share_log

Is Victoria's Secret & Co.'s (NYSE:VSCO) 24% ROE Better Than Average?

Is Victoria's Secret & Co.'s (NYSE:VSCO) 24% ROE Better Than Average?

維多利亞的祕密&Co.(紐交所:VSCO)的24%roe是否高於平均水平?
Simply Wall St ·  06/13 11:53

Many investors are still learning about the various metrics that can be useful when analysing a stock. This article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE). We'll use ROE to examine Victoria's Secret & Co. (NYSE:VSCO), by way of a worked example.

當分析一支股票時,許多投資者仍在學習可以有用的各種度量衡。本文是爲那些想了解股本收益率(ROE)的人而寫的。我們將使用ROE來通過實例檢查維多利亞的祕密 & 公司(NYSE:VSCO)。

ROE or return on equity is a useful tool to assess how effectively a company can generate returns on the investment it received from its shareholders. In other words, it is a profitability ratio which measures the rate of return on the capital provided by the company's shareholders.

roe,即淨資產收益率,是一種評估公司如何有效地從股東手中獲取投資回報的有用工具。換句話說,它是一種盈利能力比率,衡量公司股東提供的資本的回報率。

How To Calculate Return On Equity?

如何計算股東權益報酬率?

The formula for ROE is:

roe的公式是:

Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity

淨資產收益率 = 淨利潤(從持續經營中獲得)÷ 股東權益

So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Victoria's Secret is:

那麼,根據上述公式,維多利亞的祕密的ROE爲:

24% = US$109m ÷ US$445m (Based on the trailing twelve months to May 2024).

24%= US $ 109m ÷ US $ 445m(基於截至2024年5月的過去十二個月)。

The 'return' is the amount earned after tax over the last twelve months. So, this means that for every $1 of its shareholder's investments, the company generates a profit of $0.24.

“收益”是稅後在過去12個月內賺取的金額。這意味着,對於股東的每美元投資,該公司可以賺取24美分的利潤。

Does Victoria's Secret Have A Good ROE?

維多利亞的祕密有一個好的ROE嗎?

One simple way to determine if a company has a good return on equity is to compare it to the average for its industry. The limitation of this approach is that some companies are quite different from others, even within the same industry classification. As you can see in the graphic below, Victoria's Secret has a higher ROE than the average (19%) in the Specialty Retail industry.

判斷公司是否具有良好的股本收益率的一種簡單方法是將其與所在行業的平均水平進行比較。這種方法的侷限性在於,有些公司在同一行業內的分類中與其他公司非常不同。如下圖所示,維多利亞的祕密的ROE高於專業零售行業的平均水平(19%)。

roe
NYSE:VSCO Return on Equity June 13th 2024
NYSE:VSCO股本收益率2024年6月13日

That's what we like to see. With that said, a high ROE doesn't always indicate high profitability. Aside from changes in net income, a high ROE can also be the outcome of high debt relative to equity, which indicates risk. To know the 2 risks we have identified for Victoria's Secret visit our risks dashboard for free.

這正是我們想要看到的。但是,高ROE並不總是表明高盈利能力。除了淨利潤的變化之外,高ROE也可能是相對股本的高負債產生的結果,這表明承擔風險。要了解我們已爲維多利亞的祕密確定的兩個風險,請免費訪問我們的風險儀表板。

The Importance Of Debt To Return On Equity

債務對股本回報率的重要性

Companies usually need to invest money to grow their profits. The cash for investment can come from prior year profits (retained earnings), issuing new shares, or borrowing. In the first two cases, the ROE will capture this use of capital to grow. In the latter case, the debt required for growth will boost returns, but will not impact the shareholders' equity. In this manner the use of debt will boost ROE, even though the core economics of the business stay the same.

公司通常需要投資資本以增加利潤。投資的現金可以來自先前的盈利(留存收益),發行新股或借款。在前兩種情況下,ROE將捕捉這種用於增長的資本使用。在後一種情況下,用於增長所需的債務將提高回報,但不會影響股東權益。因此,債務的使用會提高ROE,即使業務的核心經濟學保持不變。

Combining Victoria's Secret's Debt And Its 24% Return On Equity

結合維多利亞的祕密的負債和其24%的股本收益率

Victoria's Secret does use a high amount of debt to increase returns. It has a debt to equity ratio of 2.52. While no doubt that its ROE is impressive, we would have been even more impressed had the company achieved this with lower debt. Investors should think carefully about how a company might perform if it was unable to borrow so easily, because credit markets do change over time.

維多利亞的祕密確實利用了大量的債務來增加回報。它的負債權益比爲2.52。雖然毫無疑問它的ROE令人印象深刻,但如果公司無法輕易借貸,則我們會更加印象深刻,因爲信貸市場隨着時間而變化。

Summary

總的來說,我們對偉明環保的表現非常滿意。具體而言,我們喜歡公司以高回報率再投資了其利潤的很大一部分。當然,這導致公司的收益大幅增長。但是,最新的行業分析師預測表明,該公司的收益預計將加速增長。

Return on equity is one way we can compare its business quality of different companies. In our books, the highest quality companies have high return on equity, despite low debt. If two companies have around the same level of debt to equity, and one has a higher ROE, I'd generally prefer the one with higher ROE.

股本收益率是我們可以比較不同公司業務質量的一種方式。在我們書中,具有高股本收益率的最高質量公司,儘管負債率低。如果兩家公司的負債與股權水平大致相同,並且其中一家公司的ROE更高,我通常會更喜歡ROE更高的公司。

But ROE is just one piece of a bigger puzzle, since high quality businesses often trade on high multiples of earnings. It is important to consider other factors, such as future profit growth -- and how much investment is required going forward. So I think it may be worth checking this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

但是,ROE只是更大難題的一部分,因爲高質量的企業通常以高倍數的收益進行交易。因此,重要的是要考慮其他因素,例如未來的利潤增長以及未來需要多少投資。因此,我認爲值得檢查有關該公司分析師預測的免費報告。

Of course Victoria's Secret may not be the best stock to buy. So you may wish to see this free collection of other companies that have high ROE and low debt.

當然,維多利亞的祕密可能不是最好的股票購買對象。因此,您可能希望查看具有高ROE和低負債的其他公司的免費集合。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論