share_log

Private Companies Invested in Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank Co., Ltd. (SHSE:601825) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's CN¥2.1b Market Cap Decline

Private Companies Invested in Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank Co., Ltd. (SHSE:601825) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's CN¥2.1b Market Cap Decline

上海農商銀行股份有限公司(SHSE:601825)的市值上週下跌21億元人民幣,私營企業遭受打擊。
Simply Wall St ·  06/16 21:05

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant control over Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • The top 8 shareholders own 54% of the company
  • 17% of Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank is held by Institutions
  • 私人公司對上海農村商業銀行的重大控制意味着普通公衆在影響管理和治理相關決策方面具有更多的權力。
  • 前8大股東擁有該公司54%的股份
  • 17%的上海農村商業銀行由機構持有。

A look at the shareholders of Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank Co., Ltd. (SHSE:601825) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 35% to be precise, is private companies. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

觀察上海農村商業銀行的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最具影響力。在公司中持有最多股份的集團是私人公司,準確地說是佔35%,另一方面該集團也面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

As a result, private companies as a group endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by CN¥2.1b.

結果,私人公司作爲一個群體,承受了上週市值下跌21億元后最大的損失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank.

在下面的圖表中,我們將重點關注上海農村商業銀行的不同所有權組。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:601825 Ownership Breakdown June 17th 2024
SHSE:601825所有權分析(2024年6月17日)

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank?

機構所有權告訴我們關於上海農村商業銀行的什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到,上海農村商業銀行確實擁有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司股票的很大一部分。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經查看了這支股票,並且他們喜歡它。但是他們與其他人一樣,也可能犯錯誤。如果多個機構同時改變股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得看一下下面的上海農村商業銀行營收歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的事情。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:601825 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 17th 2024
SHSE:601825營收和收入增長分析(2024年6月17日)

Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Shanghai International Group Co.,Ltd. is the largest shareholder with 9.3% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are Baoshan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. and China COSCO Shipping Corporation Limited, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 8.3%.

上海農村商業銀行不是由對沖基金擁有。我們的數據顯示,上海國際集團有限公司是該公司的最大股東,持有外流通股的9.3%。第二和第三大的股東是包鋼股份有限公司和中國遠洋海運集團有限公司,在公司中持有相同數量的股份(8.3%)。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 8 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

進一步調查發現,超過一半的Bentley Systems股份歸前8位股東所有,這表明大股東和小股東的利益在一定程度上得到平衡。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank

上海農村商業銀行內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank Co., Ltd. in their own names. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own CN¥30m of stock. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們的數據顯示,公司內部人員以自己的名義擁有不到1%的上海農村商業銀行股份。但是,他們可能通過我們沒有發現的公司結構間接持有利益。由於規模太大,我們不會期望內部人員擁有大量的股票。總體上,他們持有的股票價值爲3千萬人民幣。看到至少有些內部所有權總是好的,但需要檢查那些內部人員是否一直在賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 32% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

擁有32%的普通公衆(主要由個人投資者組成)對上海農村商業銀行具有一定的影響力。然而,即使決策與其他大股東不一致,這種所有權規模雖然相當大,但可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 35%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們可以看到,私人公司擁有股份的比例爲35%。這可能值得更深入地了解一下。如果相關方,例如內部人員,在其中一個私人公司中擁有利益,那麼這應該在年報中披露。私人公司也可能對公司有戰略上的利益。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

Public companies currently own 8.3% of Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank stock. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

上海農村商業銀行的公共公司目前持有8.3%的股份。雖然很難確定,但這表明他們擁有相互交織的商業利益。這可能是一個戰略性的持股,因此值得關注這個領域的所有權變化。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank you should know about.

雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體很有價值,但還有其他更重要的因素。考慮風險。每個公司都有風險,我們已經發現了上海農村商業銀行的1個警告信號,你應該知道。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論