Institutions Along With Private Equity Firms Who Hold Considerable Shares InCorsair Gaming, Inc. (NASDAQ:CRSR) Come Under Pressure; Lose 4.3% of Holdings Value
Institutions Along With Private Equity Firms Who Hold Considerable Shares InCorsair Gaming, Inc. (NASDAQ:CRSR) Come Under Pressure; Lose 4.3% of Holdings Value
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over Corsair Gaming by private equity firms implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- Wasserstein & Co., L.P. owns 54% of the company
- Institutions own 27% of Corsair Gaming
- 私募股權公司對Corsair Gaming的重要掌控權意味着普通公衆在管理和治理決策上擁有更大的影響力。
- Wasserstein & Co.,L.P擁有公司54%的股份。
- 機構擁有Corsair Gaming 27%的股份。
Every investor in Corsair Gaming, Inc. (NASDAQ:CRSR) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 54% to be precise, is private equity firms. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
Corsair Gaming,Inc. (納斯達克:CRSR) 的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。 持有公司最多股份的群體,確切地說是54%左右,是私募股權公司。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將獲益最多(或者如果發生下行趨勢,將蒙受最大損失)。
Following a 4.3% decrease in the stock price last week, private equity firms suffered the most losses, but institutions who own 27% stock also took a hit.
上週股價下跌了4.3%,私募股權公司遭受的損失最大,但機構擁有的27%的股票也受到了打擊。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Corsair Gaming, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入探討Corsair Gaming的每一種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Corsair Gaming?
機構所有權告訴我們關於Corsair Gaming什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
Corsair Gaming already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Corsair Gaming's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
Corsair Gaming已經在股份登記簿上擁有機構。他們確實擁有公司的可觀股份。這可能表明,公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。但是,最好要謹慎依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也會犯錯誤。如果多個機構同時改變了對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得看一下下面的Corsair Gaming盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Corsair Gaming. Our data shows that Wasserstein & Co., L.P. is the largest shareholder with 54% of shares outstanding. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.3% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.3% by the third-largest shareholder. In addition, we found that Andrew Paul, the CEO has 2.6% of the shares allocated to their name.
對Corsair Gaming持股不多的對沖基金。我們的數據顯示,Wasserstein& Co.,L.P.是持有54%流通股的最大股東。這意味着他們擁有對公司未來的控制權。爲了解釋一下,第二大股東持有約6.3%的流通股,第三大股東擁有5.3%的股份。此外,我們發現,首席執行官Andrew Paul將2.6%的股份分配給他們的名字。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of Corsair Gaming
Corsair Gaming的內部持股情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,在管轄範圍之間會有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理擔任執行董事會成員並非不尋常,特別是如果他們是創始人或CEO。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Corsair Gaming, Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$37m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
股東可能會感興趣地了解公司內部持股情況。這是一家大公司,所以看到這種程度的一致性非常好。內部人員擁有價值3700萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。如果您想探討內部人員的一致性問題,您可以單擊此處查看內部人員是否一直在買賣。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 16% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Corsair Gaming. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
普通公衆擁有16%的Corsair Gaming股份,大部分由個人投資者組成,這意味着他們在Corsair Gaming上具有一定的影響力。 股權規模雖然相當大,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,可能不能足以改變公司政策。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
With a stake of 54%, private equity firms could influence the Corsair Gaming board. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.
擁有54%股份的私募股權公司可能會影響Corsair Gaming董事會。有些人可能會喜歡這一點,因爲私募公司有時會成爲追責管理人的行動派。但是,其他時候,私募股權公司正在出售,讓公司上市。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.
雖然考慮所有擁有一家公司的群體很重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.
我喜歡深入了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以免費訪問該互動圖表,了解其過去的盈利、營業收入和現金流。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。