share_log

Potential Upside For The Kraft Heinz Company (NASDAQ:KHC) Not Without Risk

Potential Upside For The Kraft Heinz Company (NASDAQ:KHC) Not Without Risk

卡夫亨氏公司(納斯達克:KHC)有潛在上漲空間,但不是沒有風險。
Simply Wall St ·  06/15 10:05

When close to half the companies in the United States have price-to-earnings ratios (or "P/E's") above 17x, you may consider The Kraft Heinz Company (NASDAQ:KHC) as an attractive investment with its 13.9x P/E ratio.  Although, it's not wise to just take the P/E at face value as there may be an explanation why it's limited.  

當將近一半的美國公司的市盈率(或 “市盈率”)高於17倍時,您可以將卡夫亨氏公司(納斯達克股票代碼:KHC)的市盈率爲13.9倍視爲具有吸引力的投資。但是,僅按面值計算市盈率是不明智的,因爲可以解釋爲什麼市盈率有限。

Kraft Heinz certainly has been doing a good job lately as its earnings growth has been positive while most other companies have been seeing their earnings go backwards.   It might be that many expect the strong earnings performance to degrade substantially, possibly more than the market, which has repressed the P/E.  If you like the company, you'd be hoping this isn't the case so that you could potentially pick up some stock while it's out of favour.    

卡夫亨氏最近確實做得很好,因爲其收益增長是正的,而大多數其他公司的收益卻在倒退。許多人可能預計,強勁的盈利表現將大幅下降,可能超過抑制市盈率的市場。如果你喜歡該公司,你會希望情況並非如此,這樣你就有可能在股票失寵的時候買入一些股票。

NasdaqGS:KHC Price to Earnings Ratio vs Industry June 15th 2024

NASDAQGS: KHC 對比行業的市盈率 2024 年 6 月 15 日

Want the full picture on analyst estimates for the company? Then our free report on Kraft Heinz will help you uncover what's on the horizon.  

想全面了解分析師對公司的估計嗎?然後,我們關於卡夫亨氏的免費報告將幫助您發現即將發生的事情。

Does Growth Match The Low P/E?  

增長與低市盈率相匹配嗎?

There's an inherent assumption that a company should underperform the market for P/E ratios like Kraft Heinz's to be considered reasonable.  

人們固有的假設是,如果像卡夫亨氏這樣的市盈率才算合理,公司的表現應該低於市場。

Retrospectively, the last year delivered an exceptional 17% gain to the company's bottom line.   The strong recent performance means it was also able to grow EPS by 425% in total over the last three years.  So we can start by confirming that the company has done a great job of growing earnings over that time.  

回顧過去,去年的公司利潤實現了17%的驚人增長。最近的強勁表現意味着它在過去三年中還能夠將每股收益總額增長425%。因此,我們可以首先確認該公司在這段時間內在增加收益方面做得很好。

Turning to the outlook, the next three years should generate growth of 14%  each year as estimated by the analysts watching the company.  That's shaping up to be materially higher than the 9.9% each year growth forecast for the broader market.

展望來看,根據關注該公司的分析師的估計,未來三年每年將實現14%的增長。這將大大高於整個市場每年9.9%的增長預期。

In light of this, it's peculiar that Kraft Heinz's P/E sits below the majority of other companies.  Apparently some shareholders are doubtful of the forecasts and have been accepting significantly lower selling prices.  

有鑑於此,卡夫亨氏的市盈率低於其他大多數公司是很奇怪的。顯然,一些股東對預測持懷疑態度,並一直在接受大幅降低的銷售價格。

The Bottom Line On Kraft Heinz's P/E

卡夫亨氏市盈率的底線

It's argued the price-to-earnings ratio is an inferior measure of value within certain industries, but it can be a powerful business sentiment indicator.

有人認爲,市盈率是衡量某些行業價值的次要指標,但它可能是一個有力的商業情緒指標。

Our examination of Kraft Heinz's analyst forecasts revealed that its superior earnings outlook isn't contributing to its P/E anywhere near as much as we would have predicted.  When we see a strong earnings outlook with faster-than-market growth, we assume potential risks are what might be placing significant pressure on the P/E ratio.  It appears many are indeed anticipating earnings instability, because these conditions should normally provide a boost to the share price.    

我們對卡夫亨氏分析師預測的審查顯示,其優異的盈利前景對市盈率的貢獻沒有我們預期的那麼大。當我們看到強勁的收益前景和快於市場的增長速度時,我們假設潛在風險可能會給市盈率帶來巨大壓力。看來許多人確實在預期收益不穩定,因爲這些條件通常應該會提振股價。

We don't want to rain on the parade too much, but we did also find 2 warning signs for Kraft Heinz that you need to be mindful of.  

我們不想在遊行隊伍中下太多雨,但我們也確實發現了卡夫亨氏的兩個警告信號,你需要注意。

If you're unsure about the strength of Kraft Heinz's business, why not explore our interactive list of stocks with solid business fundamentals for some other companies you may have missed.

如果您不確定卡夫亨氏業務的實力,爲什麼不瀏覽我們的互動式股票清單,其中列出了一些您可能錯過的其他公司的業務基礎穩健的股票。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論