share_log

Tyson Foods (NYSE:TSN) Could Be Struggling To Allocate Capital

Tyson Foods (NYSE:TSN) Could Be Struggling To Allocate Capital

泰森食品(紐交所:TSN)可能難以分配資本。
Simply Wall St ·  06/16 08:28

When researching a stock for investment, what can tell us that the company is in decline? Typically, we'll see the trend of both return on capital employed (ROCE) declining and this usually coincides with a decreasing amount of capital employed. Trends like this ultimately mean the business is reducing its investments and also earning less on what it has invested. And from a first read, things don't look too good at Tyson Foods (NYSE:TSN), so let's see why.

在研究一隻股票進行投資時,有什麼能告訴我們該公司正在衰退?通常,我們會看到兩者的趨勢 返回 在資本使用率(ROCE)下降時,這通常與下降同時發生 金額 所用資本的比例。這樣的趨勢最終意味着該企業正在減少投資,同時也減少了其投資的收益。從第一次讀起,泰森食品(紐約證券交易所代碼:TSN)的情況看起來並不太好,所以讓我們看看原因。

Understanding Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)

了解資本使用回報率 (ROCE)

For those who don't know, ROCE is a measure of a company's yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. To calculate this metric for Tyson Foods, this is the formula:

對於那些不知道的人來說,ROCE是衡量公司年度稅前利潤(其回報率)的指標,相對於該業務使用的資本。要計算泰森食品的這個指標,公式如下:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

已動用資本回報率 = 息稅前收益 (EBIT) ¥(總資產-流動負債)

0.027 = US$847m ÷ (US$37b - US$5.6b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to March 2024).

0.027 = 8.47億美元 ÷(370億美元-56億美元) (基於截至2024年3月的過去十二個月)

So, Tyson Foods has an ROCE of 2.7%. Ultimately, that's a low return and it under-performs the Food industry average of 11%.

因此,泰森食品的投資回報率爲2.7%。歸根結底,這是一個低迴報,其表現低於食品行業11%的平均水平。

roce
NYSE:TSN Return on Capital Employed June 16th 2024
紐約證券交易所:TSN 2024年6月16日動用資本回報率

Above you can see how the current ROCE for Tyson Foods compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you'd like, you can check out the forecasts from the analysts covering Tyson Foods for free.

上面你可以看到泰森食品當前的投資回報率與其先前的資本回報率相比如何,但從過去可以看出來的只有那麼多。如果你願意,你可以免費查看報道泰森食品的分析師的預測。

How Are Returns Trending?

退貨趨勢如何?

There is reason to be cautious about Tyson Foods, given the returns are trending downwards. To be more specific, the ROCE was 11% five years ago, but since then it has dropped noticeably. On top of that, it's worth noting that the amount of capital employed within the business has remained relatively steady. This combination can be indicative of a mature business that still has areas to deploy capital, but the returns received aren't as high due potentially to new competition or smaller margins. So because these trends aren't typically conducive to creating a multi-bagger, we wouldn't hold our breath on Tyson Foods becoming one if things continue as they have.

鑑於回報率呈下降趨勢,有理由對泰森食品持謹慎態度。更具體地說,五年前的投資回報率爲11%,但此後已明顯下降。最重要的是,值得注意的是,企業內部使用的資本量一直保持相對穩定。這種組合可能表明一家成熟的企業仍有資金部署的領域,但由於新的競爭或利潤率降低,獲得的回報並不那麼高。因此,由於這些趨勢通常不利於創造多袋機,因此,如果情況繼續保持現狀,我們就不會屏住呼吸等待泰森食品成爲多袋機。

The Bottom Line

底線

In summary, it's unfortunate that Tyson Foods is generating lower returns from the same amount of capital. It should come as no surprise then that the stock has fallen 22% over the last five years, so it looks like investors are recognizing these changes. Unless there is a shift to a more positive trajectory in these metrics, we would look elsewhere.

總而言之,不幸的是,泰森食品從相同數量的資本中獲得的回報較低。因此,該股在過去五年中下跌了22%也就不足爲奇了,因此投資者似乎已經意識到了這些變化。除非這些指標轉向更積極的軌跡,否則我們將把目光投向其他地方。

One more thing, we've spotted 2 warning signs facing Tyson Foods that you might find interesting.

還有一件事,我們發現了泰森食品面臨的兩個警告標誌,你可能會覺得有趣。

While Tyson Foods may not currently earn the highest returns, we've compiled a list of companies that currently earn more than 25% return on equity. Check out this free list here.

儘管泰森食品目前可能無法獲得最高的回報,但我們編制了一份目前股本回報率超過25%的公司名單。在這裏查看這個免費清單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論