share_log

After the Recent Decline, Atlas Lithium Corporation (NASDAQ:ATLX) CEO Marc Fogassa's Holdings Have Lost 29% of Their Value

After the Recent Decline, Atlas Lithium Corporation (NASDAQ:ATLX) CEO Marc Fogassa's Holdings Have Lost 29% of Their Value

最近下跌後,納斯達克的Atlas鋰礦公司(NASDAQ: ATLX)的首席執行官Marc Fogassa的股份已經貶值29%。
Simply Wall St ·  06/13 06:19

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant insider control over Atlas Lithium implies vested interests in company growth
  • A total of 4 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
  • Institutional ownership in Atlas Lithium is 12%
  • Atlas Lithium存在重要內部控制,意味着對公司創業板存在既得利益。
  • 該公司總計有4位投資者持有大部分股份,佔有52%的所有權。
  • Atlas Lithium的機構持股爲12%。

If you want to know who really controls Atlas Lithium Corporation (NASDAQ:ATLX), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 41% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道誰真正掌控了Atlas Lithium Corporation (NASDAQ:ATLX),那麼你需要看一下股權登記簿的構成情況。個人內部人持有公司的大部分股份,持股比例爲41%。換句話說,該群體在投資公司方面面臨最大的收益(或虧損)風險。

And last week, insiders endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 29%.

而上週,內部人遭受了最大的損失,因爲該股下跌了29%。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Atlas Lithium.

下圖中,我們放大了Atlas Lithium的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:ATLX Ownership Breakdown June 13th 2024
納斯達克:ATLX 2024年6月13日股權結構的拆分。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Atlas Lithium?

機構所持有的股權告訴我們Atlas Lithium的什麼信息?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

Atlas Lithium already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Atlas Lithium, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

Atlas Lithium已經有機構在股權登記簿上了。他們確實擁有公司可觀的一部分股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師們已經看了這支股票,他們喜歡這個公司。但是,像其他人一樣,他們可能會錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得注意Atlas Lithium過去的收益軌跡(如下圖)。當然,也要記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:ATLX Earnings and Revenue Growth June 13th 2024
納斯達克:ATLX 2024年6月13日盈利和營業收入的增長。

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Atlas Lithium. With a 30% stake, CEO Marc Fogassa is the largest shareholder. Mitsui & Co., Ltd. is the second largest shareholder owning 13% of common stock, and Antonis Palikrousis holds about 5.2% of the company stock.

對於Atlas Lithium,對沖基金持有的股份不多。擁有30%的股份,CEO Marc Fogassa是最大的股東。三井物產株式會社是持有13%普通股的第二大股東,Antonis Palikrousis持有公司股份約5.2%。

On looking further, we found that 52% of the shares are owned by the top 4 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.

進一步觀察發現,前四名股東持有52%的股份。換句話說,這些股東對該公司的決策有重要的發言權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。

Insider Ownership Of Atlas Lithium

Atlas Lithium的內部人持股情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Atlas Lithium Corporation. Insiders own US$75m worth of shares in the US$180m company. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

看起來內部人擁有Atlas Lithium Corporation的相當大的份額。內部人擁有價值7500萬美元的Atlas Lithium的股份。看到內部人如此投資於企業是很好的。有必要檢查這些內部人近期是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 34% stake in Atlas Lithium. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

通常情況下,普通公衆持有Atlas Lithium 34%的股份。雖然擁有相當的所有權,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,可能無法改變公司政策。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

Public companies currently own 13% of Atlas Lithium stock. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.

上市公司目前持有Atlas Lithium股份的13%。不能肯定,但這可能是一個戰略性的股份。這些企業可能相似或合作。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Atlas Lithium better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 5 warning signs for Atlas Lithium (1 is potentially serious) that you should be aware of.

想要更好地理解Atlas Lithium,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們已經發現了5個預警信號(其中1個可能很嚴重),這些警示您應該注意。無論如何,始終值得考慮公司中擁有股份的不同群體。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論