share_log

Vanjee Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300552) CEO Jun Zhai Is the Most Upbeat Insider, and Their Holdings Increased by 4.9% Last Week

Vanjee Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300552) CEO Jun Zhai Is the Most Upbeat Insider, and Their Holdings Increased by 4.9% Last Week

萬集科技股份有限公司(SZSE:300552)的CEO翟軍是最樂觀的內部人士,他們上週的持股增加了4.9%
Simply Wall St ·  06/16 20:02

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant insider control over Vanjee Technology implies vested interests in company growth
  • The top 4 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 萬集科技重要內部控制意味着對公司增長有着特殊利益
  • 前4個股東擁有公司的51%股權。
  • 通過公司過去的業績數據和股權研究,人們可以更好地評估一家公司的未來表現。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Vanjee Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300552), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 51% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

爲了了解萬集科技股份有限公司 (SZSE:300552) 的實際控制人是誰,理解企業所有權結構是非常重要的。我們可以看到,個人內部人持有公司的大部分股權,擁有51%的所有權。也就是說,如果股票上漲(或者出現下滑),這一團隊將獲得最多的好處(或者遭受最嚴重的損失)。

As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit CN¥8.3b market cap following a 4.9% gain in the stock.

因此,股票價格上漲4.9%後,內部人上週得分最高。公司達到了83億人民幣的市值。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Vanjee Technology.

讓我們更仔細地看看不同類型的股東對萬集科技有何影響。

ownership-breakdown
SZSE:300552 Ownership Breakdown June 17th 2024
SZSE:300552股權結構拆分於2024年6月17日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Vanjee Technology?

機構對萬集科技的佔股比例非常小。這表明公司受到一些基金的關注,但目前並不是專業投資者特別青睞的對象。如果公司收益增長,可能表明這種情況剛開始引起深袋投資者們的注意。如果有多個機構投資者同時試圖購買一隻股票,股票價格上漲也並不罕見。因此,請考慮下面的歷史收益軌跡,但請記住,最重要的是未來。

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

Institutions have a very small stake in Vanjee Technology. That indicates that the company is on the radar of some funds, but it isn't particularly popular with professional investors at the moment. If the company is growing earnings, that may indicate that it is just beginning to catch the attention of these deep-pocketed investors. It is not uncommon to see a big share price rise if multiple institutional investors are trying to buy into a stock at the same time. So check out the historic earnings trajectory, below, but keep in mind it's the future that counts most.

SZSE:300552的營收與收入增長於2024年6月17日。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:300552 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 17th 2024
對於萬集科技股份有限公司,對沖基金沒有很多的股份。該公司的CEO翟軍是最大的股東,持有43%的流通股。薛俊翠是第二大股東,擁有5.0%的普通股,而林彥田持有約1.8%的公司股份。有趣的是,第三大股東林彥田也是公司董事會成員,再次表明公司的主要股東強烈持有內部人權益。

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Vanjee Technology. The company's CEO Jun Zhai is the largest shareholder with 43% of shares outstanding. Xue Jun Cui is the second largest shareholder owning 5.0% of common stock, and Lin Yan Tian holds about 1.8% of the company stock. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Lin Yan Tian is also a Member of Corporate Board, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

萬集科技股份有限公司的內部人持股比例很高。這意味着他們可以集體作出公司決策。內部人在這83億人民幣公司中擁有42億人民幣價值的股份。這是非常驚人的!可以在這裏檢查這些內部人是否已經出售他們的股份。

Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 51% of the company is controlled by the top 4 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.

我們的研究還揭示了這樣一個事實:大約51%的公司由前4個股東控制,這表明這些所有者在業務上擁有重大影響力。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

儘管有必要研究公司的機構持股數據,但研究分析師的情緒也是有道理的,以了解風向。這隻股票有一些分析師的覆蓋,但不多。因此,有提高更多的分析涵蓋面的空間。

Insider Ownership Of Vanjee Technology

通常是個人投資者的普通公衆持有萬集科技股份有限公司的47%的股份。雖然這種所有權的規模可能不足以扭轉政策決策,但他們仍然可以對企業政策產生集體影響。

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Vanjee Technology Co., Ltd.. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. Insiders own CN¥4.2b worth of shares in the CN¥8.3b company. That's extraordinary! It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been selling any of their shares.

雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同群體是非常有價值的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,投資風險的不斷出現。我們已經確定了萬集科技股份有限公司的一個警示信號,理解它們應該成爲您投資過程的一部分。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 47% stake in Vanjee Technology. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通大衆——通常是個體投資者——持有萬集科技47%的股份。雖然這種所有權規模可能不足以左右有利於他們的政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Vanjee Technology , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

雖然考慮公司所有者的不同群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,投資風險的常見威脅。我們已經識別出萬集科技的1個預警信號,並且理解它們應該成爲您投資過程的一部分。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論