share_log

Globe Life Inc. (NYSE:GL) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 87%

Globe Life Inc. (NYSE:GL) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 87%

環球人壽保險公司(紐交所:GL)是機構投資者的最愛,他們持有其87%的股份。
Simply Wall St ·  06/14 12:50

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Globe Life's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 16 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Recent purchases by insiders
  • 高得多的機構所有權意味着Globe Life的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 共有16名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲50%
  • 內部人士最近的購買

Every investor in Globe Life Inc. (NYSE:GL) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 87% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

環球人壽公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:GL)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。機構擁有87%的股份,是公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由於機構所有者擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的分量,尤其是對於個人投資者而言。因此,向公司投資的大量機構資金通常被視爲積極屬性。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Globe Life.

在下圖中,我們放大了Globe Life的不同所有權類別。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:GL Ownership Breakdown June 14th 2024
紐約證券交易所:GL 所有權明細 2024 年 6 月 14 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Globe Life?

關於環球人壽的機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

We can see that Globe Life does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Globe Life's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到,環球人壽確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到環球人壽的歷史收入和收入,但請記住,故事中總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:GL Earnings and Revenue Growth June 14th 2024
紐約證券交易所:GL 收益和收入增長 2024 年 6 月 14 日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Globe Life is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 12% of shares outstanding. With 7.7% and 4.9% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and Wellington Management Group LLP are the second and third largest shareholders.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。環球人壽不歸對沖基金所有。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是最大股東,已發行股份的12%。貝萊德公司和惠靈頓管理集團有限責任公司分別擁有7.7%和4.9%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 16 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

仔細觀察我們的所有權數據就會發現,前16名股東的合併所有權爲50%,這意味着沒有一個單一股東擁有多數股東。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Globe Life

環球人壽的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Globe Life Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$172m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

股東們可能會有興趣得知內部人士擁有環球人壽公司的股份。這是一家相當大的公司,因此看到一些可能有意義的調整通常是積極的。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約1.72億美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。如果您想探討內幕調整問題,可以點擊此處查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 11% stake in Globe Life. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有環球人壽11%的股份。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Globe Life better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Globe Life you should be aware of, and 1 of them can't be ignored.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解環球生活,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。一個很好的例子:我們已經發現了兩個你應該注意的環球人壽警告信號,其中一個不容忽視。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論