held by Institutions
  • 對新達房地產投資信託基金的重大內部控制意味着公司增長中的既得利益
  • 前6名股東擁有公司52%的股份
  • 新達房地產投資信託的22%由機構持有

Every investor in Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust (SGX:T82U) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 39% to be precise, is individual insiders. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

新達房地產投資信託基金(SGX: T82U)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。持有公司股份最多的集團是內部個人,準確地說約爲39%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

And last week, insiders endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 4.5%.

上週,由於該股下跌了4.5%,內部人士遭受了最大的損失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust.

在下圖中,我們放大了新達房地產投資信託基金的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
SGX:T82U Ownership Breakdown June 12th 2024
新加坡證券交易所:T82U 所有權明細 2024 年 6 月 12 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust?

關於新達房地產投資信託基金,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

We can see that Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,新達房地產投資信託基金確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看新達房地產投資信託基金過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SGX:T82U Earnings and Revenue Growth June 12th 2024
新加坡證券交易所:T82U 收益和收入增長 2024 年 6 月 12 日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust. Yigang Tang is currently the company's largest shareholder with 15% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 10% and 9.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

對沖基金在新達房地產投資信託基金中持有的股份不多。唐一剛目前是公司的最大股東,已發行股份的15%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的10%和9.0%。

We also observed that the top 6 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前六名股東佔股票登記冊的一半以上,少數規模較小的股東可以在一定程度上平衡大股東的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust

新達房地產投資信託基金的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful S$1.2b stake in this S$3.1b business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

我們最新的數據表明,內部人士擁有新達房地產投資信託基金合理比例的股份。有趣的是,內部人士在這項31億新元的業務中擁有12億新元的大量股份。大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您不妨訪問這張顯示內部人士近期交易的免費圖表。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 38% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司38%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 4 warning signs with Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust (at least 1 which makes us a bit uncomfortable) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,投資風險的幽靈無處不在。我們已經向新達房地產投資信託基金確定了4個警告信號(至少有1個讓我們有點不舒服),了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論