A Great Week That Adds to Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:SYBT) One-year Returns, Institutional Investors Who Own 56% Must Be Happy
A Great Week That Adds to Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:SYBT) One-year Returns, Institutional Investors Who Own 56% Must Be Happy
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Stock Yards Bancorp's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- The top 20 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Insiders have sold recently
- 高機構持股意味着Stock Yards Bancorp的股價對機構交易行爲敏感。
- 前20大股東持有公司51%的股份。
- 近期內有內部人士出售股票
If you want to know who really controls Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ:SYBT), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 56% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果你想知道誰真正控制着Stock Yards Bancorp,Inc.(納斯達克:SYBT),那麼你需要看一下股東名冊的構成。擁有56%的股份,機構擁有最多的公司股份。換句話說,該集團從其對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最多)。
And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$63m in market cap last week. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 3.6%.
上週公司市值增加了6300萬美元,機構投資者的前景正在好轉。上週的收益將進一步提高股東的一年回報率,目前爲3.6%。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Stock Yards Bancorp.
下圖是Stock Yards Bancorp的不同所有權群體。
![ownership-breakdown](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240613/0-daac8056bbbbae63799eb9b5e36847c3-0-6b23a62549a172866321d8dfcadcd287.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Stock Yards Bancorp?
機構持股告訴我們哪些關於Stock Yards Bancorp的信息?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
We can see that Stock Yards Bancorp does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Stock Yards Bancorp's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到,股份碼頭銀行公司確實擁有一些機構投資者;而且他們持有公司的相當一部分股票。這表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好還是不要過於依靠機構投資者所謂的驗證,他們也有錯誤的時候。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,總會存在“擁擠的交易”風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多方可能會競相快速賣出股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到股份碼頭銀行公司的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,這並不是全面的故事。
![earnings-and-revenue-growth](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240613/0-daac8056bbbbae63799eb9b5e36847c3-1-c65094df30b711ea07ce6384bb3797ed.png/big)
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Stock Yards Bancorp. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 6.7% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 6.0% of common stock, and Darrell Wells holds about 5.0% of the company stock.
機構投資者擁有超過50%的公司股份,因此他們可能共同強烈影響董事會決策。我們注意到對沖基金在Stock Yards Bancorp方面沒有重要投資。我們的數據顯示,BlackRock,Inc.是最大的股東,擁有6.7%的流通股,第二大股東是The Vanguard Group,Inc.,擁有普通股的6.0%,Darrell Wells持有約5.0%的公司股票。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 20 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
經過更多的挖掘,我們發現前20名持有51%的聯合所有權,這表明沒有單個股東對公司具有重要控制權。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。
Insider Ownership Of Stock Yards Bancorp
Stock Yards Bancorp的內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
We can report that insiders do own shares in Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$112m. Most would see this as a real positive. If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們可以報告內部人員確實擁有Stock Yards Bancorp,Inc.的股份。內部人員擁有價值1.12億美元的有意義的股份。大多數人會認爲這是真正的正面。如果您想探索內部對齊的問題,可以單擊此處查看內部人員是否一直在購買或出售股票。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 36% stake in Stock Yards Bancorp. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通大衆(通常是個人投資者)在Stock Yards Bancorp中持有36%的股份。雖然這個群體不能必然做出決策,但它肯定可以對公司的經營產生真正的影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Stock Yards Bancorp better, we need to consider many other factors.
始終考慮擁有公司股份的不同人群是值得的。但是要更好地了解Stock Yards Bancorp,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我喜歡更深入地了解公司過去的表現。您可以在以下詳細圖表中找到歷史收益和收入。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。